Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2018.21.2.93

Usefulness of Assessment of Stool Form by the Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale in Primary Care Pediatrics  

Gulati, Reema (Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
Komuravelly, Arpitha (Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
Leb, Stephen (Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
Mhanna, Maroun J (Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
Ghori, Abdullah (Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
Leon, Janeen (Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
Needlman, Robert (Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition / v.21, no.2, 2018 , pp. 93-100 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Rome criteria are considered the gold standard for diagnosing functional constipation. The modified Bristol stool form scale (m-BSFS) was validated to measure stool form in children. However, neither the potential use of the m-BSFS as a tool to facilitate the diagnosis of potential constipation, nor the agreement between m-BSFS and stool consistency by Rome has been studied. Our objective is to determine if m-BSFS is a reliable tool to facilitate detection of constipation; and the agreement between stool form by m-BSFS and hard stool criteria in Rome. Methods: A survey tool with the Rome III criteria and the m-BSFS was developed. A Likert-scale addressed frequency of each stool form on the m-BSFS. Responses to Rome III and m-BSFS were compared. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the m-BSFS was 79.2% and 66.0% respectively; and in children <4 years. improved to 81.2% and 75.0% respectively. There was poor agreement between hard stools by m-BSFS and the painful or hard bowel movement question of Rome Criteria. Conclusion: The potential utility of m-BSFS as a reasonably good tool to facilitate the diagnosis of potential constipation in children is shown. The poor agreement between painful or hard stool question in Rome III, and ratings for hard stool on the m-BSFS illustrates that one's perception may differ between a question and a picture. A useful pictorial tool to appraise stool form may, thus, be a favorable complement in the process of enquiry about bowel habits in well-child care.
Keywords
Constipation; Rome criteria; Modified Bristol form; Stool consistency;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 van den Berg MM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of childhood constipation: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2401-9.   DOI
2 Mugie SM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2011;25:3-18.
3 Baker SS, Liptak GS, Colletti RB, Croffie JM, Di Lorenzo C, Ector W, et al. Constipation in infants and children: evaluation and treatment. A medical position statement of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999;29:612-26.   DOI
4 Uc A, Hyman PE, Walker LS. Functional gastrointestinal disorders in African American children in primary care. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006;42:270-4.   DOI
5 Burgers R, Bonanno E, Madarena E, Graziano F, Pensabene L, Gardner W, et al. The care of constipated children in primary care in different countries. Acta Paediatr 2012;101:677-80.   DOI
6 Youssef NN, Langseder AL, Verga BJ, Mones RL, Rosh JR. Chronic childhood constipation is associated with impaired quality of life: a case-controlled study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2005;41:56-60.   DOI
7 Rappaport L, Landman G, Fenton T, Levine MD. Locus of control as predictor of compliance and outcome in treatment of encopresis. J Pediatr 1986;109:1061-4.   DOI
8 Liem O, Harman J, Benninga M, Kelleher K, Mousa H, Di Lorenzo C. Health utilization and cost impact of childhood constipation in the United States. J Pediatr 2009;154:258-62.   DOI
9 Sommers T, Corban C, Sengupta N, Jones M, Cheng V, Bollom A, et al. Emergency department burden of constipation in the United States from 2006 to 2011. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:572-9.   DOI
10 Bongers ME, van Wijk MP, Reitsma JB, Benninga MA. Long-term prognosis for childhood constipation: clinical outcomes in adulthood. Pediatrics 2010;126:e156-62.   DOI
11 Loening-Baucke V. Constipation in early childhood: patient characteristics, treatment, and longterm follow up. Gut 1993;34:1400-4.   DOI
12 Zaslavsky C, da Silveira TR, Maguilnik I. Total and segmental colonic transit time with radio-opaque markers in adolescents with functional constipation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998;27:138-42.   DOI
13 Arbuckle RA, Carson RT, Abetz-Webb L, Hyams J, Di Lorenzo C, Lewis BE, et al. Measuring the symptoms of pediatric constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: expert commentary and literature review. Patient 2014;7:343-64.   DOI
14 Tabbers MM, DiLorenzo C, Berger MY, Faure C, Langendam MW, Nurko S, et al. Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014;58:258-74.
15 Carmo RL, Oliveira RP, Ribeiro AE, Lima MC, Amorim BJ, Ribeiro AF, et al. Colonic transit in children and adolescents with chronic constipation. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2015;91:386-91.   DOI
16 Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:920-4.   DOI
17 Degen LP, Phillips SF. How well does stool form reflect colonic transit? Gut 1996;39:109-13.   DOI
18 Chumpitazi BP, Lane MM, Czyzewski DI, Weidler EM, Swank PR, Shulman RJ. Creation and initial evaluation of a Stool Form Scale for children. J Pediatr 2010;157:594-7.   DOI
19 van Tilburg MA, Rouster A, Silver D, Pellegrini G, Gao J, Hyman PE. Development and validation of a Rome III functional gastrointestinal disorders questionnaire for infants and toddlers. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2016;62:384-6.   DOI
20 Lane MM, Czyzewski DI, Chumpitazi BP, Shulman RJ. Reliability and validity of a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for children. J Pediatr 2011;159:437-41.e1.   DOI
21 Wald ER, Jagodzinski TD, Moyer SC, Wald A, Eickhoff JC, Edmonson MB. Validation and clinical utility of a bowel habit questionnaire in school-age children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011;53:520-3.
22 Loening-Baucke V. Prevalence rates for constipation and faecal and urinary incontinence. Arch Dis Child 2007;92:486-9.   DOI
23 Geoffrey RS, Cynthia B, Graham AB 3rd, Brown OW, Hardin A, Lessin HR, et al. 2014 recommendations for pediatric preventive health care. Pediatrics 2014;133:568-70.   DOI
24 Hagan JF, Shaw JS, Duncan PM. Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents. American Academy of Pediatrics; 2007.
25 Loening-Baucke V. Chronic constipation in children. Gastroenterology 1993;105:1557-64.   DOI
26 Devanarayana NM, Rajindrajith S. Bowel habits and behaviors related to defecation in 10- to 16-year-olds: impact of socioeconomic characteristics and emotional stress. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011;52:569-73.   DOI
27 Russo M, Martinelli M, Sciorio E, Botta C, Miele E, Vallone G, et al. Stool consistency, but not frequency, correlates with total gastrointestinal transit time in children. J Pediatr 2013;162:1188-92.   DOI
28 Saps M, Nichols-Vinueza DX, Mintjens S, Pusatcioglu CK, Velasco-Benitez CA. Construct validity of the pediatric Rome III criteria. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014;59:577-81.   DOI