Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2020.33.2.192

Comparing pain relief and functional improvement between methylprednisolone and dexamethasone lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a self-controlled study  

Donohue, Nicholas K. (Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin,)
Tarima, Sergey S. (Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin)
Durand, Matthew J. (Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin,)
Wu, Hong (Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin,)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Pain / v.33, no.2, 2020 , pp. 192-198 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have shown varying results between lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) performed with particulate versus non-particulate corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in pain relief and functional improvement between particulate and nonparticulate lumbosacral TFESIs in patients who had undergone both injections, sequentially. Methods: This was a self-controlled, retrospective study of 20 patients who underwent both a methylprednisolone and a dexamethasone TFESI to the same vertebral level and side. Primary outcomes included pain relief according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) and functional improvement determined by a yes/no answer to questions regarding mobility and the activities of daily living. Post-injection data was recorded at 2, 3, and 6 months. Results: A decrease in VAS scores of -3.4 ± 3.0 (mean ± standard deviation), -3.1 ± 3.1, and -2.8 ± 3.4 was seen for the methylprednisolone group at 2, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Similar decreases of -3.9 ± 3.5, -3.4 ± 2.8, and -2.3 ± 3.4 were seen in the dexamethasone group. There was no significant difference in pain relief at any point between the two medications. The percentage of subjects who reported improved function at 2, 3, and 6 months was 65%, 51%, and 41%, respectively, for the methylprednisolone group and 75%, 53%, and 42% for the dexamethasone group. Conclusions: These findings support the use of non-particulate corticosteroids for lumbosacral TFESIs in the context of documented safety concerns with particulate corticosteroids.
Keywords
Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Dexamethasone; Injections, Epidural; Low Back Pain; Lumbosacral Region; Methylprednisolone; Pain Management; Radiculopathy; Steroids;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Shah RV. Paraplegia following thoracic and lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: how relevant are particulate steroids? Pain Pract 2014; 14: 297-300.   DOI
2 Dreyfuss P, Baker R, Bogduk N. Comparative effectiveness of cervical transforaminal injections with particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroid preparations for cervical radicular pain. Pain Med 2006; 7: 237-42.   DOI
3 Lee JW, Park KW, Chung SK, Yeom JS, Kim KJ, Kim HJ, et al. Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the management of cervical radiculopathy: a comparative study of particulate versus non-particulate steroids. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38: 1077-82.   DOI
4 Park CH, Lee SH, Kim BI. Comparison of the effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural injection with particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroids in lumbar radiating pain. Pain Med 2010; 11: 1654-8.   DOI
5 Berkwits L, Davidoff SJ, Buttaci CJ, Furman MB. Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection, supraneural (traditional) approach. In: Atlas of image-guided spinal procedures. Edited by Furman MB, Lee TS, Berkwits L. Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders. 2012, pp 93-103.
6 Denis I, Claveau G, Filiatrault M, Fugere F, Fortin L. Randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural injections of particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroids for lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain Med 2015; 16: 1697-708.   DOI
7 Kennedy DJ, Plastaras C, Casey E, Visco CJ, Rittenberg JD, Conrad B, et al. Comparative effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections with particulate versus nonparticulate corticosteroids for lumbar radicular pain due to intervertebral disc herniation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Pain Med 2014; 15: 548-55.   DOI
8 El-Yahchouchi C, Geske JR, Carter RE, Diehn FE, Wald JT, Murthy NS, et al. The noninferiority of the nonparticulate steroid dexamethasone vs the particulate steroids betamethasone and triamcinolone in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Med 2013; 14: 1650-7.   DOI
9 Ghahreman A, Ferch R, Bogduk N. The efficacy of transforaminal injection of steroids for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. Pain Med 2010; 11: 1149-68.   DOI
10 Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, Smith HS. Systematic review of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician 2009; 12: 233-51.   DOI
11 Vad VB, Bhat AL, Lutz GE, Cammisa F. Transforaminal epidural steroid injections in lumbosacral radiculopathy: a prospective randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 11-6.   DOI
12 Kaufmann TJ, Geske JR, Murthy NS, Thielen KR, Morris JM, Wald JT, et al. Clinical effectiveness of single lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Med 2013; 14: 1126-33.   DOI
13 MacVicar J, King W, Landers MH, Bogduk N. The effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal injection of steroids: a comprehensive review with systematic analysis of the published data. Pain Med 2013; 14: 14-28.   DOI
14 Roberts ST, Willick SE, Rho ME, Rittenberg JD. Efficacy of lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a systematic review. PM R 2009; 1: 657-68.   DOI
15 Dietrich TJ, Sutter R, Froehlich JM, Pfirrmann CW. Particulate versus non-particulate steroids for lumbar transforaminal or interlaminar epidural steroid injections: an update. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44: 149-55.   DOI
16 Ludwig MA, Burns SP. Spinal cord infarction following cervical transforaminal epidural injection: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: E266-8.   DOI
17 Hodler J, Boos N, Schubert M. Must we discontinue selective cervical nerve root blocks? Report of two cases and review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 Suppl 3: S466-70.
18 Houten JK, Errico TJ. Paraplegia after lumbosacral nerve root block: report of three cases. Spine J 2002; 2: 70-5.   DOI
19 Huntoon MA, Martin DP. Paralysis after transforaminal epidural injection and previous spinal surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004; 29: 494-5.   DOI
20 Kennedy DJ, Dreyfuss P, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. Paraplegia following image-guided transforaminal lumbar spine epidural steroid injection: two case reports. Pain Med 2009; 10: 1389-94.   DOI
21 Popescu A, Lai D, Lu A, Gardner K. Stroke following epidural injections--case report and review of literature. J Neuroimaging 2013; 23: 118-21.   DOI
22 Somayaji HS, Saifuddin A, Casey AT, Briggs TW. Spinal cord infarction following therapeutic computed tomographyguided left L2 nerve root injection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: E106-8.   DOI
23 Wybier M, Gaudart S, Petrover D, Houdart E, Laredo JD. Paraplegia complicating selective steroid injections of the lumbar spine. Report of five cases and review of the literature. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 181-9.   DOI
24 Derby R, Lee SH, Date ES, Lee JH, Lee CH. Size and aggregation of corticosteroids used for epidural injections. Pain Med 2008; 9: 227-34.   DOI
25 MacMahon PJ, Shelly MJ, Scholz D, Eustace SJ, Kavanagh EC. Injectable corticosteroid preparations: an embolic risk assessment by static and dynamic microscopic analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1830-5.   DOI
26 Food and Drug Administration. $Kenalog^{(R)}$-10 injection (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension, USP) [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration; 2011. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/012041s038lbl.pdf.