Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756351

Learners' Responses to a Virtual Cadaver Dissection Nerve Course in the COVID Era: A Survey Study  

Lisiecki, Jeffrey L. (Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School)
Johnson, Shepard Peir (Section of Plastic Surgery & Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School)
Grant, David (Section of Plastic Surgery & Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School)
Chung, Kevin C. (Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.49, no.5, 2022 , pp. 676-682 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background Virtual education is an evolving method for teaching medical learners. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, remote learning has provided a replacement for conferences, lectures, and meetings, but has not been described as a method for conducting a cadaver dissection. We aim to demonstrate how learners perceive a virtual cadaver dissection as an alternative to live dissection. Methods A virtual cadaver dissection was performed to demonstrate several upper extremity nerve procedures. These procedures were livestreamed as part of an educational event with multimedia and interactive audience questions. Participants were queried both during and after the session regarding their perceptions of this teaching modality. Results Attendance of a virtual dissection held for three plastic surgery training institutions began at 100 and finished with 70 participants. Intrasession response rates from the audience varied between 68 and 75%, of which 75% strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the virtual environment. The audience strongly agreed or agreed that the addition of multimedia captions (88%), magnified video loupe views (82%), and split-screen multicast view (64%) was beneficial. Postsession response rate was 27%, and generally reflected a positive perspective about the content of the session. Conclusions Virtual cadaver dissection is an effective modality for teaching surgical procedures and can be enhanced through technologies such as video loupes and multiple camera perspectives. The audience viewed the virtual cadaver dissection as a beneficial adjunct to surgical education. This format may also make in-person cadaver courses more effective by improving visualization and allowing for anatomic references to be displayed synchronously.
Keywords
education; learning; anatomy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Wlodarczyk JR, Wolfswinkel EM, Carey JN. COVID-19 video conferencing: preserving resident education with online meeting platforms. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146(01):e110-e111   DOI
2 Metchik A, Boyd S, Kons Z, et al. How we do it: implementing a virtual, multi-institutional collaborative education model for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Surg Educ 2021;78(04):1041-1045   DOI
3 Ten Eyck RP, Tews M, Ballester JM. Improved medical student satisfaction and test performance with a simulation-based emergency medicine curriculum: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2009;54(05):684-691   DOI
4 Rehim SA, Chung KC. Educational video recording and editing for the hand surgeon. J Hand Surg Am 2015;40(05):1048-1054   DOI
5 Stain SC, Mitchell M, Belue R, et al. Objective assessment of videoconferenced lectures in a surgical clerkship. Am J Surg 2005;189(01):81-84   DOI
6 Klima S, Cornwall J, Kieser D, Hammer N. The utility and benefit of a newly established postgraduate training course in surgical exposures for orthopedic and trauma surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019;139(12):1673-1680   DOI
7 James HK, Chapman AW, Pattison GTR, Griffin DR, Fisher JD. Author response to: Comment on: systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training. Br J Surg 2020;107(04):468
8 Go PM, Payne JH Jr, Satava RM, Rosser JC. Teleconferencing bridges two oceans and shrinks the surgical world. Surg Endosc 1996;10 (02):105-106   DOI
9 Morgan M, Aydin A, Salih A, Robati S, Ahmed K. Current status of simulation-based training tools in orthopedic surgery: a systematic review. J Surg Educ 2017;74(04):698-716   DOI
10 Holland JP, Waugh L, Horgan A, Paleri V, Deehan DJ. Cadaveric hands-on training for surgical specialties: is this back to the future for surgical skills development? J Surg Educ 2011;68(02):110-116   DOI
11 Hadley GP, Mars M. Postgraduate medical education in paediatric surgery: videoconferencing-a possible solution for Africa? Pediatr Surg Int 2008;24(02):223-226   DOI
12 Davis CR, Rosenfield LK. Looking at plastic surgery through Google Glass: part 1. Systematic review of Google Glass evidence and the first plastic surgical procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135(03):918-928   DOI
13 Kirkpatrick D, Kirkpatrick J. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers; San Fransisco: 2006
14 Graves SN, Shenaq DS, Langerman AJ, Song DH. Video capture of plastic surgery procedures using the GoPro HERO 3+. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3(02):e312   DOI
15 Yuen JC, Gonzalez SR. Addressing the surgical training gaps caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: an opportunity for implementing standards for remote surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146(01):109e-110e   DOI
16 Kogan M, Klein SE, Hannon CP, Nolte MT. Orthopaedic education during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020;28(11):e456-e464   DOI
17 Moore W. The Knife Man: Blood, Body Snatching, and the Birth of Modern Surgery. New York: Broadway Books; 2005
18 Ali J, Adam RU, Sammy I, Ali E, Williams JI. The simulated Trauma Patient Teaching Module-does it improve student performance? J Trauma 2007;62(06):1416-1420
19 Martin-Smith JD, McArdle A, Carroll SM, Kelly EJ. Webinar: a useful tool in plastic surgery specialty trainee education. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68(09):1323-1324   DOI
20 Vara AD, Wu J, Shin AY, Sobol G, Wiater B. Video recording with a GoPro in hand and upper extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2016;41(10):e383-e387   DOI