Browse > Article

Implant Breast Reconstruction Using Porcine Dermal Matrix ($Permacol^{(R)}$): A Comparative Study with Acellular Cadaveric Dermis ($AlloDerm^{(R)}$)  

Jeong, Bo-Rham (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Roh, Tai-Suk (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Kim, Young-Seok (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Hong, Jong-Won (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Rah, Dong-Kyun (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.38, no.5, 2011 , pp. 559-566 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The use of tissue expander/implant in breast reconstruction using tissue expander-implant is one of the most common surgical procedures. The use of AlloDerm as a sling to reestablish the lower pole of the pectoralis major muscle results a decrease in morbidity compared with more invasive procedures. However the use of AlloDerm is more expensive than other options. We decided to compare AlloDerm with Permacol, which has been safely used in human body reconstruction and is less costly than AlloDerm. Methods: After mastectomy, the inferolateral origin of the pectoralis major muscle was elevated. Either AlloDerm or Permacol was sutured to the chest wall at the level of the previously marked inframammary fold. The lower border of the pectoralis major muscle and the upper portion of the crescent-shaped piece of either AlloDerm or Permacol was sutured together using a tension free technique, and a tissue expander was subsequently inserted into the subpectoral-subAlloDerm (or Permacol) dual pocket. Results: AlloDerm was used in twenty-one patients (28 breasts) and Permacol was used in six patients (11 breasts) for tissue expander-implant breast reconstruction. During the mean follow-up period of 17 months (8~25 months). Two infections (7%) occurred in AlloDerm cases and four infections (36%) occurred in Permacol cases. Conclusion: This study is the first comparison of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction using AlloDerm and Permacol. The use of Permacol resulted in more postoperative infection compared with the use of AlloDerm. This report is still limited with the small number of cases studied.
Keywords
Breast reconstruction; Permacol; AlloDerm; Tissue expansion;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Breuing KH, Warren SM: Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg 55: 232, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Serra-Renom JM, Fontdevila J, Monner J, Benito J: Mammary reconstruction using tissue expander and partial detachment of the pectoralis major muscle to expand the lower breast quadrants. Ann Plast Surg 53: 317, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Gamboa-Bobadilla GM: Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 56: 22, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Salzberg CA: Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg 57: 1, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Bindingnavele V, Gaon M, Ota KS, Kulber DA, Lee DJ: Use of acellular cadaveric dermis and tissue expansion in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60: 1214, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Preminger BA, McCarthy CM, Hu QY, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ: The influence of AlloDerm on expander dynamics and complications in the setting of immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a matched-cohort study. Ann Plast Surg 60: 510, 2008   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Harper C: Permacol: clinical experience with a new biomaterial. Hosp Med 62: 90, 2001   DOI
8 Hsu PW, Salgado CJ, Kent K, Finnegan M, Pello M, Simons R, Atabek U, Kann B: Evaluation of porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) used in abdominal wall reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62: 1484, 2009   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Benito-Ruiz J, Guisantes E, Serra-Renom JM: Porcine dermal collagen: a new option for soft-tissue reconstruction of the lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 117: 2517, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Yoon JH, Kim YS, Roh TS, Rha DK: Implant breast reconstruction using AlloDerm sling, clinical outcomes and effect to capsular formation. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 36: 755, 2009
11 Deeken CR, Melman L, Jenkins ED, Greco SC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD: Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 212: 880, 2011   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Jarman-Smith ML, Bodamyali T, Stevens C, Howell JA, Horrocks M, Chaudhuri JB: Porcine collagen crosslinking, degradation, and its capability for fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15: 925, 2004   DOI