Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.00836

Social media impact in the Match: A survey of current trends in the United States  

Steele, Thomas N. (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine)
Galarza-Paez, Laura (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine)
Aguilo-Seara, Gabriela (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine)
David, Lisa R. (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.48, no.1, 2021 , pp. 107-113 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background Applicants to integrated plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) residency in the United States spend exorbitant amounts of time and money throughout the interview process. Outside of first-hand experience through a visiting rotation, applicants utilize various resources in learning about a program. Today's applicants are "Millennials," the demographic cohort raised during the information age and proficient with digital technology. The authors evaluated whether programs have a presence on social media, and whether applicants are following these accounts. Methods An online survey was sent to applicants to a single integrated plastic surgery program evaluating basic demographics, social media utilization, and sources of information accessed throughout the residency application process. A manual search of popular social media platforms (Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter) was performed in October 2019. Accounts affiliated with integrated PRS programs were identified and analyzed. Results Eighty-four of 222 applicants (37.8%) completed the survey. Ninety-six percent of applicants were within the Millennial demographic. Ninety-six percent of applicants had some form of social media presence, with Facebook (90%) and Instagram (87%) being the most popular platforms. Seventy-three percent of applicants reported following a PRS residency social media account. As of October 2019, 59 integrated residency programs (73%) have active Instagram accounts. Conclusions Applicants still rely on the program website when researching potential residencies, but social media is being rapidly adopted by programs. Program social media accounts should be used as a dynamic form of communication to better inform applicants of program strengths and weaknesses.
Keywords
Surgery, plastic; Social media; Internship and residency; Education, medical, graduate;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chandawarkar AA, Gould DJ, Stevens WG. Insta-grated plastic surgery residencies: the rise of social media use by trainees and responsible guidelines for use. Aesthet Surg J 2018;38:1145-52.   DOI
2 Sorice SC, Li AY, Gilstrap J, et al. Social media and the plastic surgery patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:1047-56.   DOI
3 Perrin A, Anderson M. Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018 [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; c2019 [cited 2021 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-socialmedia-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018/.
4 Janis JE, Hatef DA. Resident selection protocols in plastic surgery: a national survey of plastic surgery program directors. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122:1929-39.   DOI
5 Leskin P. Inside the rise of TikTok, the viral video-sharing app wildly popular with teens and loathed by the Trump administration [Internet]. New York, NY: Business Insider; c2020 [cited 2021 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.businessinsider.com/tiktok-app-online-website-video-sharing-2019-7.
6 Fan KL, Graziano F, Economides JM, et al. The public's preferences on plastic surgery social media engagement and professionalism: demystifying the impact of demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143:619-30.   DOI
7 Claiborne JR, Crantford JC, Swett KR, et al. The plastic surgery match: predicting success and improving the process. Ann Plast Surg 2013;70:698-703.   DOI
8 Molina Burbano F, Yao A, Burish N, et al. Solving congestion in the plastic surgery match: a game theory analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143:634-9.   DOI
9 Rohrich RJ. So, do you want to be facebook friends? How social media have changed plastic surgery and medicine forever. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:1021-6.   DOI
10 Boczar D, Sisti A, Restrepo DJ, et al. Meaningful use of social media for prospective plastic surgery residency candidates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143:670e-671e.
11 Weissbart SJ, Hall SJ, Fultz BR, et al. The urology match as a prisoner's dilemma: a game theory perspective. Urology 2013;82:791-7.   DOI
12 Chen VW, Hoang D, Garner W. Do websites provide what applicants need? Plastic surgery residency program websites versus applicant self-reported needs. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018;6:e1900.   DOI
13 Hashmi A, Policherla R, Campbell H, et al. How informative are the plastic surgery residency websites to prospective applicants? J Surg Educ 2017;74:74-8.   DOI
14 Montemurro P, Porcnik A, Heden P, et al. The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015;39:270-7.   DOI
15 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Match Data Archives [Internet]. Washington, DC: NRMP; c2019 [cited 2021 Jan 6]. Available from: http://www.nrmp.org/category/match-data/.
16 Weber L, Khosravani N. Connecting with the next generation: a medical student's perspective on social media use and plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;142:247e-248e.   DOI
17 Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, et al. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015;15:32.   DOI
18 Wood JS, David LR. Outcome analysis of factors impacting the plastic surgery match. Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:770-4.   DOI