Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.01949

Lymphovenous anastomoses with three-dimensional digital hybrid visualization: improving ergonomics for supermicrosurgery in lymphedema  

Will, Patrick A. (Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Centre, BG-Trauma Hospital Ludwigshafen)
Hirche, Christoph (Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Centre, BG-Trauma Hospital Ludwigshafen)
Berner, Juan Enrique (Kellogg College, University of Oxford)
Kneser, Ulrich (Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Centre, BG-Trauma Hospital Ludwigshafen)
Gazyakan, Emre (Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Centre, BG-Trauma Hospital Ludwigshafen)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.48, no.4, 2021 , pp. 427-432 More about this Journal
Abstract
The conventional approach of looking down a microscope to perform microsurgical procedures is associated with occupational injuries, anti-ergonomic postures, and increased tremor and fatigue, all of which predispose microsurgeons to early retirement. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) visualization of real-time microscope magnification has been developed as an alternative. Despite its commercial availability, no supermicrosurgical procedures have been reported using this technology to date. Lymphovenous anastomoses (LVAs) often require suturing vessels with diameters of 0.2-0.8 mm, thus representing the ultimate microsurgical challenge. After performing the first documented LVA procedure using 3D-augmented visualization in our unit and gaining experience with this technique, we conducted an anonymized in-house survey among microsurgeons who had used this approach. The participants considered that 3D visualization for supermicrosurgery was equivalent in terms of handling, optical detail, depth resolution, and safety to conventional binocular magnification. This survey revealed that team communication, resident education, and ergonomics were superior using 3D digital hybrid visualization. Postoperative muscle fatigue, tremor, and pain were also reduced. The major drawbacks of the 3D visualization microscopic systems are the associated costs, required space, and difficulty of visualizing the lymphatic contrast used.
Keywords
Lymphedema; Microsurgery; Ergonomics; Digital hybrid visualization; Imaging, three-dimensional;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lakhiani C, Fisher SM, Janhofer DE, et al. Ergonomics in microsurgery. J Surg Oncol 2018;118:840-4.   DOI
2 Yu D, Sackllah M, Woolley C, et al. Quantitative posture analysis of 2D, 3D, and optical microscope visualization methods for microsurgery tasks. Work 2012;41 Suppl 1:1944-7.   DOI
3 Yu D, Green C, Kasten SJ, et al. Effect of alternative video displays on postures, perceived effort, and performance during microsurgery skill tasks. Appl Ergon 2016;53 Pt A:281-9.   DOI
4 Boyd B, Umansky J, Samson M, et al. Robotic harvest of internal mammary vessels in breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2006;22:261-6.   DOI
5 Tan YPA, Liverneaux P, Wong JKF. Current limitations of surgical robotics in reconstructive plastic microsurgery. Front Surg 2018;5:22.   DOI
6 Hong JPJ, Song S, Suh HSP. Supermicrosurgery: principles and applications. J Surg Oncol 2018;118:832-9.   DOI
7 Epstein S, Tran BN, Capone AC, et al. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among plastic surgeons: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018;34:553-62.   DOI
8 Willems JIP, Shin AM, Shin DM, et al. A comparison of robotically assisted microsurgery versus manual microsurgery in challenging situations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1317-24.   DOI