Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2019.35.1.037

Receptor Binding Affinities of Synthetic Cannabinoids Determined by Non-Isotopic Receptor Binding Assay  

Cha, Hye Jin (Pharmacological Research Division, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Song, Yun Jeong (Pharmacological Research Division, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Lee, Da Eun (Pharmacological Research Division, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Kim, Young-Hoon (Pharmacological Research Division, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Shin, Jisoon (Pharmacological Research Division, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Jang, Choon-Gon (Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University)
Suh, Soo Kyung (Pharmacological Research Division, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Kim, Sung Jin (Cosmetics Policy Division, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Yun, Jaesuk (Neuroimmunology Lab, College of Pharmacy, Wonkwang University)
Publication Information
Toxicological Research / v.35, no.1, 2019 , pp. 37-44 More about this Journal
Abstract
A major predictor of the efficacy of natural or synthetic cannabinoids is their binding affinity to the cannabinoid type I receptor ($CB_1$) in the central nervous system, as the main psychological effects of cannabinoids are achieved via binding to this receptor. Conventionally, receptor binding assays have been performed using isotopes, which are inconvenient owing to the effects of radioactivity. In the present study, the binding affinities of five cannabinoids for purified $CB_1$ were measured using a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technique as a putative non-isotopic receptor binding assay. Results were compared with those of a radio-isotope-labeled receptor binding assay. The representative natural cannabinoid ${\Delta}^9$-tetrahydrocannabinol and four synthetic cannabinoids, JWH-015, JWH-210, RCS-4, and JWH-250, were assessed using both the SPR biosensor assay and the conventional isotopic receptor binding assay. The binding affinities of the test substances to $CB_1$ were determined to be (from highest to lowest) $9.52{\times}10^{-3}M$ (JWH-210), $6.54{\times}10^{-12}M$ (JWH-250), $1.56{\times}10^{-11}M$ (${\Delta}^9$-tetrahydrocannabinol), $2.75{\times}10^{-11}M$ (RCS-4), and $6.80{\times}10^{-11}M$ (JWH-015) using the non-isotopic method. Using the conventional isotopic receptor binding assay, the same order of affinities was observed. In conclusion, our results support the use of kinetic analysis via SPR in place of the isotopic receptor binding assay. To replace the receptor binding affinity assay with SPR techniques in routine assays, further studies for method validation will be needed in the future.
Keywords
${\Delta}^9$-THC; Human cannabinoid type I receptor ($CB_1$); Receptor binding assay; Surface plasmon resonance; Synthetic cannabinoids;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cooper, Z.D. (2016) Adverse effects of synthetic cannabinoids: management of acute toxicity and withdrawal. Curr. Psych. Rep., 18, 52.   DOI
2 Fattore, L. (2016) Synthetic cannabinoids - Further evidence supporting the relationship between cannabinoids and psychosis. Biol. Psych., 79, 539-548.   DOI
3 Gray, R., Bressington, D., Hughes, E. and Ivanecka, A. (2016) A systematic review of the effects of novel psychoactive substances 'legal highs' on people with severe mental illness. J. Psych. Ment. Health Nurs., 23, 267-281.   DOI
4 Springer, Y.P., Gerona, R., Scheunemann, E., Shafer, S.L., Lin, T., Banister, S.D. and McLaughlin, J.B. (2016) Increase in adverse reactions associated with use of synthetic cannabinoids - Anchorage, Alaska, 2015-2016. MMWR Morb. Mort. Wkly Rep., 65, 1108-1111.   DOI
5 White, C.M. (2017) The pharmacologic and clinical effects of illicit synthetic cannabinoids. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 57, 297-304.   DOI
6 Diez-Alarcia, R., Ibarra-Lecue, I., Lopez-Cardona, A.P., Meana, J., Gutierrez-Adan, A., Callado, L.F. and Uriguen, L. (2016) Biased agonism of three different cannabinoid receptor agonists in mouse brain cortex. Front. Pharmacol., 7, 415.
7 McPartland, J.M., Glass, M. and Pertwee, R.G. (2007) Metaanalysis of cannabinoid ligand binding affinity and receptor distribution: interspecies differences. Br. J. Pharmacol., 152, 583-593.   DOI
8 Layer, R.T. (2001) Saturation analysis of ligand binding using a centrifugation procedure. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci., 2, 7.7.1-7.7.4.   DOI
9 Rossi, A.M. and Taylor, C.W. (2013) High-throughput fluorescence polarization assay of ligand binding to $IP_3$ receptors. Cold Spring Harb. Prot., 2013, 938-946.
10 Martinez-Pinilla, E., Rabal, O., Reyes-Resina, I., Zamarbide, M., Navarro, G., Sanchez-Arias, J.A. and Franco, R. (2016) Two affinity sites of the cannabinoid subtype 2 receptor identified by a novel homogeneous binding assay. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 358, 580-587.   DOI
11 Hoa, X.D., Kirk, A.G. and Tabrizian, M. (2007) Towards integrated and sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensors: a review of recent progress. Biosens. Bioelectron., 23, 151-160.   DOI
12 Myint, K.Z. and Xie, X.Q. (2015) Ligand biological activity predictions using fingerprint-based artificial neural networks (FANN-QSAR). Methods Mol. Biol., 1260, 149-164.   DOI
13 Piliarik, M., Vaisocherova, H. and Homola, J. (2009) Surface plasmon resonance biosensing. Methods Mol. Biol., 503, 65-88.   DOI
14 Cha, H.J., Lee, K., Song, M., Hyeon, Y., Hwang, J., Jang, C. and Jeong, H. (2014) Dependence potential of the synthetic cannabinoids JWH-073, JWH-081, and JWH-210: In vivo and in vitro approaches. Biomol. Ther. (Seoul), 22, 363-369.   DOI
15 Mella-Raipan, J., Hernandez-Pino, S., Morales-Verdejo, C. and Pessoa-Mahana, D. (2014) 3D-QSAR/CoMFA-based structure-affinity/selectivity relationships of aminoalkylindoles in the cannabinol $CB_1$ and $CB_2$ receptors. Molecules, 19, 2842-2861.   DOI
16 Cereghino, J.L. and Cregg, J.M. (2000) Heterologous protein expression in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 24, 45-66.   DOI
17 Reilander, H. and Weiss, H.M. (1998) Production of G-protein-coupled receptors in yeast. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 9, 510-517.   DOI
18 Smoum, R., Baraghithy, S., Chourasia, M., Breuer, A., Mussai, N., Nttar-Namdar, M. and Bab, I. (2015) $CB_2$ cannabinoid receptor agonist enantiomers HU-433 and HU-308: An inverse relationship between binding affinity and biological potency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 112, 8774-8779.   DOI
19 Kim, T.K., Zhang, R., Feng, W., Cai, J., Pierce, W. and Song, Z.H. (2005) Expression and characterization of human $CB_1$ cannabinoid receptor in methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Protein. Expr. Purif., 40, 60-70.   DOI
20 Presley, C.S., Abidi, A.H. and Moore, B.M., 2nd. (2016) Cannabinoid receptor 1 ligands revisited: Pharmacological assessment in the ACTOne system. Anal. Biochem., 498, 8-28.   DOI
21 Tournebize, J., Gibaja, V. and Kahn, J.P. (2016) Acute effects of synthetic cannabinoids: update 2015. Subst. Abuse, 11, 1-23.
22 Wiley, J.L., Marusich, J.A., Lefever, T.W., Antonazzo, K.R., Wallgren, M.T., Cortes, R.A. and Thomas, B.F. (2015) ABCHMINACA, AB-PINACA, and FUBIMINA: Affinity and potency of novel synthetic cannabinoids in producing ${\Delta}^9$-tetrahydrocannabinol-like effects in mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 354, 328-339.   DOI
23 Cha, H.J., Lee, K., Song, M., Hyeon, Y., Hwang, J., Jang, C., Ahn, J., Jeon, S., Kim, H., Kim, Y., Seong, W., Kang, H., Yoo, H.S. and Jeong, H. (2014) Dependence potential of the synthetic cannabinoids JWH-073, JWH-081, and JWH-210: in vivo and in vitro approaches. Biomol. Ther. (Seoul), 22, 363-369.   DOI
24 Roche, J.P., Bounds, S., Brown, S. and Mackie, K. (1999) A mutation in the second transmembrane region of the $CB_1$ receptor selectively disrupts G protein signaling and prevents receptor internalization. Mol. Cell. Pharmacol., 56, 611-618.   DOI
25 Karila, L., Benyaminia, A., Blecha, L., Cottencin, O. and Billieux, J. (2016) The synthetic cannabinoids phenomenon. Curr. Pharm. Des., 22, 6420-6425.   DOI
26 Scocard, A., Benyamina, A., Coscas, S. and Karila, L. (2017) Synthetic cannabinoids: A new addiction matrix. Pres. Med., 46, 11-22.   DOI
27 Paulke, A., Proschak, E., Sommer, K., Achenbach, J., Wunder, C. and Toennes, S.W. (2016) Synthetic cannabinoids: In silico prediction of the cannabinoid receptor 1 affinity by a quantitative structure-activity relationship model. Toxicol. Lett., 245, 1-6.   DOI
28 Maida, V. and Daeninck, P.J. (2016) A user's guide to cannabinoid therapies in oncology. Curr. Oncol., 23, 398-406.   DOI
29 Androvicova, R., Horacek, J., Stark, T., Drago, F. and Micale, V. (2017) Endocannabinoid system in sexual motivational processes: Is it a novel therapeutic horizon? Pharmacol. Res., 115, 200-208.   DOI
30 Ford, B.M., Tai, S., Fantegrossi, W.E. and Prather, P.L. (2017) Synthetic pot: not your grandfather's marijuana. Trend. Pharmacol. Sci., 38, 257-276.   DOI