| 1 |
Kachewar SG, Sankaye SB. Reviewer index: a new proposal of rewarding the reviewer. Mens Sana Monogr 2013;11:274-84.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 2 |
Steinhauser G, Adlassnig W, Risch JA, et al. Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science. Theor Med Bioeth 2012;33:359-76.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 3 |
Kravitz RL, Franks P, Feldman MD, et al. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care? PLoS One 2010;5:e10072.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 4 |
Merton RK. The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 1968;159:56-63.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 5 |
Epstude K, Mussweiler T. What you feel is how you compare: how comparisons influence the social induction of affect. Emotion 2009;9:1-14.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 6 |
Hwang K. The need for a reviewer to play Devil's advocate. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40:171-2.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
webmaster
