Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2022.25.1.21

Significance of Follow-Up Ultrasonography 24 Hours Post-Reduction in Detecting Intussusception Recurrence  

Kim, Sujin (Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Lim, HyeJi (Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Park, Sowon (Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Koh, Hong (Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition / v.25, no.1, 2022 , pp. 21-29 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to identify the significance of 24-hour post-reduction ultrasonography (US) in pediatric patients with intussusception. Methods: A total of 229 patients with intussusception who were treated with saline reduction at Severance Children's Hospital between January 2014 and September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The 229 patients with successful saline reduction were divided into two groups: a recurrence at 24 hours group (R, n=41) and a non-recurrence group (NR, n=188). The full patient sample was divided into two groups: follow-up US (FU) or no follow-up US (NFU); the recurrence group was divided into follow-up (R-FU) and non-follow-up (R-NFU) subgroups, and stratified analyses were performed. Results: There were no significant differences in age, sex, laboratory findings, symptoms, and sonographic findings between the NR and R groups. In the R group, 24 patients underwent follow-up US, and 17 patients did not. Specific sonographic findings were statistically significant in the R-FU group compared to the R-NFU group (p=0.002). The R-FU group had fewer admissions (p=0.012) and longer mean hospitalization times (p<0.001) than the R-NFU group. The NFU group had a 12.2% recurrence rate, while the R-FU group recurrence rate was 25.8% (p=0.0099), suggesting that the omission of some recurrent events and follow-up US was a significant variable in the recurrence of intussusception. The median time to recurrence was 21 hours which supports the 24-hour follow-up protocol. Conclusion: Twenty-four-hour follow-up US was shown to be valuable for detecting early recurrence of intussusception.
Keywords
Intussusception; Pediatrics; Recurrence; Ultrasonography;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Al-Jazaeri A, Yazbeck S, Filiatrault D, Beaudin M, Emran M, Butter A. Utility of hospital admission after successful enema reduction of ileocolic intussusception. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:1010-3.   DOI
2 Amuddhu SK, Chen Y, Nah SA. Inpatient admission versus emergency department management of intussusception in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2019;29:7-13.   DOI
3 Gilmore AW, Reed M, Tenenbein M. Management of childhood intussusception after reduction by enema. Am J Emerg Med 2011;29:1136-40.   DOI
4 Cho MJ, Nam CW, Choi SH, Hwang EH. Management of recurrent ileocolic intussusception. J Pediatr Surg 2020;55:2150-3.   DOI
5 Xie X, Wu Y, Wang Q, Zhao Y, Xiang B. Risk factors for recurrence of intussusception in pediatric patients: a retrospective study. J Pediatr Surg 2018;53:2307-11.   DOI
6 Guo WL, Hu ZC, Tan YL, Sheng M, Wang J. Risk factors for recurrent intussusception in children: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e018604.   DOI
7 Espinoza Vega ML, Martin Rivada A, Rico Espineira C, De Lucio Rodriguez M, Guillen Redondo P, Luis Huertas AL, et al. [Recurrence of uncomplicated intestinal intussusception. Can it be treated as an outpatient?]. Cir Pediatr 2017;30:95-9. Spanish.
8 Herwig K, Brenkert T, Losek JD. Enema-reduced intussusception management: is hospitalization necessary? Pediatr Emerg Care 2009;25:74-7.   DOI
9 Lee EH, Yang HR. Nationwide population-based epidemiologic study on childhood intussusception in South Korea: emphasis on treatment and outcomes. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr 2020;23:329-45.   DOI
10 Bruce J, Huh YS, Cooney DR, Karp MP, Allen JE, Jewett TC Jr. Intussusception: evolution of current management. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1987;6:663-74.   DOI
11 Tate JE, Simonsen L, Viboud C, Steiner C, Patel MM, Curns AT, et al. Trends in intussusception hospitalizations among US infants, 1993-2004: implications for monitoring the safety of the new rotavirus vaccination program. Pediatrics 2008;121:e1125-32.   DOI
12 Lioubashevsky N, Hiller N, Rozovsky K, Segev L, Simanovsky N. Ileocolic versus small-bowel intussusception in children: can US enable reliable differentiation? Radiology 2013;269:266-71.   DOI
13 Beres AL, Baird R. An institutional analysis and systematic review with meta-analysis of pneumatic versus hydrostatic reduction for pediatric intussusception. Surgery 2013;154:328-34.   DOI
14 Otero HJ, White AM, Khwaja AB, Griffis H, Katcoff H, Bresnahan BW. Imaging intussusception in children's hospitals in the United States: trends, outcomes, and costs. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16:1636-44.   DOI
15 Simanovsky N, Issachar O, Koplewitz B, Lev-Cohain N, Rekhtman D, Hiller N. Early recurrence of ileocolic intussusception after successful air enema reduction: incidence and predisposing factors. Emerg Radiol 2019;26:1-4.   DOI
16 Kwon H, Lee JH, Jeong JH, Yang HR, Kwak YH, Kim DK, et al. A practice guideline for postreduction management of intussusception of children in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2019;35:533-8.   DOI
17 Gray MP, Li SH, Hoffmann RG, Gorelick MH. Recurrence rates after intussusception enema reduction: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2014;134:110-9.   DOI
18 Daneman A, Navarro O. Intussusception. Part 2: an update on the evolution of management. Pediatr Radiol 2004;34:97-108; quiz 187.   DOI
19 Mallicote MU, Isani MA, Roberts AS, Jones NE, Bowen-Jallow KA, Burke RV, et al. Discussion of: "hospital admission unnecessary for successful uncomplicated radiographic reduction of pediatric intussusception". Am J Surg 2017;214:1208-9.   DOI
20 Eklof O, Reiter S. Recurrent intussusception. Analysis of a series treated with hydrostatic reduction. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1978;19(1B):250-8.   DOI
21 Litz CN, Amankwah EK, Polo RL, Sakmar KA, Danielson PD, Chandler NM. Outpatient management of intussusception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2019;54:1316-23.   DOI
22 Lee DH, Kim SJ, Lee HJ, Jang HJ. Identifying predictive factors for the recurrence of pediatric intussusception. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr 2019;22:142-51.   DOI
23 Bajaj L, Roback MG. Postreduction management of intussusception in a children's hospital emergency department. Pediatrics 2003;112(6 Pt 1:1302-7.   DOI