Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751103

Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction  

Merchant, Alisha (Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich)
Speck, Nicole E. (Plastic Surgery Group)
Michalak, Michal (Department of Computer Science and Statistics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences)
Schaefer, Dirk J. (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Basel)
Farhadi, Jian (Plastic Surgery Group)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.49, no.4, 2022 , pp. 494-500 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background Seroma formation is the most common donor site complication following autologous breast reconstruction, along with hematoma. Seroma may lead to patient discomfort and may prolong hospital stay or delay adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to compare seroma rates between the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG), and superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) donor sites. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study consisting of chart review of all patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from April 2018 to June 2020. The primary outcome studied was frequency of seroma formation at the different donor sites. The secondary outcome evaluated potential prognostic properties associated with seroma formation. Third, the number of donor site seroma evacuations was compared between the three donor sites. Results Overall, 242 breast reconstructions were performed in 189 patients. Demographic data were found statistically comparable between the three flap cohorts, except for body mass index (BMI). Frequency of seroma formation was highest at the SGAP donor site (75.0%), followed by the TMG (65.0%), and DIEP (28.6%) donor sites. No association was found between seroma formation and BMI, age at surgery, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or DIEP laterality. The mean number of seroma evacuations was significantly higher in the SGAP and the TMG group compared with the DIEP group. Conclusion This study provides a single center's experience regarding seroma formation at the donor site after microsurgical breast reconstruction. The observed rate of donor site seroma formation was comparably high, especially in the TMG and SGAP group, necessitating an adaption of the surgical protocol.
Keywords
seroma; mammaplasty; surgical flaps; microsurgery;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Janis JE, Khansa L, Khansa I. Strategies for postoperative seroma prevention: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;138(01):240-252   DOI
2 Pollock H, Pollock T. Progressive tension sutures: a technique to reduce local complications in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105(07):2583-2586   DOI
3 Warner JP, Gutowski KA. Abdominoplasty with progressive tension closure using a barbed suture technique. Aesthet Surg J 2009;29(03):221-225   DOI
4 Nagarkar P, Lakhiani C, Cheng A, Lee M, Teotia S, Saint-Cyr M. Nodrain DIEP flap donor-site closure using barbed progressive tension sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;4(04):e672   DOI
5 Salgarello M, Tambasco D, Farallo E. DIEP flap donor site versus elective abdominoplasty short-term complication rates: a meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012;36(02):363-369   DOI
6 Chow WTH, Oni G, Ramakrishnan VV, Griffiths M. The use of plasmakinetic cautery compared to conventional electrocautery for dissection of abdominal free flap for breast reconstruction: single-centre, randomized controlled study. Gland Surg 2019;8(03):242-248   DOI
7 Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Bidros RS, et al. Bilateral breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: an experience with 280 flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52(03):246-252   DOI
8 Lee D, Jung BK, Roh TS, Kim YS. Ultrasonic dissection versus electrocautery for immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2020;47(01):20-25   DOI
9 Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113(04):1153-1160   DOI
10 Rousseau P, Vincent H, Potier B, Arnaud D, Darsonval V. Diather-mocoagulation in cutting mode and large flap dissection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127(05):2093-2098   DOI
11 Sadeghi A, Malata C. CASE REPORT persistent seromas in abdominal free flap donor sites after postmastectomy breast reconstruction surgery: case reports and literature review. Eplasty 2013;13:e24
12 Munder B, Andree C, Witzel C, et al. The DIEP flap as well-established method of choice for autologous breast reconstruction with a low complication rate - retrospective single-centre 10-year experience. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020;80(06):628-638   DOI
13 Modarressi A, Muller CT, Montet X, Ruegg EM, Pittet-Cuenod B. DIEP flap for breast reconstruction: is abdominal fat thickness associated with post-operative complications? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017;70(08):1068-1075   DOI
14 Andrades P, Prado A. Composition of postabdominoplasty seroma. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007;31(05):514-518   DOI
15 Bae SH, Lee YW, Nam SB, et al. Recurrent late seroma after immediate breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. Arch Plast Surg 2020;47(03):267-271   DOI
16 Lakhiani C, DeFazio MV, Han K, Falola R, Evans K. Donor-site morbidity following free tissue harvest from the thigh: a systematic review and pooled analysis of complications. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016;32(05):342-357   DOI
17 Blondeel PN. The sensate free superior gluteal artery perforator (S-GAP) flap: a valuable alternative in autologous breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52(03):185-193   DOI
18 Gupta D, Lis CG. Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Nutr J 2010;9:69   DOI
19 Seidenstuecker K, Munder B, Mahajan AL, Richrath P, Behrendt P, Andree C. Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127(03):1086-1092   DOI
20 Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Sieber B, et al. Free tissue transfer in the obese patient: an outcome and cost analysis in 1258 consecutive abdominally based reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131(05):681e-692e   DOI
21 Kontos M, Petrou A, Prassas E, et al. Pressure dressing in breast surgery: is this the solution for seroma formation? J BUON 2008;13(01):65-67
22 Marsh DJ, Fox A, Grobbelaar AO, Chana JS. Abdominoplasty and seroma: a prospective randomised study comparing scalpel and handheld electrocautery dissection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68(02):192-196   DOI
23 Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Browne JP, et al. Findings of a national comparative audit ofmastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery in England. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67(10):1333-1344   DOI
24 von Meyenfeldt M. Cancer-associated malnutrition: an introduction. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2005;9(Suppl 2):S35-S38   DOI
25 Nedomansky J, Nickl S, Radtke C, Haslik W, Schroegendorfer KF. Venous superdrainage in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: the impact of superficial inferior epigastric vein dissection on abdominal seroma formation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141(02):206e-212e   DOI
26 Zoccali G, Molina A, Farhadi J. Is long-term post-operative monitoring of microsurgical flaps still necessary? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017;70(08):996-1000   DOI
27 Lindenblatt N, Gruenherz L, Farhadi J. A systematic review of donor site aesthetic and complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2019;8(04):389-398   DOI
28 Xu H, Dong J, Wang T. Bipedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for unilateral breast reconstruction: seven years' experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124(06):1797-1807   DOI
29 Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Bidros RS, Gill PS, Dupin CL, Allen RJ. Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flaps: a critical analysis of 142 cases. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52(02):118-125   DOI
30 Klink CD, Binnebosel M, Lucas AH, et al. Serum analyses for protein, albumin and IL-1-RA serve as reliable predictors for seroma formation after incisional hernia repair. Hernia 2011;15(01):69-73   DOI
31 Liang DG, Dusseldorp JR, van Schalkwyk C, et al. Running barbed suture quilting reduces abdominal drainage in perforator-based breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016;69(01):42-47   DOI
32 Sforza M, Husein R, Andjelkov K, Rozental-Fernandes PC, Zaccheddu R, Jovanovic M. Use of quilting sutures during abdominoplasty to prevent seroma formation: are they really effective? Aesthet Surg J 2015;35(05):574-580   DOI