Browse > Article

Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy Using Dekompressor(R)  

Han, Sun Sook (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University of College of Medicine)
Sim, Sung Eun (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul Municipal Boramae Hospital)
Kim, Yang Hyun (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University of College of Medicine)
Lee, Eun Hyoung (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University of College of Medicine)
Joh, Ju Yeon (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University of College of Medicine)
Kim, Ji Young (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University of College of Medicine)
Lee, Sang Chul (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University of College of Medicine)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Pain / v.18, no.2, 2005 , pp. 187-191 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Discogenic leg pain is a major cause of health problems, often due to herniation of the intervertebral disc, and has traditionally been treated conservatively or with an open surgical discectomy. Conventional open surgery has many complications, such as nerve root injury, discitis and a relatively high mortality rate; failure of conservative treatments is also common. Recently, the $Dekompressor^{(R)}$ Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy probe was developed. Herein, we present the early results for a percutaneous lumbar discectomy in herniated lumbar disc disease. Methods: Eleven patients, including 8 men and 3 women, with ages ranging from 22 to 78 years, were enrolled in this study. Those patients with a previous history of back surgery were not excluded from the study. All patients were postoperatively evaluated for their clinical outcomes, such as visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain after 1 and 3 months, reduction in analgesics, functional improvement and overall satisfaction. Results: The percutaneous lumbar discectomy was completed in 11 patients (17 levels), with average reductions in pre-VAS of 61.3 and 60.2% at 1 and 3 months, respectively. Also, 72.7% of patients reported functional improvement, with 81.1% expressing overall satisfaction. There were no procedural related complications. Conclusions: We concluded that a percutaneous lumbar discectomy is a safe and effective treatment modality for a herniated lumbar disc.
Keywords
discogenic leg pain; percutaneous lumbar discectomy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Mixter WJ, Barr JS: Rupture of intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 1934; 211: 210-5.
2 Smith L: Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus in humans. JAMA 1964; 187: 137-40.
3 Onik G, Helms CA, Ginsberg L, Hoaglund FT, Morris J: Percutaneous lumbar discectomy using a new aspiration probe: porcine and cadaver model. Radiology 1985; 155: 251-2.
4 Mayer HM, Brock M: Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discecromy. J Neurosurg 1993; 78: 216-25.
5 Saal JS, Saal JA: Management of chronic discogenic low back pain with a thermal intradiscal catheter: a preliminary report. Spine 2000; 25: 382-8.
6 Chang WS, Lee SH: Clinical outcome of percutaneous endoscopic laser lumbar discectomy. Korean J Pain 2005; 18: 34-8.
7 Kato F, Mimatsu K, Kawakami N, Iwata H, Miura T: Serial changes observed by magnetic resolution imaging in the intervertebral disc after chemonucleolysis. A consideration of the mechanism of chemonucleolysis. Spine 1992; 17: 934-9.
8 Nygaard OP, Mellgren SI, Osterud B: The inflammatory properties of contained and noncontained lumbar disc herniation. Spine 1997; 22: 2484-8.
9 Stolke 0, Sollmann WP, Seifert V: Intra- and postoperative complications in lumbar disc surgery. Spine 1989; 14: 56-9.
10 Kambin P, Brager MO: Percuraneous posterolateral discectomy. Anatomy and mechanism. Clin Orrhop Relat Res 1987; 223: 145-54.
11 Mochida J, Toh E, Nomura T, Nishimura K: The risks and benefits of percutaneous nucleotomy for lumbar disc herniation. A lO-year longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 501-5.
12 Kim OW, Kim C, Yea SH, Kim SH, Kim OW: Percutaneous decompression of intervertebral disc using Dekompressor$^{\circledR}$: a case reporr. Korean J Pain 2004; 17: 326-9.
13 Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim 0: Clinical outcomes after lumbar discecromy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and annular competence. J Bone Joint Surg 2003; 85: 102-8.
14 Alo KM, Wright RE, Sutcliffe J, Brandt SA: Percutaneous lumbar discectomy: clinical response in an initial cohort of 50 consecutive patients with chronic radicular pain. Pain Praetice 2004; 4: 19-29.
15 Lee CK, Vessa P, Lee JK: Chronic disabling low back pain syndrome caused by internal disc derangements: the results of disc excision and posterior interbody fusion. Spine 1995; 20: 356-60.
16 O'Neill CW, Liu JJ, Leibenberg E, Hu SS, Oeviren V, Tay BK, et al: Percutaneous plasma decompression alters cytokine expression in injured porcine intervertebral discs. Spine J 2004; 4: 88-98.
17 Hijikata S, Yamgishi M, Nakayama T, Oornori K: Percutaneous discectomy: a new treatment method for lumbar disc herniation. J Toden Hosp 1975; 5: 5-13.
18 Alo KM, Wright RE, Sutcliffe J, Brandt SA: Percutaneous lumbar discectomy: one-year follow-up in an initial cohort of fifty consecutive patients with chronic radicular pain. Pain Practice 2005; 5: 116-24.
19 Choy OS: Responses of extruded intervertebral herniated discs to percutaneous laser disc decompression. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2001; 19: 15-20.
20 Van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM: Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic reviewal' randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine 1997; 22: 2128-56.