Browse > Article

Development of Adjustable Head holder Couch in H&N Cancer Radiation Therapy  

Shim, JaeGoo (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Song, KiWon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Kim, JinMan (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Park, MyoungHwan (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Society for Radiation Therapy / v.26, no.1, 2014 , pp. 43-50 More about this Journal
Abstract
In case of all patients who receive radiation therapy, a treatment plan is established and all steps of treatment are planned in the same geometrical condition. In case of head and neck cancer patients who undergo simulated treatment through computed tomography (CT), patients are fixed onto a table for planning, but laid on the top of the treatment table in the radiation therapy room. This study excogitated and fabricated an adjustable holder for head and neck cancer patients to fix patient's position and geometrical discrepancies when performing radiation therapy on head and neck cancer patients, and compared the error before and after adjusting the position of patients due to difference in weight to evaluate the correlation between patients' weight and range of error. Computed tomography system(High Advantage, GE, USA) is used for phantom to maintain the supine position to acquire the images of the therapy site for IMRT. IMRT 4MV X-rays was used by applying the LINAC(21EX, Varian, U.S.A). Treatment planning system (Pinnacle, ver. 9.1h, Philips, Madison, USA) was used. The setup accuracy was compared with each measurement was repeated five times for each weight (0, 15, and 30Kg) and CBCT was performed 30 times to find the mean and standard deviation of errors before and after the adjustment of each weight. SPSS ver.19.0(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL,USA) statistics program was used to perform the Wilcoxon Rank test for significance evaluation and the Spearman analysis was used as the tool to analyze the significance evaluation of the correlation of weight. As a result of measuring the error values from CBCT before and after adjusting the position due to the weight difference, X,Y,Z axis was $0.4{\pm}0.8mm$, $0.8{\pm}0.4mm$, 0 for 0Kg before the adjustment. In 15Kg CBCT before and after adjusting the position due to the weight difference, X,Y,Z axis was $0.2{\pm}0.8mm$, $1.2{\pm}0.4mm$, $2.0{\pm}0.4mm$. After adjusting position was X,Y,Z axis was $0.2{\pm}0.4mm$, $0.4{\pm}0.5mm$, $0.4{\pm}0.5mm$. In 30Kg CBCT before and after adjusting the position due to the weight difference, X,Y,Z axis was $0.8{\pm}0.4mm$, $2.4{\pm}0.5mm$, $4.4{\pm}0.8mm$. After adjusting position was X,Y,Z axis was $0.6{\pm}0.5mm$, $1.0{\pm}0mm$, $0.6{\pm}0.5mm$. When the holder for the head and neck cancer was used to adjust the ab.0ove error value, the error values from CBCT were $0.2{\pm}0.8mm$ for the X axis, $0.40{\pm}0.54mm$ for Y axis, and 0 for Z axis. As a result of statistically analyzing each value before and after the adjustment the value was significant with p<0.034 at the Z axis with 15Kg of weight and with p<0.038 and p<0.041 at the Y and Z axes respectively with 30Kg of weight. There was a significant difference with p<0.008 when the analysis was performed through Kruscal-Wallis in terms of the difference in the adjusted values of the three weight groups. As it could reduce the errors, patients' reproduction could be improved for more precise and accurate radiation therapy. Development of an adjustable device for head and neck cancer patients is significant because it improves the reproduction of existing equipment by reducing the errors in patients' position.
Keywords
Radiotherapy; H&N Ca.; CBCT;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zheng Chang, Zhiheng Wang "6D image guidance for spinal non-invasive stereotactic body radiation therapy:Comparison between ExacTrac X-ray 6D with KV CBCT"Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2010;1:116-121
2 Barker JL. Jr, Garden AS. "Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head- and neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system" Radiation Oncology Biol. Physics, 2004;95:960-970
3 Zambon F, Hasselberg M, "Socioeconomic difference and motorcycle injuries: age at risk and injury severity among young drivers. A Swedish nationwide cohort study"Accid Anal Prev, 2006;38:1183-9   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, "Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy" Radiation Oncology Biol. Physics, 2002;53:1337-1349   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Pouliot J, Bani-Hashemi A", Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiation therapy" Radiation Oncology Biol. Physics, 2005;61552-560
6 Van Herk M. " Different styles of image-guided radiotherapy"Seminar Radiation Oncology,2007;17:258- 267   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Thomas CW, Nichol AM, " An Anthropomorphic phantom study of visualisation of surgical clips for partial breast irradiation (PBI) setup verification" Radiotion Oncology, 2009;90:56-59
8 Van Herk M, Remeijer P," The probability of correct target dosage: dose population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy" Radiation Oncology,Biol Physics,2000;47:1121-1135
9 Mckenzie A, Van Herk M, " For geometrical uncertainties around organ at risk"Radiotherapy Oncology, 2002;62:299-307   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Astreinidou E, Raaijmarkers C, "Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in H&N IMRT" Radiation Oncology Biol Physics, 2005;61:938-944   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Manning MA, Wu Q." The effect of setup uncertainty on normal tissue sparing with IMRT for head-and-neck cancer" Radiation Oncology Biol Physics,2001;51: 1400- 1409
12 Height R, Khoo V." The dosimetric consequences of anatomic changes in head and neck radiotherapy patients"Med Imaging Radiation Oncology, 2010;54:497-504   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Loo H, Fairfoul J, "Tumour shrinkage and contour change during radiotherapy increase the dose to organs at risk but not the target volumes for head and neck cancer patients treated on the TomoTherapy HiArtTM System"Clinical Oncology, 2011;23:40-47   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Menke M, Hirschfeld F " Photogrammetric accuracy measurements of head holder systems used for fractionated radiotherapy"Radiation Oncology Biol Physics, 1994;29:1147-1155   DOI
15 Purdy JA." Dose-volume specification: New challenges with intensity-modulated radiation therapy "Seminar Radiation Oncology, 2002;12:199- 209   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Purdy JA."Future directions in 3-D treatment planning and delivery:A physicist's perspective" Radiation Oncology Biol Physics, 2000;46:3-6   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Rabinowitz I, Broomberg J "Accuracy of radiation field alignment in clinical practice"Radiation Oncology Biol Physics, 1985;11:1857-1867   DOI
18 Xing L, Lin ZX. "Dosimetric effects of patient displacement and collimator and gantry angle misalignment on intensity modulated radiation therapy"Radiother Oncology, 2000;56:97-108   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Wu Q, Chi Y. "Adaptive replanning strategies accounting for shrinkage in head and neck IMRT" Radiation Oncology Biol Physics, 2009;45:924-932