1 |
Eccles DM, Gareth Evans D. Management of the contralateral breast in patients with hereditary breast cancer. Breast 2000;9:301-5.
DOI
|
2 |
Raabe NK, Sauer T, Erichsen A, et al. Breast cancer in the contralateral breast: incidence and histopathology after unilateral radical treatment of the first breast cancer. Oncol Rep 1999;6:1001-7.
|
3 |
Healey EA, Cook EF, Orav EJ, et al. Contralateral breast cancer: clinical characteristics and impact on prognosis. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:1545-52.
DOI
|
4 |
Claus EB, Stowe M, Carter D, et al. The risk of a contralateral breast cancer among women diagnosed with ductal and lobular breast carcinoma in situ: data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Breast 2003;12:451-6.
DOI
|
5 |
Rosen PP, Groshen S, Kinne DW, et al. Contralateral breast carcinoma: an assessment of risk and prognosis in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) patients with 20-year follow-up. Surgery 1989;106:904-10.
|
6 |
Mendelson EB. Evaluation of the postoperative breast. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:107-38.
|
7 |
Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P, et al. Mammographic measurements before and after augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:1126-30.
DOI
|
8 |
Handel N, Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, et al. Factors affecting mammographic visualization of the breast after augmentation mammaplasty. JAMA 1992;268:1913-7.
DOI
|
9 |
Nahabedian MY. Symmetrical breast reconstruction: analysis of secondary procedures after reconstruction with implants and autologous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115: 257-60.
|
10 |
Nahabedian MY. Managing the opposite breast: contralateral symmetry procedures. Cancer J 2008;14:258-63.
DOI
|
11 |
Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J 3rd, et al. Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:89-97.
DOI
|
12 |
Smith ML, Clarke-Pearson EM, Vornovitsky M, et al. The efficacy of simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral balancing procedures in reducing the need for second stage operations. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:535-41.
DOI
|
13 |
Giacalone PL, Bricout N, Dantas MJ, et al. Achieving symmetry in unilateral breast reconstruction: 17 years experience with 683 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002;26:299-302.
DOI
|
14 |
Lee WY, Kim MJ, Lew DH, et al. Three-dimensional surface imaging is an effective tool for measuring breast volume: a validation study. Arch Plast Surg 2016;43:430-7.
DOI
|
15 |
Nahabedian MY, Galdino G. Symmetrical breast reconstruction: is there a role for three-dimensional digital photography? Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:1582-90.
DOI
|
16 |
Tepper OM, Small K, Rudolph L, et al. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am J Surg 2006;192:548-51.
DOI
|
17 |
Losken A, Fishman I, Denson DD, et al. An objective evaluation of breast symmetry and shape differences using 3-dimensional images. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:571-5.
DOI
|
18 |
Singletary SE, Kroll SS. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Adv Surg 1996;30:39-52.
|
19 |
Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, et al. Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:421-5.
DOI
|