Tabbed Tissue Expanders Improve Breast Symmetry Scores in Breast Reconstruction |
Khavanin, Nima
(Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine)
Gust, Madeleine J. (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine) Grant, David W. (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine) Nguyen, Khang T. (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine) Kim, John Y.S. (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine) |
1 | Buck DW 2nd, Heyer K, DiBardino D, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction with the use of crescentric tissue expansion: a functional cosmetic analysis of 40 consecutive patients. Aesthet Surg J 2010;30:194-200. DOI ScienceOn |
2 | McGeorge DD, Mahdi S, Tsekouras A. Breast reconstruction with anatomical expanders and implants: our early experience. Br J Plast Surg 1996;49:352-7. DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Gui GP, Tan SM, Faliakou EC, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:125-38. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Mahdi S, Jones T, Nicklin S, et al. Expandable anatomical implants in breast reconstructions: a prospective study. Br J Plast Surg 1998;51:425-30. DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Maxwell GP, Falcone PA. Eighty-four consecutive breast reconstructions using a textured silicone tissue expander. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:1022-34. DOI |
6 | FDA. Natrelle 410 highly cohesive anatomically shaped silicone-filled breast implant-P040046 [Internet]. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Adimistration; c2013 [cited 2013 May 26]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/Recently-ApprovedDevices/ucm343639.htm. |
7 | Beahm EK, Walton RL. Revision in autologous breast reconstruction: principles and approach. Clin Plast Surg 2007;34:139-62. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Stevenson TR, Goldstein JA. TRAM flap breast reconstruction and contralateral reduction or mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92:228-33. DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Szychta P, Butterworth M, Dixon M, et al. Breast reconstruction with the denervated latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. Breast 2013;22:667-72. DOI ScienceOn |
10 | Henseler H, Smith J, Bowman A, et al. Subjective versus objective assessment of breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013;66:634-9. DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Fortin AJ, Cheang M, Latosinsky S. Cosmetic outcomes following breast conservation therapy: in search of a reliable scale. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;100:65-70. DOI |
12 | Yesilada AK, Sevim KZ, Sirvan SS, et al. Our surgical approach to treatment of congenital, developmental, and acquired breast asymmetries: a review of 30 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37:77-87. DOI ScienceOn |
13 | Kasielska A, Antoszewski B. Surgical management of gynecomastia: an outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg 2013;71:471-5. DOI |
14 | Harris JR, Levene MB, Svensson G, et al. Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1979;5:257-61. DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Radovan C. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy using the temporary expander. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;69:195-208. DOI ScienceOn |
16 | Yanko-Arzi R, Cohen MJ, Braunstein R, et al. Breast reconstruction: complication rate and tissue expander type. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:489-96. DOI |
17 | Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J 3rd, et al. Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:89-97. DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Baxter NN, Virnig BA, Durham SB, et al. Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:443-8. DOI ScienceOn |
19 | Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106: 1014-25. DOI ScienceOn |
20 | American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2012 Plastic surgery statistics report [Internet]. Arlington Heights; American Society of Plastic Surgeons: c2013 [cited 2013 May 26]. Available from: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/news-resources/statistics/2012-Plastic-Surgery-Statistics/reconstructive-surgery-demographics.pdf. |
21 | Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:345-53. DOI ScienceOn |
22 | Bezuhly M, Bucholtz J, Sigurdson L. Less scarring or more symmetry? Reconstruction following metachronous bilateral breast cancer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65: 1595-7. DOI ScienceOn |
23 | Craft RO, Colakoglu S, Curtis MS, et al. Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:1417-24. DOI ScienceOn |
24 | Gust MJ, Nguyen KT, Hirsch EM, et al. Use of the tabbed expander in latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2013;47:126-9. DOI ScienceOn |
25 | Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:823-37. DOI ScienceOn |