Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.5.542

Nostril Base Augmentation Effect of Alveolar Bone Graft  

Lee, Woojin (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
Park, Hyung Joon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
Choi, Hyun Gon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
Shin, Dong Hyeok (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
Uhm, Ki Il (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.40, no.5, 2013 , pp. 542-545 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background The aims of alveolar bone grafting are closure of the fistula, stabilization of the maxillary arch, support for the roots of the teeth adjacent to the cleft on each side. We observed nostril base augmentation in patients with alveolar clefts after alveolar bone grafting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the nostril base augmentation effect of secondary alveolar bone grafting in patients with unilateral alveolar cleft. Methods Records of 15 children with alveolar clefts who underwent secondary alveolar bone grafting with autogenous iliac cancellous bone between March of 2011 and May of 2012 were reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative worm's-eye view photographs and reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans were used for photogrammetry. The depression of the nostril base and thickness of the philtrum on the cleft side were measured in comparison to the normal side. The depression of the cleft side pyriform aperture was measured in comparison to the normal side on reconstructed three-dimensional CT. Results Significant changes were seen in the nostril base (P=0.005), the philtrum length (P=0.013), and the angle (P=0.006). The CT measurements showed significant changes in the pyriform aperture (P<0.001) and the angle (P<0.001). Conclusions An alveolar bone graft not only fills the gap in the alveolar process but also augments the nostril base after surgery. In this study, only an alveolar bone graft was performed to prevent bias from other procedures. Nostril base augmentation can be achieved by performing alveolar bone grafts in children, in whom invasive methods are not advised.
Keywords
Alveolar process; Cleft palate; Alveoloplasty; Bone transplantation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hoffman WY, Mount D. Cleft palate repair. In: Mathes SJ, Hentz VR, editors. Plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Vol. 4. Philadelphia: Sanders Elsevier; 2006. p.263-6.
2 Bergland O, Semb G, Abyholm FE. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J 1986;23:175-205.
3 United Nations Human Rights. 2002 Convention on the Rights of the Child [Internet]. Geneva: Switzerland; c2013 [cited 2013 Aug 17]. Available from: http://www.ohchr. org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx.
4 Hoffman WY, Mount D. Cleft palate repair. In: Mathes SJ, Hentz VR, editors. Plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: Sanders Elsevier; 2006. p.159-161.
5 Lee C, Crepeau RJ, Williams HB, et al. Alveolar cleft bone grafts: results and imprecisions of the dental radiograph. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:1534-8.   DOI
6 Kim JR, Jin SJ, Cho YC, et al. Clinical study of autogenous secondary bone grafting in cleft maxilla. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;23:162-8.
7 Stassen LF. Alveolar bone grafting-how I do it. In: Booth PW, Hausamen JE, Schendel SA, editors. Maxillofacial surgery. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p.1047-55.
8 Kim KR, Kim S, Baek SH. Change in grafted secondary alveolar bone in patients with UCLP and UCLA: a threedimensional computed tomography study. Angle Orthod 2008;78:631-40.   DOI
9 Farkas LG, Bryson W, Klotz J. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable? Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;66:346-55.   DOI
10 Bearn DR, Sandy JR, Shaw WC. Photogrammetric assessment of the soft tissue profile in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002;39:597-603.   DOI
11 Han K, Kwon HJ, Choi TH, et al. Comparison of anthropometry with photogrammetry based on a standardized clinical photographic technique using a cephalostat and chair. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010;38:96-107.   DOI