Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study |
Moon, Kyung-Chul
(Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine)
Lee, Jae-Min (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) Baek, Si-Ook (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) Jang, Seo-Yoon (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) Yoon, Eul-Sik (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) Lee, Byung-Il (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) Park, Seung-Ha (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) |
1 | Chang DW, Kim S. Breast reconstruction and lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:19-23. DOI |
2 | Temple CL, Strom EA, Youssef A, et al. Choice of recipient vessels in delayed TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:105-13. DOI |
3 | Loiselle F, Schrag C, Magi E, et al. Occult malignancy rate associated with thoracodorsal vessel dissection for free flap breast reconstruction. J Surg Oncol 2008;98:94-6. DOI |
4 | Halim AS, Alwi AA. Internal mammary perforators as recipient vessels for deep inferior epigastric perforator and muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap breast reconstruction in an Asian population. Ann Plast Surg 2014;73:170-3. DOI |
5 | Saint-Cyr M, Youssef A, Bae HW, et al. Changing trends in recipient vessel selection for microvascular autologous breast reconstruction: an analysis of 1483 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:1993-2000. DOI |
6 | Moran SL, Nava G, Behnam AB, et al. An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective study of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111:1876-82. DOI |
7 | Haywood RM, Raurell A, Perks AG, et al. Autologous free tissue breast reconstruction using the internal mammary perforators as recipient vessels. Br J Plast Surg 2003;56:689-91. DOI |
8 | Follmar KE, Prucz RB, Manahan MA, et al. Internal mammary intercostal perforators instead of the true internal mammary vessels as the recipient vessels for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:34-40. |
9 | Majumder S, Batchelor AG. Internal mammary vessels as recipients for free TRAM breast reconstruction: aesthetic and functional considerations. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:286-9. DOI |
10 | Dupin CL, Allen RJ, Glass CA, et al. The internal mammary artery and vein as a recipient site for free-flap breast reconstruction: a report of 110 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:685-9. DOI |
11 | Hefel L, Schwabegger A, Ninkovic M, et al. Internal mammary vessels: anatomical and clinical considerations. Br J Plast Surg 1995;48:527-32. DOI |
12 | Santanelli Di Pompeo F, Longo B, Sorotos M, et al. The axillary versus internal mammary recipient vessel sites for breast reconstruction with diep flaps: a retrospective study of 256 consecutive cases. Microsurgery 2015;35:34-8. DOI |
13 | Samargandi OA, Winter J, Corkum JP, et al. Comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipients for microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2017;37: 937-46. DOI |
14 | Banwell M, Trotter D, Ramakrishnan V. The thoracodorsal artery and vein as recipient vessels for microsurgical breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68:542-3. DOI |
15 | Kropf N, Macadam SA, McCarthy C, et al. Influence of the recipient vessel on fat necrosis after breast reconstruction with a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2010;44:96-101. DOI |
16 | Lhuaire M, Hivelin M, Drame M, et al. Determining the best recipient vessel site for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: an anatomical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017;70:781-91. DOI |
17 | Rosson GD, Holton LH, Silverman RP, et al. Internal mammary perforators: a cadaver study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2005;21:239-42. DOI |
18 | Santanelli F, Longo B, Cagli B, et al. Predictive and protective factors for partial necrosis in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: does nulliparity bias flap viability? Ann Plast Surg 2015;74:47-51. DOI |
19 | Cody 3rd HS. Sentinal lymph node mapping in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 1999;6:13-22. DOI |
20 | McLaughlin SA, Wright MJ, Morris KT, et al. Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5213-9. DOI |
21 | Neligan P, Warren RJ, Van Beek A. Plastic surgery. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. |
22 | Nahabedian M. The internal mammary artery and vein as recipient vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68:537-8. DOI |
23 | Baek IS, You JP, Rhee SM, et al. A clinical anatomic study of internal mammary perforators as recipient vessels for breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40:761-5. DOI |
24 | Yang SJ, Eom JS, Lee TJ, et al. Recipient vessel selection in immediate breast reconstruction with free abdominal tissue transfer after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39:216-21. DOI |
25 | Schmidt M, Aszmann OC, Beck H, et al. The anatomic basis of the internal mammary artery perforator flap: a cadaver study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:191-6. DOI |
![]() |