Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.01844

Computerized Sunnybrook facial grading scale (SBface) application for facial paralysis evaluation  

Jirawatnotai, Supasid (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Lerdsin Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University)
Jomkoh, Pojanan (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Lerdsin Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University)
Voravitvet, Tsz Yin (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Lerdsin Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University)
Tirakotai, Wuttipong (Department of Neurosurgery, Prasat Neurological Institute)
Somboonsap, Natthawut (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Buddhasothorn Hospital)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.48, no.3, 2021 , pp. 269-277 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background The Sunnybrook facial grading scale is a comprehensive scale for the evaluation of facial paralysis patients. Its results greatly depend on subjective input. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated Sunnybrook facial grading scale (SBface) to more objectively assess disfigurement due to facial paralysis. Methods An application compatible with iOS version 11.0 and up was developed. The software automatically detected facial features in standardized photographs and generated scores following the Sunnybrook facial grading scale. Photographic data from 30 unilateral facial paralysis patients were randomly sampled for validation. Intrarater reliability was tested by conducting two identical tests at a 2-week interval. Interrater reliability was tested between the software and three facial nerve clinicians. Results A beta version of the SBface application was tested. Intrarater reliability showed excellent congruence between the two tests. Moderate to strong positive correlations were found between the software and an otolaryngologist, including the total scores of the three individual software domains and composite scores. However, 74.4% (29/39) of the subdomain items showed low to zero correlation with the human raters (κ<0.2). The correlations between the human raters showed good congruence for most of the total and composite scores, with 10.3% (4/39) of the subdomain items failing to correspond (κ<0.2). Conclusions The SBface application is efficient and accurate for evaluating the degree of facial paralysis based on the Sunnybrook facial grading scale. However, correlations of the software-derived results with those of human raters are limited by the software algorithm and the raters' inconsistency.
Keywords
Facial paralysis; Scale; Mobile application; Photographic; Software validation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Burres S, Fisch U. The comparison of facial grading systems. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:755-8.   DOI
2 Banks CA, Jowett N, Azizzadeh B, et al. Worldwide testing of the eFACE facial nerve clinician-graded scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:491e-498e.   DOI
3 O'Reilly BF, Soraghan JJ, McGrenary S, et al. Objective method of assessing and presenting the House-Brackmann and regional grades of facial palsy by production of a facogram. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:486-91.   DOI
4 Baude M, Hutin E, Gracies JM. A bidimensional system of facial movement analysis conception and reliability in adults. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:812961.
5 Chee GH, Nedzelski JM. Facial nerve grading systems. Facial Plast Surg 2000;16:315-24.   DOI
6 Lee LN, Susarla SM, H Hohman M, et al. A comparison of facial nerve grading systems. Ann Plast Surg 2013;70:313-6.   DOI
7 Chong LSH, Eviston TJ, Low TH, et al. Validation of the clinician-graded electronic facial paralysis assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:159-67.   DOI
8 House JW. Facial nerve grading systems. Laryngoscope 1983;93:1056-69.   DOI
9 Neely JG, Cherian NG, Dickerson CB, et al. Sunnybrook facial grading system: reliability and criteria for grading. Laryngoscope 2010;120:1038-45.   DOI
10 Gaudin RA, Robinson M, Banks CA, et al. Emerging vs timetested methods of facial grading among patients with facial paralysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016;18:251-7.   DOI
11 Berg T, Jonsson L, Engstrom M. Agreement between the Sunnybrook, House-Brackmann, and Yanagihara facial nerve grading systems in Bell's palsy. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:1020-6.   DOI
12 Yanagihara N. Grading of facial palsy. In: Fisch U, editor. Facial nerve surgery. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery, Zurich, 1976. Amstelveen: Kugler Medical Publications; 1977. p. 533-5.
13 Ross BG, Fradet G, Nedzelski JM. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;114:380-6.   DOI
14 Banks CA, Bhama PK, Park J, et al. Clinician-graded electronic facial paralysis assessment: the eFACE. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136:223e-230e.   DOI
15 Fattah AY, Gurusinghe ADR, Gavilan J, et al. Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:569-79.   DOI
16 Mothes O, Modersohn L, Volk GF, et al. Automated objective and marker-free facial grading using photographs of patients with facial palsy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019;276:3335-43.   DOI
17 House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:146-7.   DOI
18 Kanerva M, Poussa T, Pitkaranta A. Sunnybrook and HouseBrackmann facial grading systems: intrarater repeatability and interrater agreement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:865-71.   DOI
19 Meier-Gallati V, Scriba H. Objective assessment of the reliability of the House-Brackmann and Fisch grading of synkinesis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:4217-23.   DOI