Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.562

Through Knee Amputation: Technique Modifications and Surgical Outcomes  

Albino, Frank P. (Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital)
Seidel, Rachel (Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital)
Brown, Benjamin J. (Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital)
Crone, Charles G. (Nascott/Hanger Clinic)
Attinger, Christopher E. (Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.41, no.5, 2014 , pp. 562-570 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background Knee disarticulations (KD) are most commonly employed following trauma or tumor resection but represent less than 2% of all lower extremity amputations performed in the United States annually. KDs provide enhanced proprioception, a long lever arm, preservation of adductor muscle insertion, decreased metabolic cost of ambulation, and an end weight-bearing stump. The role for KDs in the setting of arterial insufficiency or overwhelming infection is less clear. The purpose of this study is to describe technique modifications and report surgical outcomes following KDs at a high-volume Limb Salvage Center. Methods A retrospective study of medical records for all patients who underwent a through-knee amputation performed by the senior author (C.E.A.) between 2004 and 2012 was completed. Medical records were reviewed to collect demographic, operative, and postoperative information for each of the patients identified. Results Between 2004 and 2012, 46 through-knee amputations for 41 patients were performed. The mean patient age was 68 and indications for surgery included infection (56%), arterial thrombosis (35%), and trauma (9%). Postoperative complications included superficial cellulitis (13%), soft tissue infection (4%), and flap ischemia (4%) necessitating one case of surgical debridement (4%) and four transfemoral amputations (9%). 9 (22%) patients went on to ambulate. Postoperative ambulation was greatest in the traumatic cohort and for patients less than 50 years of age, P<0.05. Alternatively, diabetes mellitus and infection reduced the likelihood of postoperative ambulation, P<0.01. Conclusions Knee disarticulations are a safe and effective alternative to other lower extremity amputations when clinically feasible. For patient unlikely to ambulate, a through-knee amputation maximizes ease of transfers, promotes mobility by providing a counterbalance, and eliminates the potential for knee flexion contracture with subsequent skin breakdown.
Keywords
Amputation; Disarticulation; Extremity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Behr J, Friedly J, Molton I, et al. Pain and pain-related interference in adults with lower-limb amputation: comparison of knee-disarticulation, transtibial, and transfemoral surgical sites. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009;46:963-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Kulkarni J, Pande S, Morris J. Survival rates in dysvascular lower limb amputees. Int J Surg 2006;4:217-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Sansam K, Neumann V, O'Connor R, et al. Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:593-603.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Krajbich JI. Lower-limb deficiencies and amputations in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1998;6:358-67.   DOI
5 Ten Duis K, Bosmans JC, Voesten HG, et al. Knee disarticulation: survival, wound healing and ambulation. A historic cohort study. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009;33:52-60.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Pinzur MS, Gold J, Schwartz D, et al. Energy demands for walking in dysvascular amputees as related to the level of amputation. Orthopedics 1992;15:1033-6.
7 Gailey RS, Wenger MA, Raya M, et al. Energy expenditure of trans-tibial amputees during ambulation at self-selected pace. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994;18:84-91.
8 Morse BC, Cull DL, Kalbaugh C, et al. Through-knee amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a review of 50 cases. J Vasc Surg 2008;48:638-43.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Attinger CE, Brown BJ. Amputation and ambulation in diabetic patients: function is the goal. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2012;28 Suppl 1:93-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Evans KK, Attinger CE, Al-Attar A, et al. The importance of limb preservation in the diabetic population. J Diabetes Complications 2011;25:227-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Taylor SM, Kalbaugh CA, Blackhurst DW, et al. Preoperative clinical factors predict postoperative functional outcomes after major lower limb amputation: an analysis of 553 consecutive patients. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:227-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Fisher DF Jr, Clagett GP, Fry RE, et al. One-stage versus two-stage amputation for wet gangrene of the lower extremity: a randomized study. J Vasc Surg 1988;8:428-33.   DOI
13 Nellis N, Van De Water JM. Through-the-knee amputation: an improved technique. Am Surg 2002;68:466-9.
14 Borkosky SL, Roukis TS. Incidence of re-amputation following partial first ray amputation associated with diabetes mellitus and peripheral sensory neuropathy: a systematic review. Diabet Foot Ankle 2012;3:12169.   DOI
15 Raichle KA, Hanley MA, Molton I, et al. Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:961-72.   DOI   ScienceOn