Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00318

Aesthetic outcomes after surgical repair of pectus excavatum in females: Differences between patients and professional evaluators  

Wachter, Tanja (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck)
Frari, Barbara Del (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck)
Edlinger, Michael (Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck)
Morandi, Evi Maria (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck)
Mayerl, Christina (Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Innsbruck)
Verstappen, Ralph (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck)
Celep, Emre (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck)
Djedovic, Gabriel (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck)
Kinzl, Johann (Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic, Medical University of Innsbruck)
Schwabegger, Anton Herbert (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck)
Wolfram, Dolores (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.47, no.2, 2020 , pp. 126-134 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background Pectus excavatum is less common in females than in males, and it often aggravates a coexistent breast asymmetry. We conducted a study comparing female patients' versus medical professionals' evaluation of pectus excavatum repair to assess differences in aesthetic outcome ratings. Moreover, we evaluated the influence of surgical correction on patients' self-perception. Methods Of 30 female patients who were initially screened, 18 patients (mean age, 20 years) who underwent bar removal after surgical correction of pectus excavatum deformity participated in the survey (60%). They completed a questionnaire rating their appearance before and after surgery and responded to a psychological questionnaire about the changes that they had experienced. The mean interval between pectus bar removal and evaluation was 28 months. Standardized preoperative and postoperative patient photographs were evaluated using the same questionnaire by a panel of medical professionals and students (n=24) and the results were compared. Results Patients rated their preoperative deformity as more severe than the other evaluators, revealing the significant impact of the deformity on patients' self-perception. Postoperatively, patient and professional evaluations were much better than before and were very similar. The psychological evaluation showed a clear improvement in well-being. The ratings of the medical professionals were not influenced by their degree of medical education. Conclusions Surgical correction of pectus excavatum in female patients positively influences body perception and psychological well-being. It should therefore not be considered as a merely aesthetic correction, but as an important procedure to restore a patient's self-perception.
Keywords
Funnel chest; Thoracic surgical procedures; Female; Self concept;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kotzot D, Schwabegger AH. Etiology of chest wall deformities: a genetic review for the treating physician. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:2004-11.   DOI
2 Cartoski MJ, Nuss D, Goretsky MJ, et al. Classification of the dysmorphology of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:1573-81.   DOI
3 Schwabegger AH, Del Frari B, Pierer G. Aesthetic improvement of the female breast in funnel chest deformity by surgical repair of the thoracic wall: indication or lifestyle surgery? Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:245e-253e.   DOI
4 Einsiedel E, Clausner A. Funnel chest: psychological and psychosomatic aspects in children, youngsters, and young adults. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1999;40:733-6.
5 Roberts J, Hayashi A, Anderson JO, et al. Quality of life of patients who have undergone the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: preliminary findings. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38: 779-83.   DOI
6 Dohrmann P, Lotz W, Mengel W. Psychological and cosmetic indications for the surgery of funnel chest. Z Kinderchir 1987;42:286-90.
7 Del Frari B, Schwabegger AH. Clinical results and patient satisfaction after pectus excavatum repair using the MIRPE and MOVARPE technique in adults: 10-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:1591-602.   DOI
8 Wachter T, Edlinger M, Foerg C, et al. Differences between patients and medical professionals in the evaluation of aesthetic outcome following breast reconstruction with implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67:1111-7.   DOI
9 Beesley H, Ullmer H, Holcombe C, et al. How patients evaluate breast reconstruction after mastectomy, and why their evaluation often differs from that of their clinicians. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65:1064-71.   DOI
10 Krasopoulos G, Dusmet M, Ladas G, et al. Nuss procedure improves the quality of life in young male adults with pectus excavatum deformity. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:1-5.   DOI
11 Kelly RE Jr, Cash TF, Shamberger RC, et al. Surgical repair of pectus excavatum markedly improves body image and perceived ability for physical activity: multicenter study. Pediatrics 2008;122:1218-22.   DOI
12 Zielke M, Kopf-Mehnert C. Veranderungsfragebogen des Erlebens und Verhaltens. Gottingen: Beltz Test GmbH; 1978.
13 Jacobsen EB, Thastum M, Jeppesen JH, et al. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents undergoing surgery for pectus excavatum. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2010;20:85-91.   DOI
14 Kim HK, Shim JH, Choi KS, et al. The quality of life after bar removal in patients after the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. World J Surg 2011;35:1656-61.   DOI
15 Steinmann C, Krille S, Mueller A, et al. Pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum patients suffer from lower quality of life and impaired body image: a control group comparison of psychological characteristics prior to surgical correction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:1138-45.
16 Nuss D, Kelly RE Jr, Croitoru DP, et al. A 10-year review of a minimally invasive technique for the correction of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:545-52.   DOI
17 Lawson ML, Mellins RB, Tabangin M, et al. Impact of pectus excavatum on pulmonary function before and after repair with the Nuss procedure. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:174-80.   DOI
18 Lawson ML, Cash TF, Akers R, et al. A pilot study of the impact of surgical repair on disease-specific quality of life among patients with pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38:916-8.   DOI
19 Metzelder ML, Kuebler JF, Leonhardt J, et al. Self and parental assessment after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: lasting satisfaction after bar removal. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1844-9.   DOI
20 Sacco Casamassima MG, Gause C, Goldstein SD, et al. Patient satisfaction after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum in adults: long-term results of Nuss procedure in adults. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:1338-45.   DOI
21 Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med 1994;38:509-16.   DOI
22 Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Yarnold JR, et al. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 1. Comparison of patients' ratings, observers' ratings, and objective assessments. Radiother Oncol 1992;25:153-9.   DOI
23 Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:1351-9.   DOI
24 Lebow JL. Similarities and differences between mental health and health care evaluation studies assessing consumer satisfaction. Eval Program Plann 1983;6:237-45.   DOI
25 Linder-Pelz S. Social psychological determinants of patient satisfaction: a test of five hypothesis. Soc Sci Med 1982;16: 583-9.   DOI