Browse > Article

Efficacy of Aquacell® Dressing in Partial Thickness Burn Patients  

Park, Jae Hyun (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital and School of Medicine)
Na, Young Chun (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital and School of Medicine)
Cho, Kyu Sung (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital and School of Medicine)
Yu, Su Jin (Department of Emergency Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital and School of Medicine)
Ahn, Hun Cheol (Department of Emergency Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital and School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.32, no.4, 2005 , pp. 491-495 More about this Journal
Abstract
In partial thickness burn injuries, silver sulfadiazine cream 1%(SSD, $Silvadene^{(R)}$) is the most commonly used topical agent worldwide. But silver sulfadiazine cream 1% has no exudate absorption property. Usually after escar is removed from wound surface, $Silvadene^{(R)}$ is changed to saline wet gauze dressing to promote epithelization. $Aquacel^{(R)}$(ConvaTec, UK) is a 100% sodium carboxymethylcellulose Hydrofiber material. It absorbs exudates directly into the hydrofibers by vertical wicking which allows rapid uptake of liquid into the fibers. The absorbed exudate fluid can be distributed to the entire dressing rather than just over the wound surface, which results in larger fluid absorption capacity. From April, 2003 to July, 2004 a study was done with 40 patients who had variable partial thickness burns. $Aquacel^{(R)}$ dressing was compared in 21 cases to silver sulfadiazine cream 1% and saline wet gauze dressings in 19 cases. In the $Aquacel^{(R)}$ cases, the average healing time on the face was $5.36{\pm}1.69$ a day; on the hands was $8.46{\pm}2.15$ a day; and, on the neck was $6.0{\pm}2.0$ a day. With the $Silvadene^{(R)}$ and Saline wet gauze dressing, the average healing time on the face was $6.44{\pm}1.74$ a day; on the hands was $13.79{\pm}5.35$ a day; and, on the neck was $11.17{\pm}3.31$ a day. As a result, the $Aquacel^{(R)}$ group showed a shorter healing time compared to the $Silvadene^{(R)}$ and saline wet gauze dressing group and patients were satisfied because of less pain and improved comfort. In conclusion, $Aquacel^{(R)}$ is a better choice for partial thickness burn injuries because of shorter healing time, less pain and more confortable dressing.
Keywords
Superficial burn injury, $Aquacel^{(R)}$; Silver sulfadiazine;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hansbrough JF: Wound healing in partial thickness bum wounds treated with collagenase ointment versus silver sulfadiazine cream. J Bum Care Rehabil 16; 241, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Hermans MHE: Results of a survey on use of different treatment options for partial and full thickness burns. Burns 24: 539, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Caruso DM: Aquacel Ag in the management of Partialthickness burns: Results of a clinical trial. J Burn Care Rehabil 25: 89, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Kang JS: Plastic Surgery. 3rd Ed. Koonja Co., 2004, p 471
5 Waring MJ, Parasons D: Physico-chemical characterisation of carboxymethylated spun cellulose fibers. Biomaterials 22: 903, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Zawacki BE: The natural history of reversible burn injury. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139: 867, 1974
7 Vincent Falanga: Occlusive wound dressings. Arch Dermatol 124: 872, 1988   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Williams C: An investigation into the benefits of AQUACELL hydrofiber wound dressing. Br J Nurs 8: 676, 1999   DOI
9 Moseley R: Comparison of the antioxidant properties of HYAFF$^{\circledR}$-11p75, AQUACEL$^{\circledR}$ and hyaluronan towards reactive oxygen species in vitro. Biomaterials 23: 2255, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Vloemans AFPM: A newly developed hydrofibre dressing, in the treatment of partial thickness burns. Burns 27: 167, March, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn