Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00472

The round-the-clock technique for correction of gynecomastia  

Tarallo, Mauro (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sapienza University)
Taranto, Giuseppe Di (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sapienza University)
Fallico, Nefer (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sapienza University)
Ribuffo, Diego (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sapienza University)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.46, no.3, 2019 , pp. 221-227 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background Gynecomastia is a common condition that can cause severe emotional and physical distress in both young and older men. Patients in whom symptomatic recalcitrant gynecomastia persists for a long time are potential candidates for surgery. Methods From January 2014 to January 2016, 15 patients underwent correction of gynecomastia through a single 3-mm incision at our institution. Only patients with true gynecomastia underwent surgery with this new technique. Through the small incision, sharp dissection was performed in a clockwise and counterclockwise direction describing two half-circles. Health-related quality of life and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated using a modified version of the Breast Evaluation Questionnaire (BEQ). Results The patients' average age was 23.5 years (range, 18-28 years), and their average body mass index was $23.2kg/m^2$ (range, $19.2-25.3kg/m^2$). One case was unilateral and 14 cases were bilateral. The weight of glandular tissue resected from each breast ranged from 80 to 170 g. No excess skin was excised. Bleeding was minimal. The mean operating time was 25 minutes (range, 21-40 minutes). No complications were recorded. All lesions were histologically benign. The patients' average score was 3.5 (on a 5-point Likert scale) in all domains of the BEQ for themselves and their partners. Conclusions In this study, we demonstrated the safety and reliability of a new technique that allows mastectomy through an imperceptible 3-mm incision. We obtained high patient satisfaction scores using our surgical technique, and patients reported considerable improvement in their social, physical, and psychological well-being after surgery.
Keywords
Gynecomastia; Liposuction; Outcomes assessment; Health-related quality of life; Mastectomy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Waltho D, Hatchell A, Thoma A. Gynecomastia classification for surgical management: a systematic review and novel classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:638e-648e.   DOI
2 Mentz HA, Ruiz-Razura A, Newall G, et al. Correction of gynecomastia through a single puncture incision. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007;31:244-9.   DOI
3 Cigna E, Tarallo M, Fino P, et al. Surgical correction of gynecomastia in thin patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011;35:439-45.   DOI
4 Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S. Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973;51:48-52.   DOI
5 Wiesman IM, Lehman JA Jr, Parker MG, et al. Gynecomastia: an outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg 2004;53:97-101.   DOI
6 Telegrafo M, Introna T, Coi L, et al. Breast US as primary imaging modality for diagnosing gynecomastia. G Chir 2016;37:118-22.
7 He Q, Zheng L, Zhuang D, et al. Surgical treatment of gynecomastia by vacuum-assisted biopsy device. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011;21:431-4.   DOI
8 Lee BH, Kwon YJ, Park JW, et al. Gynecomastia surgery is associated with improved nipple location in young Korean patients. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:748-52.   DOI
9 Kasielska-Trojan A, Antoszewski B. Gynecomastia surgery-impact on life quality: a prospective case-control study. Ann Plast Surg 2017;78:264-8.   DOI
10 Munoz Carrasco R, Alvarez Benito M, Munoz Gomariz E, et al. Mammography and ultrasound in the evaluation of male breast disease. Eur Radiol 2010;20:2797-805.   DOI
11 Tu LC, Tung KY, Chen HC, et al. Eccentric mastectomy and zigzag periareolar incision for gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:549-54.   DOI
12 Ridha H, Colville RJ, Vesely MJ. How happy are patients with their gynaecomastia reduction surgery? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:1473-8.   DOI
13 van Deventer PV. The blood supply to the nipple-areola complex of the human mammary gland. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004;28:393-8.   DOI
14 Fagerlund A, Lewin R, Rufolo G, et al. Gynecomastia: a systematic review. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2015;49:311-8.   DOI
15 Inserra I, Martelli C, Cipollina M, et al. Lipoaspirate fluid proteome: a preliminary investigation by LC-MS top-down/bottom-up integrated platform of a high potential biofluid in regenerative medicine. Electrophoresis 2016;37: 1015-26.   DOI
16 Anderson RC, Cunningham B, Tafesse E, et al. Validation of the Breast Evaluation Questionnaire for use with breast surgery patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:597-602.   DOI
17 Nuttall FQ. Gynecomastia. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:961-2.   DOI
18 Handschin AE, Bietry D, Husler R, et al. Surgical management of gynecomastia: a 10-year analysis. World J Surg 2008;32:38-44.   DOI
19 Hammond DC, Arnold JF, Simon AM, et al. Combined use of ultrasonic liposuction with the pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:891-5.   DOI
20 Maruccia M, Di Taranto G, Onesti MG. One-stage muscle-sparing breast reconstruction in elderly patients: a new tool for retaining excellent quality of life. Breast J 2018;24:180-3.   DOI