Dose verification for Gated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy according to Respiratory period

Purpose : The purpose of this study is to verify the accuracy of dose delivery according to the patient's breathing cycle in Gated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Materials and Methods : TrueBeam STxTM(Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA) was used in this experiment. The Computed tomography(CT) images that were acquired with RANDO Phantom(Alderson Research Laboratories Inc. Stamford. CT, USA), using Computerized treatment planning system(Eclipse 10.0, Varian, USA), were used to create VMAT plans using 10MV FFF with 1500 cGy/fx (case 1, 2, 3) and 220 cGy/fx(case 4, 5, 6) of doserate of 1200 MU/min. The regular respiratory period of 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 sec and the patients respiratory period of 2.2 and 3.5 sec were reproduced with the $QUASAR^{TM}$ Respiratory Motion Phantom(Modus Medical Devices Inc), and it was set up to deliver radiation at the phase mode between the ranges of 30 to 70%. The results were measured at respective respiratory conditions by a 2-Dimensional ion chamber array detector(I'mRT Matrixx, IBA Dosimetry, Germany) and a MultiCube Phantom(IBA Dosimetry, Germany), and the Gamma pass rate(3 mm, 3%) were compared by the IMRT analysis program(OmniPro I'mRT system software Version 1.7b, IBA Dosimetry, Germany) Results : The gamma pass rates of Case 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 were the results of 100.0, 97.6, 98.1, 96.3, 93.0, 94.8% at a regular respiratory period of 1.5 sec and 98.8, 99.5, 97.5, 99.5, 98.3, 99.6% at 2.5 sec, 99.6, 96.6, 97.5, 99.2, 97.8, 99.1% at 3.5 sec and 99.4, 96.3, 97.2, 99.0, 98.0, 99.3% at 4.5 sec, respectively. When a patient's respiration was reproduced, 97.7, 95.4, 96.2, 98.9, 96.2, 98.4% at average respiratory period of 2.2 sec, and 97.3, 97.5, 96.8, 100.0, 99.3, 99.8% at 3.5 sec, respectively. Conclusion : The experiment showed clinically reliable results of a Gamma pass rate of 95% or more when 2.5 sec or more of a regular breathing period and the patient's breathing were reproduced. While it showed the results of 93.0% and 94.8% at a regular breathing period of 1.5 sec of Case 5 and 6, it could be confirmed that the accurate dose delivery could be possible on the most respiratory conditions because based on the results of 100 patients's respiratory period analysis as no one sustained a respiration of 1.5 sec. But, pretreatment dose verification should be precede because we can't exclude the possibility of error occurrence due to extremely short respiratory period, also a training at the simulation and careful monitoring are necessary for a patient to maintain stable breathing. Consequently, more reliable and accurate treatments can be administered.

호흡연동 용적변조 회전방사선치료에서 호흡주기에 따른 선량전달 정확성 검증

목 적 : 호흡연동 용적변조 회전방사선치료(Gated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy)에서 환자의 호흡주기 변화에 따른 선량전달의 정확성을 검증하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 실험에는 TrueBeam STxTM(Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA)치료기를 사용하였다. 인체모형등가팬텀(Rando Phantom, Alderson Resarch Laboratories Inc. Stamford. CT, USA)의 전산화단층영상에 전산화치료계획시스템(Eclipse 10.0, Varian, USA)을 이용하여 10 MV FFF(Flatenning Filter Free), 선량률 1200 MU/min으로 1500 cGy/fx(Case1, 2, 3)과 220 cGy/fx(Case4, 5, 6)의 치료계획을 수립하였다. $QUASAR^{TM}$ Respiratory Motion Phantom(Modus Medical Devices Inc)을 이용하여 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 sec의 일정한 호흡주기와 평균호흡주기가 2.2, 3.5 sec인 환자의 호흡주기를 재현하였고 위상모드 30~70% 구간에서 방사선이 조사되도록 설정하였다. 각각의 호흡 조건에서 2차원 이온전리함 배열 검출기(I'mRT Matrixx, IBA Dosimetry, Germany)와 MultiCube Phantom(IBA Dosimetry, Germany)을 이용하여 측정하였고 세기변조 방사선치료 분석 프로그램(OmniPro I'mRT, IBA Dosimetry, Germany)을 이용하여 Gamma pass rate(3 mm, 3%)을 비교하였다. 결 과 : Case 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6의 Gamma pass rate은 일정한 호흡주기 1.5 sec에서 100.0, 97.6, 98.1, 96.3, 93.0, 94.8%, 2.5 sec에서 98.8, 99.5, 97.5, 99.5, 98.3, 99.6%, 3.5 sec에서 99.6, 96.6, 97.5, 99.2, 97.8, 99.1%, 4.5 sec에서 99.4, 96.3, 97.2, 99.0, 98.0, 99.3%의 결과를 보였다. 환자의 호흡을 재현한 경우 평균 호흡주기 2.2 sec에서는 97.7, 95.4, 96.2, 98.9, 96.2, 98.4%, 3.5 sec에서는 97.3, 97.5, 96.8, 100.0, 99.3 99.8%의 결과를 보였다. 결 론 : 2.5 sec이상의 일정한 호흡주기와 환자의 호흡을 재현한 실험에서 Gamma pass rate 95%이상의 임상적으로 신뢰할 만한 결과를 보였다. 일정한 호흡주기 1.5 sec의 Case 5, 6 에서 93.0, 94.8%의 결과를 보였으나 100명의 환자 호흡주기 분석 결과 1.5 sec의 호흡을 지속했던 경우는 없었던 점으로 보아 대부분의 호흡조건에서 정확한 선량전달이 가능함을 확인 하였다. 다만 극히 짧은 호흡주기로 인한 오차발생 가능성을 배제할 수 없기 때문에 치료전 선량전달 정확성 검증이 선행되어야 하며 모의치료시 환자 교육으로 안정된 호흡을 유지하고 정확한 모니터링을 통해 치료중 환자 호흡변화에 대처한다면 더욱 안정적이고 정확한 치료가 이루어질 것으로 사료된다.