Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13206-018-2407-9

Development of the Microfluidic Device to Regulate Shear Stress Gradients  

Kim, Tae Hyeon (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sogang University)
Lee, Jong Min (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sogang University)
Ahrberg, Christian D. (Research Center, Sogang University)
Chung, Bong Geun (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sogang University)
Publication Information
BioChip Journal / v.12, no.4, 2018 , pp. 294-303 More about this Journal
Abstract
Shear stress occurs in flowing liquids, especially at the interface of a flowing liquid and a stationary solid phase. Thus, it occurs inside the artery system of the human body, where it is responsible for a number of biological functions. The shear stress level generally remains less than $70dyne/cm^2$ in the whole circulatory system, but in the stenotic arteries, which are constricted by 95%, a shear stress greater than $1,000dyne/cm^2$ can be reached. Methods of researching the effects of shear stress on cells are of large interest to understand these processes. Here, we show the development of a microfluidic device for generating shear stress gradients. The performance of the shear stress gradient generator was theoretically simulated prior to experiments. Through simple manipulations of the liquid flow, the shape and magnitude of the shear stress gradients can be manipulated. Our microfluidic device consisted of five portions divided by arrays of micropillars. The generated shear stress gradient has five distinct levels at 8.38, 6.55, 4.42, 2.97, and $2.24dyne/cm^2$. Thereafter, an application of the microfluidic device was demonstrated testing the effect of shear stress on human umbilical vein endothelial cells.
Keywords
Microfluidic device; Shear stress; Micropillar;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zhang, X., Jones, P. & Haswell, S.J. Attachment and detachment of living cells on modified microchannel surfaces in a microfluidic-based lab-on-a-chip system. Chem. Eng. J. 135, S82-88 (2008).   DOI
2 Plouffe, B.D. et al. Peptide-mediated selective adhesion of smooth muscle and endothelial cells in microfluidic shear flow. Langmuir 23, 5050-5055 (2007).   DOI
3 Plouffe, B.D., Kniazeva, T., Mayer, J.E., Murthy, S.K. & Sales, V.L. Development of microfluidics as endothelial progenitor cell capture technology for cardiovascular tissue engineering and diagnostic medicine. FASEB J. 23, 3309-3314 (2009).   DOI
4 Sin, A., Murthy, S.K., Revzin, A., Tompkins, R.G. & Toner, M. Enrichment using antibody-coated microfluidic chambers in shear flow: model mixtures of human lymphocytes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 91, 816-826 (2005).   DOI
5 Sorescu, G.P. et al. Bone morphogenic protein 4 produced in endothelial cells by oscillatory shear stress stimulates an inflammatory response. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 31128-31135 (2003).   DOI
6 Glen, K. et al. Modulation of functional responses of endothelial cells linked to angiogenesis and inflammation by shear stress: differential effects of the mechanotransducer CD31. J. Cell Physiol. 227, 2710-2721 (2012).   DOI
7 Stolberg, S. & McCloskey, K.E. Can shear stress direct stem cell fate? Biotechnol. Progr. 25, 10-19 (2009).   DOI
8 Chen, W.-M. et al. A novel gait platform to measure isolated plantar metatarsal forces during walking. J. Biomech. 43, 2017-2021 (2010).   DOI
9 Karki, S., Lekkala, J., Kuokkanen, H. & Halttunen, J. Development of a piezoelectric polymer film sensor for plantar normal and shear stress measurements. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 154, 57-64 (2009).   DOI
10 Heywood, E.J., Jeutter, D.C. & Harris, G.F. Tri-axial plantar pressure sensor: design, calibration and characterization. The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 2010-2013 (2004).
11 Rajala, S. & Lekkala, J. Plantar shear stress measurements - A review. Clin. Biomech. 29, 475-483 (2014).   DOI
12 Gnanamanickam, E.P., Nottebrock, B., Grosse, S., Sullivan, J.P. & Schroder, W. Measurement of turbulent wall shear-stress using micro-pillars. Meas. Sci. Technol. 24, 124002 (2013).   DOI
13 Green, J.V. et al. Effect of channel geometry on cell adhesion in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 9, 677-685 (2009).   DOI
14 Lee, J.M., Kim, J.-e., Kang, E., Lee, S.-H. & Chung, B.G. An integrated microfluidic culture device to regulate endothelial cell differentiation from embryonic stem cells. Electrophoresis 32, 3133-3137 (2011).   DOI
15 Kim, T.H., Lee, J.M., Chung, B.H. & Chung. B.G. Development of microfluidic LED sensor platform. Nano Converg. 2, 12 (2015).   DOI
16 Park, J. et al. Control of stem cell fate and function by engineering physical microenvironments. Intrgr. Biol. 4, 1008-1018 (2012).   DOI
17 Bowden, N. et al. Experimental Approaches to Study Endothelial Responses to Shear Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 25, 389-400 (2016).   DOI
18 Chiu, D.T. et al. Small but Perfectly Formed? Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities for Microfluidics in the Chemical and Biological Sciences. Chem. 2, 201-223 (2017).   DOI
19 Kim, J.-y., Chang, S.-I. & O'Hare, D. Integration of monolithic porous polymer with droplet-based microfluidics on a chip for nano/picoliter volume sample analysis. Nano Converg. 1, 3 (2014).   DOI
20 Panigrahi, P.K. Transport Phenomena in Microfluidic Systems: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 13-19 (2016).
21 Yuki, T., Masayuki, Y., Teruo, O., Takehiko, K. & Kiichi, S. Evaluation of effects of shear stress on hepatocytes by a microchip-based system. Meas. Sci. Technol. 17, 3167 (2006).   DOI
22 Gutierrez, E. & Groisman, A. Quantitative Measurements of the Strength of Adhesion of Human Neutrophils to a Substratum in a Microfluidic Device. Anal. Chem. 79, 2249-2258 (2007).   DOI
23 Rupprecht, P. et al. A tapered channel microfluidic device for comprehensive cell adhesion analysis, using measurements of detachment kinetics and shear stressdependent motion. Biomicrofluidics 6, 014107 (2012).   DOI
24 Inoguchi, H., Tanaka, T., Maehara, Y. & Matsuda, T. The effect of gradually graded shear stress on the morphological integrity of a huvec-seeded compliant small-diameter vascular graft. Biomaterials 28, 486-495 (2007).   DOI
25 Galie, P., Van Oosten, A., Chen, C. & Janmey, P. Application of multiple levels of fluid shear stress to endothelial cells plated on polyacrylamide gels. Lab Chip 15, 1205-1212 (2015).   DOI
26 Back, L.H., Radbill, J.R., Cho, Y.I. & Crawford, D.W. Measurement and prediction of flow through a replica segment of a mildly atherosclerotic coronary artery of man. J. Biomech. 19, 1-17 (1986).   DOI
27 Saxena, A., Ng, E. & Raman, V. Thermographic venous blood flow characterization with external cooling stimulation. Infrared Phys. Technol. 90, 8-19 (2018).   DOI
28 Abu-Reesh, I. & Kargi, F. Biological responses of hybridoma cells to defined hydrodynamic shear stress. J. Biotechnol. 9, 167-178 (1989).   DOI
29 Bruus, H. Acoustofluidics 1: Governing equations in microfluidics. Lab Chip 11, 3742-3751 (2011).   DOI
30 Duffy, D.C., McDonald, J.C., Schueller, O.J.A. & Whitesides, G.M. Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal. Chem. 70, 4974-4984 (1998).   DOI
31 Choi, J.W. et al. Dual-nozzle microfluidic droplet generator. Nano Converg. 5, 12 (2018).   DOI
32 Choi, J.-H. et al. Priming nanoparticle-guided diagnostics and therapeutics towards human organs-on-a-chips microphyiological system. Nano Converg. 6, 24 (2016).
33 Kim, J.-Y., Chang, S.-I., deMello, A.J. & O'Hare, D. Integration of monolithic porous polymer with droplet- based microfluidics on a chip for nano/picoliter volume sample analysis. Nano Converg. 1, 3 (2014).   DOI
34 Chistiakov, D.A., Orekhov, A.N. & Bobryshev, Y.V. Effects of shear stress on endothelial cells: go with the flow. Acta Physiol. 219, 382-408 (2017).   DOI
35 Kim, H.W., Han, S., Kim, W., Lim, J. & Kim, D.S. Modulating wall shear stress gradient via equilateral triangular channel for in situ cellular adhesion assay. Biomicrofluidics 10, 054119 (2016).   DOI
36 Korin, N., Gounis, M.J., Wakhloo, A.K. & Ingber, D.E. Targeted Drug Delivery to Flow-Obstructed Blood Vessels Using Mechanically Activated Nanotherapeutics. JAMA Neurol. 72, 119-122 (2015).   DOI