Browse > Article

Study on the Concepts of Lee Jema's Way.Virtue.Nature.Imperative and the Contexts between Sasang Constitutional Medicine  

No Sang-Young (Department of internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Semyung University)
Ko Heung (Department of internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Semyung University)
Publication Information
Journal of Physiology & Pathology in Korean Medicine / v.19, no.5, 2005 , pp. 1137-1141 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper is written in order to investigate how Lee Je-Ma changed traditional Zhu Xi's philosophical view on Way(Tao; 道) Virtue(De: 德) Nature(Xing;性) and Imperative(Ming; 命), which was general concepts of his contemporary age, to practical philosophy and created new medical theories of Sasang(4 symbols) science from it. Lee emphasized the true thing which is able to be done in one's living not the concepts of Sasang. So he induced the concepts of Way and Virtue from the easy and simple way(易簡之道) in the Classic of Changes(I'Ching) for the purpose of practice by anyone. Because Nature and Imperative are derived from Way and Virtue in the context logically, human life is virtual in itself, so the substance of Nature and Imperative became equal with Way and Virtue. Herein the names and concepts of original 'Sasang' were substituted to Business(事), Mind(心), Body(身), Thing(物) which is able to be directly related with human being in his daily life. And he explained variously about the responses of Mind and Body of individuals onto Business and Thing. So it could be applied in medical aspects like emotional, symptomatical, characteristic features. Conclusively man is virtual being, so Nature and Imperative in the level of Human being are based on Way and Virtue in the level of Heaven. For that reason the new concepts of Sasang Business. Mind. Body Thing or Heaven. Human. Nature and Imperative were proposed.
Keywords
Way(Tao; 道); Virtue(De; 德); Nature(Xing; 性); Imperative(Ming; 命); Sasang Constitutional Medicine;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 成百曉 譯註, 大學.中庸集註, 전통문화연구회, 서울, pp 59-61, 1997.
2 李濟馬 原著 池圭鎔 譯解, 東武 格致藁譯解, 永林社, 서울, pp 34, 219-225, 2001.
3 金碩鎭 譯解, 周易傳義大全譯解, 대유학당, 서울, pp 195-196, 1344-1345, 1363-1371, 1376-1377, 1996.
4 成百曉 譯註, 論語集註, 전통문화연구회, 서울, 1997.
5 李濟馬 原著 이창일 역주, 東武遺鎬, 청계, 성남, pp 90-91, 1999.
6 成百曉 譯註, 孟子集註, 전통문화연구회, 서울, 1997.
7 韓國東洋哲學會 編, 東洋哲學의 本體論과 人性論, 연세대학교 출판부, 서울, pp 192-220, 1982.
8 朴永浩 역.저, 莊子, 두레, 서울, 1999.
9 李濟馬 原著 金達來 編譯, 東醫壽世保元 草藁, 鼎談, 서울, pp 3, 22-24, 1999.
10 이상옥 譯解, 管子, 명문당, 서울, 1985.
11 한방병리학, 전국한의대병리학교실편, 일중사, pp 12-14, 20, 2002.
12 馮契主編 哲學大辭典 上海辭書出版社, 上海, p 1042, 1052, 1598, 1992.
13 사상의학, 전국한의과대학사상의학교실 편, 집문당, pp 83, 94-95, 337-341, 346-347, 1997.
14 남만성.김상일 譯解, 四書五經 左民傳, 삼성문화사, 대구, 1982.