A Nationwide Analysis Evaluating the Safety of Using Acellular Dermal Matrix with Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction |
Jessica Luo
(Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine)
Whitney D. Moss (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine) Giovanna R. Pires (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine) Irfan A. Rhemtulla (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine) Megan Rosales (Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine) Gregory J. Stoddard (Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine) Jayant P. Agarwal (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine) Alvin C. Kwok (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine) |
1 | Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Products Used in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Differ in Complication Rates. FDA Safety Communication. Accessed April 24, 2021, at: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/acellular-dermal-matrix-adm-products-used-implant-based-breast-reconstruction-differ-complication |
2 | Winocour S, Martinez-Jorge J, Habermann E, Thomsen K, Lemaine V. Early surgical site infection following tissue expander breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: national benchmarking using national surgical quality improvement program. Arch Plast Surg 2015;42(02):194-200 DOI |
3 | Ibrahim AM, Koolen PG, Ashraf AA, et al. Acellular dermal matrix in reconstructive breast surgery: survey of current practice among plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3(04):e381 |
4 | Uroskie TW, Colen LB. History of breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2004;18(02):65-69 DOI |
5 | Gruber RP, Kahn RA, Lash H, Maser MR, Apfelberg DB, Laub DR. Breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a comparison of submuscular and subcutaneous techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;67(03):312-317 DOI |
6 | DeLong MR, Tandon VJ, Bertrand AA, et al. Review of outcomes in prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction with and without surgical mesh assistance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;147(02):305-315 DOI |
7 | Craig ES, Clemens MW, Koshy JC, et al. Outcomes of acellular dermal matrix for immediate tissue expander reconstruction with radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study. Aesthet Surg J 2019;39(03):279-288 DOI |
8 | Safran T, Al-Halabi B, Viezel-Mathieu A, Boileau JF, Dionisopoulos T. Skin-reducing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral reconstruction: surgical, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes with and without dermal matrices. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;147(05):1046-1057 DOI |
9 | Ganesh Kumar N, Berlin NL, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Kozlow JH, Wilkins EG. Development of an evidence-based approach to the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74(01):30-40 DOI |
10 | Surgeons AC. User Guide for the 2016 ACS NSQIP Participant Use File. 2018 |
11 | Wong AK, Schonmeyer BH, Singh P, Carlson DL, Li S, Mehrara BJ. Histologic analysis of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in acellular human dermis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121(04):1144-1152 DOI |
12 | Ibrahim AMS, Shuster M, Koolen PGL, et al. Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132(05):1057-1066 DOI |
13 | Daar DA, Gandy JR, Clark EG, Mowlds DS, Paydar KZ, Wirth GA. Plastic surgery and acellular dermal matrix: highlighting trends from 1999 to 2013. World J Plast Surg 2016;5(02):97-108 |
14 | Margulies IG, Salzberg CA. The use of acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction: evolution of techniques over 2 decades. Gland Surg 2019;8(01):3-10 DOI |
15 | Hallberg H, Rafnsdottir S, Selvaggi G, et al. Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2018;52(03):130-147 DOI |
16 | Bi S, Liu R, Wu B, et al. Breast implants for mammaplasty: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020;44(06):1988-1996 DOI |
17 | Lee KT, Mun GH. Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(02):600-610 DOI |
18 | Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, Hwang BH, Chan LS, Wong AK. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68(04):346-356 DOI |
19 | Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Kim JYS. Seroma in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137(04):1104-1116 DOI |
20 | Lohmander F, Lagergren J, Roy PG, et al. Implant based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: safety data from an open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in the setting of breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg 2019;269(05):836-841 DOI |
21 | Bachour Y, Bargon CA, de Blok CJM, Ket JCF, Ritt MJPF, Niessen FB. Risk factors for developing capsular contracture in women after breast implant surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018;71(09):e29-e48 DOI |
22 | Gravina PR, Pettit RW, Davis MJ, Winocour SJ, Selber JC. Evidence for the use of acellular dermal matrix in implant-based breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2019;33(04):229-235 DOI |
23 | Scheflan M, Allweis TM, Ben Yehuda D, Maisel Lotan A. Meshed acellular dermal matrix in immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020;8(11):e3265 |
24 | Maisel Lotan A, Ben Yehuda D, Allweis TM, Scheflan M. Comparative study of meshed and nonmeshed acellular dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144(05):1045-1053 DOI |
25 | Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K. Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg 2015;42(05):532-543 DOI |
26 | Hidalgo DA, Weinstein AL. Surgical treatment for capsular contracture: a new paradigm and algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146(03):516-525 DOI |
27 | Dikmans RE, Negenborn VL, Bouman MB, et al. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18(02):251-258 DOI |
28 | Bank J, Phillips NA, Park JE, Song DH. Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37(06):1194-1201 DOI |
29 | Aliotta RE, Duraes EFR, Scomacao I, et al. A controlled cost and outcomes analysis of acellular dermal matrix and implant-based reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020;74(06):1229-1238 |
30 | de Blacam C, Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, Slavin SA, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Cost analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 2012;69(05):516-520 DOI |
31 | Alluri RK, Leland H, Heckmann N. Surgical research using national databases. Ann Transl Med 2016;4(20):393 |