Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2010.23.4.247

Use of Imaging Agent to Determine Postoperative Indwelling Epidural Catheter Position  

Uchino, Tetsuya (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine)
Hagiwara, Satoshi (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine)
Iwasaka, Hideo (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine)
Kudo, Kyosuke (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine)
Takatani, Junji (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine)
Mizutani, Akio (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine)
Miura, Masahiro (Department of Human Anatomy, Oita University Faculty of Medicine)
Noguchi, Takayuki (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Pain / v.23, no.4, 2010 , pp. 247-253 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Epidural anesthesia is widely used to provide pain relief, whether for surgical anesthesia, postoperative analgesia, treatment of chronic pain, or to facilitate painless childbirth. In many cases, however, the epidural catheter is inserted blindly and the indwelling catheter position is almost always uncertain. Methods: In this study, the loss-of-resistance technique was used and an imaging agent was injected through the indwelling epidural anesthesia catheter to confirm the position of its tip and examine the migration rate. Study subjects were patients scheduled to undergo surgery using general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia. Placement of the epidural catheter was confirmed postoperatively by injection of an imaging agent and X-ray imaging. Results: The indwelling epidural catheter was placed between upper thoracic vertebrae (n = 83; incorrect placement, n = 5), lower thoracic vertebrae (n = 123; incorrect placement, n = 5), and lower thoracic vertebra-lumbar vertebra (n = 46; incorrect placement, n = 7). In this study, a relatively high frequency of incorrectly placed epidural catheters using the loss-of-resistance technique was observed, and it was found that incorrect catheter placement resulted in inadequate analgesia during surgery. Conclusions: Although the loss-of-resistance technique is easy and convenient as a method for epidural catheter placement, it frequently results in inadequate placement of epidural catheters. Care should be taken when performing this procedure.
Keywords
epidural anesthesia; iotrolan; pain; postoperative; radiography;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Park WY, Thompson JS, Lee KK. Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 560-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Muneyuki M, Shirai K, Inamoto A. Roentgenographic analysis of the positions of catheters in the epidural space. Anesthesiology 1970; 33: 19-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Genovese A, Stellato C, Marsella CV, Adt M, Marone G. Role of mast cells, basophils and their mediators in adverse reactions to general anesthetics and radiocontrast media. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1996; 110: 13-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Yokoyama M, Hanazaki M, Fujii H, Mizobuchi S, Nakatsuka H, Takahashi T, et al. Correlation between the distribution of contrast medium and the extent of blockade during epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 1504-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Wong GT, Irwin MG. Contrast-induced nephropathy. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 474-83.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Sjogren P, Gefke K, Banning AM, Parslov M, Overgaard Olsen LB. Lumbar epidurography and epidural analgesia in cancer patients. Pain 1989; 36: 305-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Collier CB. Accidental subdural injection during attempted lumbar epidural block may present as a failed or inadequate block: radiographic evidence. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004; 29: 45-51.
8 Wills JH. Rapid onset of massive subdural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2005; 30: 299-302.   DOI
9 Liu S, Carpenter RL, Neal JM. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Their role in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 1474-506.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Grass JA. The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2000; 18: 407-28.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Burn JM, Guyer PB, Langdon L. The spread of solutions injected into the epidural space. A study using epidurograms in patients with the lumbosciatic syndrome. Br J Anaesth 1973; 45: 338-45.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Mehta M, Salmon N. Extradural block. Confirmation of the injection site by X-ray monitoring. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 1009-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Sanchez R, Acuna L, Rocha F. An analysis of the radiological visualization of the catheters placed in the epidural space. Br J Anaesth 1967; 39: 485-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Hogan Q. Epidural catheter tip position and distribution of injectate evaluated by computed tomography. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 964-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ 2000; 321: 1493.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Du Pen SL, Williams AR, Feldman RK. Epidurograms in the management of patients with long-term epidural catheters. Reg Anesth 1996; 21: 61-7.