Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.00458

A novel subdermal anchoring technique for the effective treatment of congenital melanocytic nevus using de-epithelialized dermal flaps  

Han, Jin Woo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine)
Sun, Hook (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine)
Kim, Jin Woo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine)
Yun, Ji Young (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine)
Chung, Eui Han (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine)
Oh, Min Jun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.48, no.1, 2021 , pp. 55-60 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background In patients with congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN), single-stage removal of large lesions can be difficult because the high tension created by excising and repairing a large lesion may result in scar widening. Herein, we introduce a method to effectively excise lesions while minimizing scarring and compare its outcomes to those of existing surgical methods. Methods We compared patients who underwent surgery using the anchoring technique (n=42) or the conventional elliptical technique (n=36). One side of the lesion was removed via en bloc resection up to the superficial fascia. The other side of the lesion was removed via de-epithelialization. The de-epithelialized dermal flap was then fixed by suturing it to the superficial fascia on the opposite side. The length of the lesion's long axis and amount of scar widening were measured immediately after surgery and at 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. At 12 months, patients were assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Results The lesion locations included the face, arms, legs, back, and abdomen. The anchoring method resulted in shorter and smaller scars than the conventional method. There were no cases of postoperative hematoma or wound dehiscence. Significant differences in postoperative scar widening were found in the arm and leg areas (P<0.05). Conclusions The anchoring method introduced in this study can provide much better outcomes than the conventional method. The anchoring method is particularly useful for the removal of CMN around the joints or extremities, where the surgical site is subjected to high tension.
Keywords
Nevus; Scar; Superficial fascia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Arneja JS, Gosain AK. Giant congenital melanocytic nevi of the trunk and an algorithm for treatment. J Craniofac Surg 2005;16:886-93.   DOI
2 Michel JL, Chalencon F, Gentil-Perret A, et al. Congenital pigmented nevus: prognosis and therapeutic possibilities. Arch Pediatr 1999;6:211-7.   DOI
3 Hassanein AH, Rogers GF, Greene AK. Management of challenging congenital melanocytic nevi: outcomes study of serial excision. J Pediatr Surg 2015;50:613-6.   DOI
4 Hudson-Peacock MJ, Matthews JN, Lawrence CM. Relation between size of skin excision, wound, and specimen. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;32:1010-5.   DOI
5 Arneja JS, Gosain AK. Giant congenital melanocytic nevi. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:26e-40e.   DOI
6 Bayat A, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW. Skin scarring. BMJ 2003;326:88-92.   DOI
7 Mutti LA, Mascarenhas MR, Paiva JM, et al. Giant congenital melanocytic nevi: 40 years of experience with the serial excision technique. An Bras Dermatol 2017;92:256-9.   DOI