Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00430

Accessory auricle: Classification according to location, protrusion pattern and body shape  

Hwang, Jungil (Department of Plastic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine)
Cho, Jaeyoung (Department of Plastic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine)
Burm, Jin Sik (Department of Plastic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.45, no.5, 2018 , pp. 411-417 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background Accessory auricles (AAs) are common congenital anomalies. We present a new classification according to location and shape, and propose a system for coding the classifications. Methods This study was conducted by reviewing the records of 502 patients who underwent surgery for AA. AAs were classified into three anatomical types: intraauricular, preauricular, and buccal. Intraauricular AAs were divided into three subtypes: intracrural, intratragal, and intralobal. Preauricular AAs were divided into five subtypes: precrural, superior pretragal, middle pretragal, inferior pretragal, and prelobal. Buccal AAs were divided into two subtypes: anterior buccal and posterior buccal. AAs were also classified according to their protrusion pattern above the surrounding surface: pedunculated, sessile, areolar, remnant, and depressed. Pedunculated and sessile AAs were subclassified as spherical, ovoid, lobed, and nodular, according to their body shape. Cartilage root presence and family history of AA were reviewed. A coding system for these classifications was also proposed. Results The total number of AAs in the 502 patients was 1,003. Among the locations, the superior pretragal subtype (27.6%) was the most common. Among the protrusion patterns and shapes, pedunculated ovoid AAs were the most common in the preauricular (27.8%) and buccal areas (28.0%), and sessile lobed AAs were the most common in the intraauricular area (48.7%). The proportion of AAs with a cartilage root was 78.4%, and 11% of patients had a family history. The most common type of preauricular AA was the superior pretragal pedunculated ovoid AA (13.2%) with a cartilage root. Conclusions This new system will serve as a guideline for classifying and coding AAs.
Keywords
Classification; Ear abnormalities; Embryology; Accessory auricle; Accessory tragus;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kagurasho M, Yamada S, Uwabe C, et al. Movement of the external ear in human embryo. Head Face Med 2012;8:2.   DOI
2 Porter CJ, Tan ST. Congenital auricular anomalies: topographic anatomy, embryology, classification, and treatment strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:1701-12.   DOI
3 Brownstein MH, Wanger N, Helwig EB. Accessory tragi. Arch Dermatol 1971;104:625-31.   DOI
4 Bahrani B, Khachemoune A. Review of accessory tragus with highlights of its associated syndromes. Int J Dermatol 2014;53:1442-6.   DOI
5 Kugelman A, Hadad B, Ben-David J, et al. Preauricular tags and pits in the newborn: the role of hearing tests. Acta Paediatr 1997;86:170-2.
6 Dancel R, Price D, Kaufmann L. Evaluation of newborns with preauricular skin lesions. Am Fam Physician 2012;85: 993-8.
7 Beder LB, Kemaloglu YK, Maral I, et al. A study on the prevalence of accessory auricle anomaly in Turkey. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002;63:25-7.   DOI
8 Moon IY, Oh KS. Surgical correction of an accessory auricle, polyotia. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:427-9.   DOI
9 Park C. Lower auricular malformations: their representation, correction, and embryologic correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:29-40.   DOI