Browse > Article

A TQM case of Centralized Sequential Decision-making Problem  

Chang, Cheng-Chang (Graduate School of Defense Decision Science National Defense Management College National Defense University)
Chu, Yun-Feng (Graduate School of Defense Decision Science National Defense Management College National Defense University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Quality Innovation / v.4, no.1, 2003 , pp. 131-147 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper considers that a public department under specialized TQM manpower constraints have to implement multiple total quality management (TQM) policies to promote its service performance (fundamental goal) by adopting a centralized sequential advancement strategy (CSAS). Under CSAS, the decision-makers (DMs) start off by focusing specialized TQM manpower on a single policy, then transfer the specialized TQM manpower to the next policy when the first policy reaches the predetermined implementation time limit (in terms of education and training). Suppose that each TQM policy has a different desirous education and training goal. When the desirous goals for all TQM policies are achieved, we say that the fundamental goal will be satisfied. Within the limitation of total implementation period of time for all policies, assume the desirous goals for all TQM policies cannot be achieved completely. Under this premise, the optimal implementation sequence for all TQM policies must be calculated to maximize the weighted achievement of the desirous goal. We call this optimization problem a TQM case of "centralized sequential decision-making problem (CSDMP)". The achievement of the desirous goal for each TQM policy is usually affected by the experience in prior implemented policies, which makes solving CSDMP quite difficult. As a result, this paper introduces the concepts of sequential effectiveness and path effectiveness. The structural properties are then studied to propose theoretical methods for solving CSDMP. Finally, a numerical example is proposed to demonstrate CSDMP′s usability.
Keywords
Total quality management; Resource Centralization; Experience effect; Path effectiveness; Sequential effectiveness;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Harker, P. T. and Vargas, L. G. (1990) Reply to "remarks on the analytic hierarchy process," Management Science, 36(3), pp. 269-275   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Rebai, A. (1993) BBTOPSIS: A bag based technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 60, pp. 143-162   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Rebai, A. (1994) Canonical fuzzy bags and bag fuzzy measures as a basis for MADM with mixed non cardinal data, European Journal of Operational Research, 78, pp. 34-48   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Wang, H. (1998) A comparative study of the prioritization matrix method and the analytic hierarchy process technique in quality function development, Total Quality Management, 9(6), pp. 421-430   DOI
5 Dyer, J. S. (1990) Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process, Management Science, 36(3), pp. 249-258   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Satty, T. L. (1990) An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper "Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, 36(3), pp. 259-268   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Hansson, J. (2001) Implementation of total quality management in small organizations: A case study in Sweden, Total Quality Management, 12(7&8), pp. 988-994   DOI
8 Ghodsypour, S. H. and O'Brien, C. (1998) A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming, International Journal of Production Economics, 56, pp. 199-212   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Finan, J. S. and Hurley, W. J. (1999) Transitive calibration of the AHP verbal scale, European Journal of Operational Research, 112(2), pp. 367-372   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Frei, F. X. and Harker, P. T. (1999) Measuring aggregate process performance using AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 116, pp. 436-442   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Oakland, J. S. (1995) TQM Text with Cases, Butterworth-Heinimann, Oxford
12 Satty, T. L. (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 24(6), pp. 19-43
13 McFarlane, D. G. (2001) Managing improvement in the public sector, Total Quality Management, 12(7&8), pp. 1047-1053   DOI
14 Badri, M. A. (1999) Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location allocation problem, International Journal of Production Economics, 62(3), pp. 237-248   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Xu, X. (2001) The SIR method: A superiority and inferiority ranking method for multiple criteria decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, 131, pp. 587-602   DOI   ScienceOn