Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.54

The prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study  

Lee, Sooho (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Cho, Hyung Rae (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
Yoo, Jun Sung (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
Kim, Young Uk (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Pain / v.33, no.1, 2020 , pp. 54-59 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: The median nerve cross-sectional area (MNCSA) is a useful morphological parameter for the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, there have been limited studies investigating the anatomical basis of median nerve flattening. Thus, to evaluate the connection between median nerve flattening and CTS, we carried out a measurement of the median nerve thickness (MNT). Methods: Both MNCSA and MNT measurement tools were collected from 20 patients with CTS, and from 20 control individuals who underwent carpal tunnel magnetic resonance imaging (CTMRI). We measured the MNCSA and MNT at the level of the hook of hamate on CTMRI. The MNCSA was measured on the transverse angled sections through the whole area. The MNT was measured based on the most compressed MNT. Results: The mean MNCSA was 9.01 ± 1.94 ㎟ in the control group and 6.58 ± 1.75 ㎟ in the CTS group. The mean MNT was 2.18 ± 0.39 mm in the control group and 1.43 ± 0.28 mm in the CTS group. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated that the optimal cut-off value for the MNCSA was 7.72 ㎟, with 75.0% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.95). The best cut off-threshold of the MNT was 1.76 mm, with 85% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87-1.00). Conclusions: Even though both MNCSA and MNT were significantly associated with CTS, MNT was identified as a more suitable measurement parameter.
Keywords
Anatomy; Area Under Curve; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Diagnosis; Hamate Bone; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Median Nerve; ROC Curve; Wrist;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bodofsky EB, Campellone JV, Wu KD, Greenberg WM. Age and the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 44: 195-9.
2 Deryani E, Aki S, Muslumanoglu L, Rozanes I. MR imaging and electrophysiological evaluation in carpal tunnel syndrome. Yonsei Med J 2003; 44: 27-32.   DOI
3 de Campos CC, Manzano GM, Leopoldino JF, Nobrega JA, Sanudo A, de Araujo Peres C, et al. The relationship between symptoms and electrophysiological detected compression of the median nerve at the wrist. Acta Neurol Scand 2004; 110: 398-402.   DOI
4 Wu HT, Schweitzer ME, Culp RW. Potential MR signs of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 860-4.   DOI
5 Brahme SK, Hodler J, Braun RM, Sebrechts C, Jackson W, Resnick D. Dynamic MR imaging of carpal tunnel syndrome. Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26: 482-7.   DOI
6 Keberle M, Jenett M, Kenn W, Reiners K, Peter M, Haerten R, et al. Technical advances in ultrasound and MR imaging of carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1043-50.   DOI
7 Musluoglu L, Celik M, Tabak H, Forta H. Clinical, electrophysiological and magnetic resonance imaging findings in carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 44: 161-5.
8 Bagga B, Sinha A, Khandelwal N, Modi M, Ahuja CK, Sharma R. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in diagnosing and grading carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective study. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2019. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.04.004.
9 Holovacova D, Kuzma M, Killinger Z, Payer J. Cross-sectional area of the median nerve is increased in primary autoimmune hypothyroidism and decreases upon treatment with thyroxine. Eur J Endocrinol 2016; 175: 265-71.   DOI
10 Pulikkottil BJ, Schub M, Kadow TR, Wang W, Fowler JR. Correlating median nerve cross-sectional area with nerve conduction studies. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41: 958-62.   DOI
11 Devers BN, Douglas KC, Naik RD, Lee DH, Watson JT, Weikert DR. Outcomes of hook of hamate fracture excision in high-level amateur athletes. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38: 72-6.   DOI
12 Chow JC, Weiss MA, Gu Y. Anatomic variations of the hook of hamate and the relationship to carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30: 1242-7.   DOI
13 Ikeda M, Okada M, Toyama M, Uemura T, Takamatsu K, Nakamura H. Comparison of median nerve cross-sectional area on 3-T MRI in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Orthopedics 2017; 40: e77-81.   DOI
14 Hohenberger GM, Maier MJ, Grechenig C, Schwarz AM, Matzi V, Weiglein AH. Carpal tunnel release: safe and simple identification of the flexor retinaculum based on superficial anatomical landmarks. Clin Anat 2017; 30: 512-6.   DOI
15 Ratnaparkhi R, Xiu K, Guo X, Li ZM. Changes in carpal tunnel compliance with incremental flexor retinaculum release. J Orthop Surg Res 2016; 11: 43.   DOI
16 Chammas M, Boretto J, Burmann LM, Ramos RM, Dos Santos Neto FC, Silva JB. Carpal tunnel syndrome - part I (anatomy, physiology, etiology and diagnosis). Rev Bras Ortop 2014; 49: 429-36.   DOI
17 Aroori S, Spence RA. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Ulster Med J 2008; 77: 6-17.
18 Keith MW, Masear V, Chung K, Maupin K, Andary M, Amadio PC, et al. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17: 389-96.   DOI
19 Jarvik JG, Yuen E, Kliot M. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: electrodiagnostic and MR imaging evaluation. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2004; 14: 93-102, viii.   DOI
20 Kleindienst A, Hamm B, Lanksch WR. Carpal tunnel syndrome: staging of median nerve compression by MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 1119-25.   DOI
21 El-Karabaty H, Hetzel A, Galla TJ, Horch RE, Lucking CH, Glocker FX. The effect of carpal tunnel release on median nerve flattening and nerve conduction. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 45: 223-7.
22 Atan T, Gunendi Z. Diagnostic utility of the sonographic median to ulnar nerve cross-sectional area ratio in carpal tunnel syndrome. Turk J Med Sci 2018; 48: 110-6.   DOI
23 Hersh B, D'Auria J, Scott M, Fowler JR. A Comparison of ultrasound and MRI measurements of the cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the wrist. Hand (N Y) 2019; 14: 746-50.   DOI
24 Crasto JA, Scott ME, Fowler JR. Ultrasound measurement of the cross-sectional area of the median nerve: the effect of teaching on measurement accuracy. Hand (N Y) 2019; 14: 155-62.   DOI
25 Duetzmann S, Tas S, Seifert V, Marquardt G, Dombert T, Staub F. Cross-sectional area of the median nerve before revision carpal tunnel release-a cross-sectional study. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018; 14: 20-5.   DOI
26 Ghasemi M, Masoumi S, Ansari B, Fereidan-Esfahani M, Mousavi SM. Determination of cut-off point of cross-sectional area of median nerve at the wrist for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome. Iran J Neurol 2017; 16: 164-7.
27 Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999; 282: 153-8.   DOI
28 Klauser AS, Halpern EJ, De Zordo T, Feuchtner GM, Arora R, Gruber J, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with US: value of additional cross-sectional area measurements of the median nerve in patients versus healthy volunteers. Radiology 2009; 250: 171-7.   DOI
29 Ferry S, Pritchard T, Keenan J, Croft P, Silman AJ. Estimating the prevalence of delayed median nerve conduction in the general population. Br J Rheumatol 1998; 37: 630-5.   DOI
30 Kim JK, Koh YD, Kim JO, Choi SW. Changes in clinical symptoms, functions, and the median nerve cross-sectional area at the carpal tunnel inlet after open carpal tunnel release. Clin Orthop Surg 2016; 8: 298-302.   DOI
31 McDiarmid M, Oliver M, Ruser J, Gucer P. Male and female rate differences in carpal tunnel syndrome injuries: personal attributes or job tasks? Environ Res 2000; 83: 23-32.   DOI