Browse > Article

Body Contouring of Breast and Abdomen with Belt Dermolipectomy after Massive Weight Loss: A Case Report  

Kim, Jong-Sok (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Seo, Je-Won (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Oh, Deuk-Young (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Lee, Jung-Ho (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Ahn, Sang-Tae (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Rhie, Jong-Won (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.37, no.5, 2010 , pp. 681-686 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Obese proportion is increasing universally, estimating more than a billion. So reducing the weight became one of the topic in medical market. Not only diet, exercise, medication, but also many surgical procedures are being developed, such as sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass surgery. After massive weight loss, skin excess and laxity occurs, leading to unsatisfying body contour. Body contouring surgery including abdominoplasty, breast reduction is performed when skin excess is present in abdomen and breast. When skin excess is present circumferentially, belt dermolipectomy is the treatment of choice. Methods: A 23-year-old man had weight gain since he was 12 of age. A year before visiting to our department, his height was 168 cm, weight was 150 kg and body mass index (BMI) was 53.15 kg/$m^2$. The patient lost 55 kg of his weight through exercise and diet control. When he visited again, his weight was 95 kg and BMI was 33.66 kg/$m^2$. In physical examination, skin excess and laxity was seen in both breast and abdomen circumferentially and lateral folds were seen in the back. Abdominal contour deformity (Pitman classification type 6) and pseudogynecomastia (grade 3) were present in both breast. Belt dermolipectomy of abdomen, both breast and lateral folds was performed, resecting 6,400 g of tissue and additive 1,200 g through revisional operation. Results: The patient lost 6,500g of his weight and BMI reduced by 2.3 kg/$m^2$. The patient's hospital course was uneventful during 5 weeks of hospitalization and he was satisfied with his final body contour. Conclusion: Body contouring with belt dermolipectomy in patient who has circumferential skin excess and laxity after massive weight loss can be a treatment of choice.
Keywords
Weight loss; Obesity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Shermak MA, Bluebond-Lngner R, Chang D: Maintenance of weight loss after body contouring surgery for massive weight loss. Plast Reconstr Surg 121: 2114, 2008   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Fuente del Campo A, Rojas Allegretti E, Fernandez Filho JA, Gordon CB: Regional dermolipectomy as treatment for sequelae of massive weight loss. World J Surg 22: 974, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Gusenoff JA, Coon D, Rubin JP: Pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: detectability of technique, patient satisfaction, and classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 122: 1301, 2008   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Murshid M, Khalid KN, Shakir A, Bener A: Abdominoplasty in obese and in morbidly obese patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63: 820, 2010   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Wallach SG: Abdominal contour surgery for the massive weight loss patient: the fleur-de-lis approach. Aesthet Surg J 25: 454, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
6 SE Kim, JJ Kim, JH Jeong, JH Seul: Abdominal dermoli-pectomy. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 22: 152, 1995
7 Nahai FR, Nahai F: MOC-PSSM CME Article: Breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 121: 1, 2008
8 Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Boyd JB: The versatile deep inferior epigastric (inferior rectus abdominis) flap. Br J Plast Surg 37: 330, 1984   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R: Alteration of nipple-areolar sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 115: 743, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn