1 |
Sasieni P, Adams J. Effect of screening on cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales: analysis of trends with an age period cohort model BMJ 1999;318:1244-5
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Williams ARW: Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods. Cytopathol 2006;17:82-5
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Dziura B, Quinn S, Richard K: Performance of an Imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. Acta Ctyol 2006;50:309-11
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Fahey MT, Irwig L, Macaskill P. Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141:680-9
DOI
|
5 |
Richards A, Farnsworth A, Davey E,Irwig L. Is the ThinPrep imaging system the future of cervical screening in Australia? BMJ (in press)
|
6 |
Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and practice of screening or disease World Health Organisation. Geneva: WHO. Public Health Paper, 1968
|
7 |
Payne N, Chilcott J, McGoogan E. Liquid-based cytology for cervical screening. Health Technol Assess 2000;4:1-73
|
8 |
Moss SM, Gray A, Legood R, et al. Cervical Screening LBC Pilot Studies. 2003, www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/research.html
|
9 |
Quinn M, Babb P, Jones J, Allen E. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England : evaluation based on routinely collected statistics BMJ 1999;318:904-8
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Gemmen EK, Blackburne RE, Ulrich UJ, van Engen AK, Partlow KL.A health economic model to determine the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening methods. J Lower Genit Tract Dis 2006;10:197 Abstract
|
11 |
Davey E, Barratt A, Irwig L et al. Effect of Study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid based cytology versus conventional cytology: a systematic review. Lancet 2006;367:122-32
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Cibas ES, Hong X, Crum CP, Feldman S. Age-specific detection of high-risk HPV DNA in cytologically normal, computer-imaged ThinPrep papanicolaou samples. Gynecol Oncol 2007;104:702-6
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Evaluation of Cervical Cytology Technology Abstract: number 5, AHCPR publication 1999-00-E010
|
14 |
Lozano R. Comparison of computer assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology. Gynecol Oncol 2006;104:134-8
|
15 |
Biscotti CV, O'Brien DL, Gero MA, Gramlich TL, Kennedy AW, Easley KA: Thin-layer Pap test vs. conventional Pap smear: analysis of 400 split sample studies. J Reprod Med 2002;47:9-13
|
16 |
Richart RM, Masood S, Syrjanen KJ. HPV immortalization of human oral epithelial cells: a model for carcinogenesis. Acta Cytol 1998;42:50-8
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers Er, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:810-19
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Scottish Cervical Screening Programme http://www.show.scot.nhs.uk/sehd/publications/ScreeningLiquidCytologyv2.pdf. 2002;1:1-51
|