Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.2.166

A New Technique for Conchal Cartilage Harvest  

Kim, Joon Young (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eulji University Hospital)
Yang, Ho Jik (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eulji University Hospital)
Jeong, Ji Won (Doctorsmi Aesthetic Plastic Surgical Clinic)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.44, no.2, 2017 , pp. 166-169 More about this Journal
Abstract
The goal of auricular cartilage harvest is to obtain a sufficient amount for reconstruction and to minimize the change in ear shape. The cartilage can be harvested by a posterior or anterior approach, and each method has advantages and disadvantages. The posterior approach presents the advantage of scar concealment, but there are limits to the amount of cymba cartilage that may be harvested. In contrast, the anterior approach may cause a noticeable scar. However, as cartilage is collected, the anterior approach provides a view that facilitates the preservation ear structure. In addition, it is possible to obtain a greater amount of cartilage. From January 2014 to December 2015, we harvested auricular cartilage graft material in 17 patients. To prevent the development of trapdoor scars or linear scar contracture, short incisions were made on the superior border of the cymba and cavum. Two small and narrow incisions were made, resulting in suboptimal exposure of the surgical site, which heightens the potential for damaging the cartilage when using existing tools. To minimize this, the authors used a newly invented ball-type elevator. All patients recovered without complications after surgery and reported satisfaction with the shape of the ear.
Keywords
Ear cartilage; Tissue and organ harvesting; Autograft;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Moshaver A, Gantous A. The use of autogenous costal cartilage graft in septorhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;137:862-7.   DOI
2 Thomson HG, Kim TY, Ein SH. Residual problems in chest donor sites after microtia reconstruction: a long-term study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;95:961-8.   DOI
3 Han K, Kim J, Son D, et al. How to harvest the maximal amount of conchal cartilage grafts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:1465-71.   DOI
4 Rohrich RJ, Ahmad J. Plastic surgery. In: Neligan P, editor. Plastic surgery. London: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. p.395-6.
5 Erol OO. New modification in otoplasty: anterior approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:193-202.   DOI
6 Endo T, Nakayama Y, Ito Y. Augmentation rhinoplasty: observations on 1200 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:54-9.   DOI
7 Grobbelaar AO, Matti BA, Nicolle FV. Donor site morbidity post-conchal cartilage grafting. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1997; 21:90-2.   DOI
8 Lee M, Callahan S, Cochran CS. Auricular cartilage: harvest technique and versatility in rhinoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol 2011;32:547-52.   DOI
9 Cochran CS, DeFatta RJ. Tragal cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: a viable alternative in the graft-depleted patient. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:166-9.   DOI
10 Boccieri A, Marano A. The conchal cartilage graft in nasal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:188-94.   DOI
11 Steiger JD, Bloom J, Becker DG. Auricular cartilage grafts. Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg 2008;19:267-72.   DOI
12 Adams WP Jr, Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, et al. The rate of warping in irradiated and nonirradiated homograft rib cartilage: a controlled comparison and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:265-70.   DOI
13 Romo T 3rd, Kwak ES, Sclafani AP. Revision rhinoplasty using porous high-density polyethylene implants to reestablish ethnic identity. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006;30:679-84.   DOI
14 Gunter JP, Landecker A, Cochran CS. Frequently used grafts in rhinoplasty: nomenclature and analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:14e-29e.   DOI
15 Sajjadian A, Rubinstein R, Naghshineh N. Current status of grafts and implants in rhinoplasty: part I. Autologous grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:40e-49e.   DOI