Browse > Article

Incidence of Paresthesia Related to the Insertion Length of Catheter during the Epidural Catheterization  

Lim, Jun Goo (Shintong Pain Clinic)
Kim, Young Jae (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
Cho, Jae Heung (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
Lee, Sang Eun (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
Kim, Young Hwan (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
Lim, Se Hoon (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
Lee, Jeong Han (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
Lee, Kun Moo (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
Cheong, Soon Ho (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
Choi, Young Kyun (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
Shin, Chee Mahn (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pusan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Pain / v.20, no.1, 2007 , pp. 50-53 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Continuous epidural catheterization is a popular and effective procedure for postoperative analgesia. However, continuous epidural catheterization has associated complications such as venous puncture, dural puncture, subarachnoid cannulation, suboptimal catheter placement, and paresthesia because the tip of the epidural catheter touches thenerves of the dura in the epidural space. In this study, we compared the incidence of paresthesia in two different lengths of epidural catheter insertion. Methods: One hundred women undergoing gynecologic or orthopedic surgery were enrolled in this prospective, double-blinded, randomized study. All patients were randomly divided into two groups based on the insertion length of the epidural catheter 2 cm (group A) or 4 cm (group B). A Tuohy needle was inserted in the lumbarspinal region with a bevel directed cephalad by use of the median approach, and then the epidural space was confirmed by the loss of resistance technique with air. While the practitioner inserted an epidural catheter into the epidural space, a blind observer checked for paresthesia or withdrawal movement. Results: In 97 included patients, 30.6% of the patients in group A (n = 49) had paresthesia, versus 31.3% in group B (n = 48). Withdrawal movements were represented in 2% and 6% of the patients in group A and group B, respectively. There was no difference in the incidence of paresthesia and withdrawal movement between the two groups. Conclusions: There is no clear relationship for the incidence of catheter-related paresthesia according to the catheter length inserted into the epidural space for epidural analgesia.
Keywords
epidural catheterization; paresthesia; postoperative analgesia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Groen GJ, Baljet B, Drukker J: Nerves and nerve plexuses of the human vertebral column. Am J Anat 1990; 188: 282-96   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Bogduk N: The innervation of the lumbar spine. Spine 1983; 8: 286-93   DOI
3 Usubiaga JE, dos Reis A, Usubiaga LE: Epidural misplacement of catheters and mechanisms of unilateral blockade. Anesthesiology 1970; 32: 158-61   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Leeda M, Stienstra R, Arbous MS, Dahan A, Th Veering B, Burm AG, et al: Lumbar epidural catheter insertion: the midline vs. the paramedian approach. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 839-42   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Ballantyne JC, McKerma JM, Ryder E: Epidural analgesia-experience of 5628 patients in a large teaching hospital derived through audit. Acute Pain 2003; 4: 89-97   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Cartagena R, Gaiser RR: Advancing an epidural catheter 10 em then retracting it 5 ern is no more effective than advancing it 5 cm. J Clin Anesth 2005; 17: 528-30   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Raoul S, Faure A, Robert R, Rogez JM, Hamel O, Cuillere P, et al: Role of the sinu-vertebral nerve in low back pain and anatomical basis of therapeutic implications. Surg Radiol Anat 2003; 24: 366-71
8 D'Angelo R, Berkebile BL, Gerancher JC: Prospective examination of epidural catheter insertion. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 88-93   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Zarzur E: Pain during spinal canal puncture and its relationship with ligamentum flavum, dura-mater and posterior longitudinal ligament innervation. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2004; 54: 872-6   DOI
10 Brown DL: Spinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia. In: Miller's anesthesia. 6th ed. Edited by Miller RD: New York, Churchill Livingstone. 2005, pp 1656-7
11 Cesur M, Alici HA, Erdem AF, Silbir F, Yuksek MS: Administration of local anesthetic through the epidural needle before catheter insertion improves the quality of anesthesia and reduces catheter-related complications. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1501-5   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Kumar R, Berger RJ, Dunsker SB, Keller JT: Innervation of the spinal dura. Myth or reality? Spine 1996; 21: 18-26   DOI
13 Rolbin SH, Halpern SH, Braude BM, Kapala D, Unger R, Radhakrisnan S: Fluid through the epidural needle does not reduce complications of epidural catheter insertion. Can J Anaesth 1990; 37: 337-40   DOI
14 Beilin Y, Bernstein HH, Zucker-Pinchoff B: The optimal distance that a multi orifice epidural catheter should be threaded into the epidural space. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 301-4   DOI
15 Munoz HR, Dagnino JA, Allende M, Bugedo GJ, Montes JM, Cherres OG: Direction of catheter insertion and incidence of paresthesias and failure rate in continuous epidural anesthesia: a comparison of cephalad and caudad catheter insertion. Reg Anesth 1993; 18: 331-4