Browse > Article

Clinical Experience and Efficacy of Lipomatic(R) Liposuction(The Vibroliposuction)  

Lee, Su-Sang (포천중문대학교)
Gang, Sang-Yun (포천중문대학교)
Jo, Sang-Heon (포천중문대학교)
Publication Information
Archives of Plastic Surgery / v.31, no.4, 2004 , pp. 513-519 More about this Journal
Abstract
The liposculpting has become one of the most popular aesthetic operations. Lipomatic(R) technique was recently developed for solving several problems. The principle of operation is the prepagation of oscillation wave energy created by compressed air to the cannula, so that it can dislodge only the fat globules. So they can be more easily extracted from the body through the tube in shorter time. In this study, 48 cases of liposuction using Lipomatic(R) were performed from March,2001 to March,2003 in Bundang CHA hospital. We compared the preoperative amount of hemoglobin, circumference of each area and weights with postoperative results. Furthermore, we measured the amount of infiltration solution and aspirated fat. The average of infiltrated and aspirated volume were 2241ml and 1935ml, respectively. The average decrease in hemoglobin value was 0.8mg/dl. The mean weight loss was 0.9kg. The average decrease in circumference was 9.6cm in abdomen, 4.6cm in thigh, 3.6cm in upper arm and 3.5cm in calf, respectively. There were no serious side effects; the patients were nearly all satisfied with the result of good body contouring. The patients were benefited from the shorter operation time, less bleeding, less hematoma, less ecchymosis, less swelling and less pain compared with those who took the other methods in our experience. In addition, the operator was benefited from the shorter operation time, less physical effort and more accuracy. We conclude that Lipomatic(R) liposuction is effective, reliable and safe method compare with conventional liposuction methods.
Keywords
Lipomatic(R) liposuction; Vibroliposuction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Yi SB, Choi MH, Hwang JW, Yang WS, Baik BS: Effects of ultrasound liposuction on the fat and muscle of pig. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 25: 1236, 1998
2 Fodor PB, Watson J: Personal Experience with Ultrasound-Assisted Lipoplasty: A Pilot Study Comparing Ultrasound-Assisted Lipoplasty with Traditional Lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 101: 1103, 1998
3 Karmo FR, Milan MF, Silbergleit A: Blood loss in major liposuction procedures: A comparison study using suction-assisted versus ultrasonically assisted lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 108: 241, 2001
4 Commons GW, Halperin B: Ultrasound-Assisted Lipoplasty: A Clinical study of 250 Consecutive Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 101: 203, 1998
5 Tebbetts JB: Minimizing Complications of Ultrasound- Assisted Lipoplasty: An Initial Experience with No related Complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 102: 1690, 1998
6 Lee DH, Cho BC, Lee JH, Baek BS: Change of temperature of cannula and its influence on muscles, vessels, and nerves during ultrasonic liposuction. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 24: 264, 1997
7 Lee YH, Park HY: Suction-assisted abdominal lipectomy in Korean women-Clinical analysis of 28 cases. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 20: 776, 1993
8 Kim YH, Lee KH, Seul JH: Large-volume liposuction on abdomen, gluteal thigh and calves. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 21: 773, 1994
9 Young VL and the Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation DATA committee: Power -Assisted Lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 108: 1429, 2001
10 Fodor PB, Vogt PA: Power-Assisted Lipoplasty (PAL): A Clinical Pilot Study Comparing PAL to Traditional Lipoplasty (TL). Aesth Plast Surg 23: 379, 1999
11 Rohrich RJ, Beran SJ, Kenkel JM, Adams WP Jr., DiSpaltro F: Extending the Role of Liposuction in Body Contouring with Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 101: 1090, 1998