Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.4.319

Reconstruction of Large Facial Defects via Excision of Skin Cancer Using Two or More Regional Flaps  

Lee, Dong Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine)
Bae, Yong Chan (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine)
Nam, Su Bong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine)
Bae, Seong Hwan (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine)
Choi, June Seok (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.44, no.4, 2017 , pp. 319-323 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background Free-flap surgery and skin grafting can be used to reconstruct large facial defects that may result after skin cancer removal by Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). However, these two methods may produce low postsurgical patient satisfaction with aesthetics, and free-flap surgery may produce an undue burden for the majority of skin cancer patients, who are of advanced age. Hence, the authors examined outcomes of large facial defect reconstruction using multiple flaps. Methods Among patients undergoing MMS for skin cancer at Pusan National University Hospital between January 2013 and December 2015, we evaluated 7 patients (2 males, 5 females; average age, 73.14 years) treated for large facial defects from basal cell carcinoma. Based on operative and follow-up records, we investigated the number and type of flaps used, postsurgical complications, and patients' post-surgical satisfaction. Results Two and 3 types of flaps were used for 5 and 2 patients, respectively. Most frequently used were nasolabial flaps (7 times in 6 patients) and forehead flaps (once in each of 4 patients). The average follow-up period was 14 months, with no complications-including necrosis, hematoma, or wound dehiscence-observed. Post-surgical satisfaction averaged 4.4 out of a maximum of 5 points. Conclusions Reconstruction using two or more flaps for large facial defects after skin cancer removal using MMS produced satisfactory outcomes while preventing aesthetic problems. Practitioners should consider using multiple flaps when choosing a reconstruction method for large facial defects following skin cancer removal.
Keywords
Mohs surgery; Multiple flaps; Large defects;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Deluca J, Tappeiner L, Pichler M, et al. Using the Peng flap for a wide dorsal nasal defect. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2014; 12:1060-2.
2 Lindsay KJ, Morton JD. Flap or graft: The best of both in nasal ala reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68:1352-7.   DOI
3 Stigall LE, Bramlette TB, Zitelli JA, et al. The paramidline forehead flap: a clinical and microanatomic study. Dermatol Surg 2016;42:764-71.   DOI
4 Blazquez-Sanchez N, Fernandez-Canedo I, Repiso-Jimenez JB, et al. Usefulness of the paramedian forehead flap in nasal reconstructive surgery: a retrospective series of 41 patients. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2016;107:133-41.   DOI
5 Camuzard O, Foissac R, Georgiou C, et al. Facial artery perforator flap for reconstruction of perinasal defects: an anatomical study and clinical application. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015;43:2057-65.   DOI
6 Wollina U. Reconstruction of large facial defects after delayed Mohs surgery for skin cancer. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat 2015;23:265-9.
7 Thomas CL, Lam A, Lam J, et al. Factors affecting choice of repair in Mohs micrographic surgery for non-melanoma skin cancer of the head. Australas J Dermatol 2016 Feb 24 [Epub]. https:// doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12453.   DOI
8 Suarez JE, Sadigh PL, Jeng SF. Aesthetic subunit reconstruction facilitated with v-y island advancement flaps on the face: a case report. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014;2:e148.   DOI