Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2014.27.4.334

The Effects of a Forceful Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection on Radicular Pain: A Preliminary Study  

Byun, Jong Min (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Park, Hahck Soo (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Woo, Jae Hee (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Jin (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Pain / v.27, no.4, 2014 , pp. 334-338 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) are performed to provide symptom relief in patients with radicular pain. Recent articles suggested that injected volume itself have analgesic effects and higher volumes are associated with better outcomes. To date, few studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of volume. Therefore, well-designed controlled studies were necessary to confirm the effect of volume itself on pain relief. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a forceful saline injection on lumbar TFESI using non-particulate steroids. Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with lumbar radicular pain were enrolled. The participants were allocated into one of two groups: dexamethasone with volume (Group DV) and dexamethasone alone (Group DO). The volume was delivered by a forceful injection of 5ml of normal saline. The primary end-point for this study was a VAS pain score and modified MacNab score indicating the rate of effectiveness at the four-week follow-up. Results: There were no significant post-procedural VAS differences between two groups (P = .252). The effectiveness rate among the patients was 47.8% in DV group, 34.8% in DO group, measured by modified MacNab score. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .117). Conclusions: A forceful saline injection did not have a significant effect during the treatment of radicular pain. Further studies with greater volumes and with additional techniques would offer a more conclusive perspective.
Keywords
epidural; radiculopathy; steroid;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Heavner JE, Racz GB, Raj P. Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty: prospective evaluation of 0.9% NaCl versus 10% NaCl with or without hyaluronidase. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24: 202-7.
2 Koh WU, Choi SS, Park SY, Joo EY, Kim SH, Lee JD, et al. Transforaminal hypertonic saline for the treatment of lumbar lateral canal stenosis: a double-blinded, randomized, active-control trial. Pain Physician 2013; 16: 197-211.
3 Cohen SP, Bicket MC, Jamison D, Wilkinson I, Rathmell JP. Epidural steroids: a comprehensive, evidence-based review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013; 38: 175-200.   DOI
4 Manchikanti L, Abdi S, Atluri S, Benyamin RM, Boswell MV, Buenaventura RM, et al. An update of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in chronic spinal pain. Part II: guidance and recommendations. Pain Physician 2013; 16: S49-283.
5 Chun-jing H, Hao-xiong N, jia-xiang N. The application of percutaneous lysis of epidural adhesions in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Acta Cir Bras 2012; 27: 357-62.   DOI
6 Koc Z, Ozcakir S, Sivrioglu K, Gurbet A, Kucukoglu S. Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 985-9.   DOI
7 Rabinovitch DL, Peliowski A, Furlan AD. Influence of lumbar epidural injection volume on pain relief for radicular leg pain and/or low back pain. Spine J 2009; 9: 509-17.   DOI
8 Racz GB, Day MR, Heavner JE, Scott J. Lysis of epidural adhesions: the Racztechnique. In: Pain management. 2nd ed. Edited by Waldman SD. Philadelphia (PA), Elsevier Saunders. 2011, pp 1258-72.
9 Lee JH, Moon J, Lee SH. Comparison of effectiveness according to different approaches of epidural steroid injection in lumbosacral herniated disk and spinal stenosis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2009; 22: 83-9.   DOI
10 Benzon HT, Chew TL, McCarthy RJ, Benzon HA, Walega DR. Comparison of the particle sizes of different steroids and the effect of dilution: a review of the relative neurotoxicities of the steroids. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 331-8.   DOI
11 Derby R, Lee SH, Date ES, Lee JH, Lee CH. Size and aggregation of corticosteroids used for epidural injections. Pain Med 2008; 9: 227-34.   DOI
12 Furman MB, Mehta AR, Kim RE, Simon JI, Patel R, Lee TS, et al. Injectate volumes needed to reach specific landmarks in lumbar transforaminal epidural injections. PM R 2010; 2: 625-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Park CH, Lee SH. Effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal adhesiolysis in patients with lumbar neuroforaminal spinal stenosis. Pain Physician 2013; 16: E37-43.
14 El-Yahchouchi C, Geske JR, Carter RE, Diehn FE, Wald JT, Murthy NS, et al. The noninferiority of the nonparticulate steroid dexamethasone vs the particulate steroids beta-methasone and triamcinolone in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Med 2013; 14: 1650-7.   DOI
15 Lee JH, Lee SH. Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis using Navicath for the management of chronic pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation. Pain Physician 2012; 15: 213-21.
16 Jo DH, Yang HJ. The survey of the patient received the epiduroscopic laser neural decompression. Korean J Pain 2013; 26: 27-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Manchikanti L, Cash KA, McManus CD, Pampati V, Fellows B. Fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections with or without steroids in managing pain of lumbar spinal stenosis: one-year results of randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012; 25: 226-34.   DOI
18 Luijsterburg PA, Verhagen AP, Ostelo RW, van Os TA, Peul WC, Koes BW. Effectiveness of conservative treatments for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 881-99.   DOI
19 Kim SH, Koh WU, Park SJ, Choi WJ, Suh JH, Leem JG, et al. Clinical experiences of transforaminal balloon decompression for patients with spinal stenosis. Korean J Pain 2012; 25: 55-9.   DOI   ScienceOn