1 |
Tuinder S, Dikmans R, Schipper RJ, et al. Anatomical evaluation of the internal mammary vessels based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65:1363-7.
DOI
|
2 |
Cakir B, Akan M, Akoz T. The management of size discrepancies in microvascular anastomoses. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2003;37:379-85.
|
3 |
Monsivais JJ. Microvascular grafts: effect of diameter discrepancy on patency rates. Microsurgery 1990;11:285-7.
DOI
|
4 |
Harris JR, Seikaly H, Calhoun K, et al. Effect of diameter of microvascular interposition vein grafts on vessel patency and free flap survival in the rat model. J Otolaryngol 1999; 28:152-7.
|
5 |
Sacks JM, Chang DW. Rib-sparing internal mammary vessel harvest for microvascular breast reconstruction in 100 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1403-7.
DOI
|
6 |
Tan O, Yuce I, Aydin OE, et al. A radioanatomic study of the internal mammary artery and its perforators using multidetector computed tomography angiography. Microsurgery 2014;34:277-82.
DOI
|
7 |
Sasaki Y, Madada-Nyakauru RN, Samaras S, et al. The ideal intercostal space for internal mammary vessel exposure during total rib-sparing microvascular breast reconstruction: a critical evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019;72: 1000-6.
DOI
|
8 |
Vanschoonbeek A, Fabre G, Nanhekhan L, et al. Outcome after urgent microvascular revision of free DIEP, SIEA and SGAP flaps for autologous breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016;69:1598-608.
DOI
|
9 |
Broer PN, Weichman KE, Tanna N, et al. Venous coupler size in autologous breast reconstruction: does it matter? Microsurgery 2013;33:514-8.
DOI
|
10 |
Khoo A, Rosich-Medina A, Woodham A, et al. The relationship between the intercostal distance, patient height and outcome in microsurgical breast reconstruction using the second interspace rib-sparing internal mammary vessel exposure. Microsurgery 2014;34:448-53.
DOI
|
11 |
Kim H, Lim SY, Pyon JK, et al. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography of both donor and recipient sites for microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:11e-20e.
DOI
|
12 |
Suzuki S, Furui S, Kaminaga T. Accuracy of automated CT angiography measurement of vascular diameter in phantoms: effect of size of display field of view, density of contrast medium, and wall thickness. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1940-4.
DOI
|
13 |
Woo KJ, Park JW, Mun GH. The lateral calcaneal artery as an alternative recipient vessel option for heel and lateral foot reconstruction. Microsurgery 2018;38:164-71.
DOI
|
14 |
Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:7S-13S.
DOI
|
15 |
Vollbach FH, Heitmann CD, Fansa H. An appraisal of internal mammary artery perforators as recipient vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction: an analysis of 515 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;4:e1144.
DOI
|
16 |
Haywood RM, Raurell A, Perks AG, et al. Autologous free tissue breast reconstruction using the internal mammary perforators as recipient vessels. Br J Plast Surg 2003;56:689-91.
DOI
|
17 |
Majumder S, Batchelor AG. Internal mammary vessels as recipients for free TRAM breast reconstruction: aesthetic and functional considerations. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:286-9.
DOI
|
18 |
Follmar KE, Prucz RB, Manahan MA, et al. Internal mammary intercostal perforators instead of the true internal mammary vessels as the recipient vessels for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:34-40.
|
19 |
Arnez ZM, Valdatta L, Tyler MP, et al. Anatomy of the internal mammary veins and their use in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1995;48:540-5.
DOI
|
20 |
Clark CP 3rd, Rohrich RJ, Copit S, et al. An anatomic study of the internal mammary veins: clinical implications for free-tissue-transfer breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:400-4.
DOI
|