Detecting Malignant Urothelial Cells by Morphometric Analysis of ![]() |
Shin, Bong-Kyung
(Department of Pathology, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College)
Lee, Young-Suk (Department of Pathology, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College) Jeong, Hoi-Seon (Department of Pathology, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College) Lee, Sang-Ho (Department of Pathology, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College) Kim, Hyun-Chul (Department of Pathology, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College) Kim, A-Ree (Department of Pathology, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College) Kim, In-Sun (Department of Pathology, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College) Kim, Han-Kyeom (Department of Pathology, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College) |
1 | Xin W, Raab SS, Michael CW. Low-grade urothelial carcinoma: reappraisal of the cytologic criteria on ThinPrep. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:125-9 DOI ScienceOn |
2 | Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG. Sensitivity and specificity of commonly available bladder tumor markers versus cytology: results of a comprehensive literature review and metaanalyses. Urology 2003;61:109-18 DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Nicol TL, Kelly D, Reynolds L, Rosenthal DL. Comparison of TriPath thin-layer technology with conventional methods on nongynecologic specimens. Acta Cytol 2000;44:567-75 DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Wright RG, Halford JA. Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology. Cytopathology 2001;12:306-13 DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Bishop JW, Sims KL. Cellular morphometry in nongynecologic thin-layer and filter cytologic specimens. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1998;20:257-67 |
6 | Tisserand P, Fouquet C, Marck V, et al.: ThinPrepprocessed fine-needle samples of breast are effective material for RNA- and DNA-based molecular diagnosis: application to p53 mutation analysis. Cancer 2003;99:223-32 DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Saad A, Hanbury DC, McNicholas TA, Boustead GB, Woodman AC. The early detection and diagnosis of bladder cancer: a critical review of the options. Eur Urol 2001;39:619-33 |
8 | van der Poel HG, Boon ME, van Stratum P, et al.: Conventional bladder wash cytology performed by four experts versus quantitative image analysis. Mod Pathol 1997;10:976-82 DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Pondo A CB, Gupta PK. Use of Thinprep in urine cytology (Abstract). Acta Cytol 1992;37:584 |
10 | Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG. Sensitivity and specificity of commonly available bladder tumor markers versus cytology: results of a comprehensive literature review and metaanalyses. Urology 2003;61:discussion 118 DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Planz B, Jochims E, Deix T, Caspers HP, Jakse G, Boecking A. The role of urinary cytology for detection of bladder cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:304-8 DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Skacel M, Fahmy M, Brainard JA, et al.: Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology. J Urol 2003;169:2101-5 DOI ScienceOn |
13 | Anagnostopoulou I SH, Rammou-Kinnia R, Karakitsos P, Gianni I, Georgoulakis J, Kittas C. Comparative study of Thinprep and conventional voided urine cytology (Abstract). Cytopathology 2000;11:373 |
14 | Piaton E, Faynel J, Hutin K, Ranchin MC, Cottier M. Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep processing of urinary samples: a qualitative approach. BMC Clin Pathol 2005;5:9. DOI |
15 | Elsheikh TM, Kirkpatrick JL, Wu HH. Comparison of ThinPrep and cytospin preparations in the evaluation of exfoliative cytology specimens. Cancer 2006;108:144-9 DOI ScienceOn |
16 | Piaton E, Hutin K, Faynel J, Ranchin MC, Cottier M. Cost efficiency analysis of modern cytocentrifugation methods versus liquid based (Cytyc Thinprep) processing of urinary samples. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:1208-12 DOI ScienceOn |
17 | Nassar H, Ali-Fehmi R, Madan S. Use of ThinPrep monolayer technique and cytospin preparation in urine cytology: a comparative analysis. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;28:115-8 DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Bastacky S, Ibrahim S, Wilczynski SP, Murphy WM. The accuracy of urinary cytology in daily practice. Cancer 1999;87:118-28 DOI |
19 | Papillo JL, Lapen D. Cell yield. ThinPrep vs. cytocentrifuge. Acta Cytol 1994;38:33-6 |
20 | Luthra UK, Dey P, George J, et al.: Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations: urine cytology evaluation. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;21:364-6 DOI ScienceOn |
![]() |