Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.21219/jitam.2021.28.6.145

A Study on the Privacy Paradox in the IoT-based Smart Home Camera Usage Environment: Focusing on a Comparative Study of User Experience  

Lyu, JinDan (MIS Department in Chungbuk National University)
Kwon, Sundong (MIS Department in Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management / v.28, no.6, 2021 , pp. 145-161 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, as personal information utilization devices such as IoT, artificial intelligence, and wearable devices that focus on the individual have spread, privacy violations are also increasing. However, the privacy paradox of providing personal information to enjoy services while worrying is getting stronger. However, there are still preliminary studies on this. In this study, an intelligent home camera based on IoT technology was selected as a research object, and whether privacy paradox exists in the IoT environment, including smart home camera, was studied. To this end, the effect of perceived usefulness, a benefit factor of smart home camera use, and privacy concern, a risk factor, on intention to use was verified. In addition, it was investigated whether the relationship between privacy concerns and intention to use differs according to the presence or absence of use experience. In order to verify the research model, a survey was conducted with people with and without experience in using smart home cameras, and a total of 298 data samples were used for statistical analysis. As a result of the analysis, it was found that both perceived usefulness and privacy concerns had a positive effect on the intention to use, proving that privacy paradox exists in the IoT-based smart home camera environment. In addition, by analyzing the fact that privacy concerns have different effects on usage intentions depending on the user experience, it was verified that those with experience have a strong privacy paradox and those without experience have a weak privacy paradox. This study is meaningful because it seeks strategic implications to improve service and business performance by understanding the relationship between privacy attitudes and behaviors of IoT service providers, including smart home cameras.
Keywords
Privacy Paradox; Smart Home Camera; Perceived Usability; Privacy Concerns;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, H. J. and Jung, C. H., "The Impacts of Commodity and User Characteristics on Customers' Intention to Reuse in Mobile Banking Services", The Journal of Business Education, Vol. 21, 2008, pp. 215-246.
2 Acquisti, A. and Grossklags, J., "Privacy and rationality in individual decision making", IEEE Security & Privacy, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2005, pp. 26-33.   DOI
3 Aleisa, N., Renaud, K., and Bongiovanni, I., "The privacy paradox applies to IoT devices too: A Saudi Arabian study", Computers & Security, Vol. 96, 101897, 2020.   DOI
4 Barth, S. and De Jong, M. D., "The privacy paradox: Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior: A systematic literature review", Telematics and informatics, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2017, pp. 1038-1058.   DOI
5 Belanger, F. and Crossler, R. E., "Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2011, pp. 1017-1041.   DOI
6 Chae, J. M., "The Effect of Mobile Fashion Shopping Characteristics on Consumer's Purchase Intention: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model", Fashion & Textile Research Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2016, pp. 38-47.   DOI
7 Chae, J. M., "The Effects of Shopping Value, Ease of Use, and Usefulness on Mobile Purchase Intention", Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion & sensibility, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2017, pp. 73-86.   DOI
8 Choi, G. B., "An Empirical Study on the Post Acceptance of Mobile Banking Service", Internet E-commerce Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2012, pp. 1-27.   DOI
9 Choi, S. J., "An Empirical Study of Social Network Service (SNS) Continuance: Incorporating the Customer Value-Satisfaction-Loyalty Model into the IS Continuance Model", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2013, pp. 1-28.   DOI
10 Davis, F. D., "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1989, pp. 319-340.   DOI
11 Zhao, L., Lu, Y., and Gupta, S., "Disclosure intention of location-related information in location-based social network service", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2012, pp. 53-89.   DOI
12 Gao, T., Sultan, T. F., and Rohm, A. J., "Factors influencing Chinese youth consumers' acceptance of mobile marketing", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 27, No. 7, 2010, pp. 574-583.   DOI
13 Pal, D., Arpnikanondt, C., and Razzaque, M. A., "Personal Information Disclosure via Voice Assistants: The PersonalizationPrivacy Paradox", SN Computer Science, Vol. 1, No. 5, 2020, pp. 1-17.   DOI
14 Bhattacherjee, A., "An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance", Decision support systems, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2001, pp. 201-214.   DOI
15 Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., and Zarantonello, L., "Brand experience: What is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty?", Journal of marketing, Vol.73, No. 3, 2009, pp. 52-68.   DOI
16 Kuratko, D. F., "Entrepreneurial leadership in the 21st century: Guest editor's perspective", Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2007, pp. 1-11.   DOI
17 Pavlou, P. A., "Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce : Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2003, pp. 101-134.   DOI
18 Fishbach, A. and Dhar, R., "Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2005, pp. 370-377.   DOI
19 Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F., "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of marketing research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1981, pp. 39-50.   DOI
20 Ginosar, A. and Ariel, Y., "An analytical framework for online privacy research: What is missing?", Information & Management, Vol. 54, No. 7, 2017, pp. 948-957.   DOI
21 Hassenzahl, M., "User experience (UX) towards an experiential perspective on product quality", In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l'Interaction HommeMachine, 2008, pp. 11-15.
22 Hoch, S. J., "Product experience is seductive", Journal of consumer research, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2002, pp. 448-454.   DOI
23 Kwon, S. H., Lim, Y. W., and Kim, H. J., "A study on the usage intention of AI(artificial intelligence) speaker", Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2020, pp. 199-206.   DOI
24 Lee, K. T. and Noh, M. J., "Factors Influencing the Usage Intention of Social Commerce: The Relationship between the Technology Acceptance Model and the Consumers' Perceived Risk", Consumption Culture Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2011, pp. 165-182.   DOI
25 Yim, M. S., "Understanding the Factors that influence Website Retention and Privacy Unconcern After the Disclosure of Privacy Information", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2013, pp. 107-119.   DOI
26 Park, J. Y. and Kwak, K. Y., "Motivational Factors Affecting Self-Disclosure Behavior of SNS Users", Korean Management Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2019, pp. 561-587.   DOI
27 Park, S. A. and Choi, S. M., "A Understanding the Factors Influencing Satisfaction and Continued Use Intention of AI speakers: Focusing on the Utilitarian and Hedonic Values", The Journal of Information Society, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2018, pp. 159-182.
28 Jun, S. Y., Ho, H. J., and Kang, S. J., "The Effects of Risk Perception on the Relative Role of Brand and Price in Internet Shopping Mall", Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2003, pp. 19-43.
29 Kim, Y. K., "Six components of Smart Home (Home IoT) Ecosystem - Communication, Home appliance, and IT companies need mutual cooperation for Global Competitiveness", Digico Report, KT Economic Management Research Institute, 2014.
30 Kokolakis, S., "Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon", Computers & security, Vol. 64, 2017, pp. 122-134.   DOI
31 Kim, M., "Privacy Protection Technologies on IoT Environments: Case Study of Networked Cameras", The Korea Contents Society, Vol. 16, No. 9, 2016, pp. 329-338.   DOI
32 Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., and Chervany, N. L., "Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and postadoption beliefs", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2. 1999, pp. 183-213.   DOI
33 Kim, J. I. and Kim, I. S., "A Study on how Smartphone Users Experiences Affect Consumer Loyalty Affect", Global Business Administration Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2014, pp. 179-203.   DOI
34 Kim, J. K. and Kim, S. H., "A Study on Privacy Paradox between Privacy Concern and Information Disclosure Behavior: Focus on Privacy Calculus Theory", Entrue Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2014, pp. 139-152.
35 Kim, Y. G. and Woo, E. J., "Privacy Concerns Within Personalization Based on the Internet of Things(IoT): A Perspective from the Privacy Paradox", The Tourism Sciences Society Of Korea, Vol. 42, No. 7, 2018, pp. 71-84.
36 Choi, H. S., Lee, M. S., and Lee, H. M., "Is There a Privacy Paradox in the Online Purchasing Context?: The Study on the Effects of Privacy Concern and Online Purchasing Behavior", Journal of Product Research, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2019, pp. 1-13.   DOI
37 Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., and Xu, H., "Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2011, pp. 989-1015.   DOI
38 Lee, A. R., "The Privacy Paradox and User Values in Internet of Things: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy and Differences between Groups of Demographic Characteristics", The E-business Studies, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2020, pp. 205-223.   DOI
39 Lee, J. M. and Rha, J. Y., "Personalization-privacy paradox and consumer conflict with the use of location-based mobile commerce", Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 63, 2016, pp. 453-462.   DOI
40 Shin, I. S. and Kim, H. S., "Privacy Concerns and SNS Activities: Focusing on the Validity and Explanations of the Existence of a Privacy Paradox", Korean Telecommunications Oolicy Review, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2018, pp. 33-67.
41 Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., and Burke, S. J., "Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1996, pp. 167-196.   DOI
42 Taddicken, M., "The 'privacy paradox'in the social web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure", Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 19,No. 2, 2014, pp. 248-273.
43 Son, J. and Kim, S., "Internet users' information privacy-protective responses", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2008, pp. 503-529.   DOI
44 Stanislav, M. and Beardsley, T., "Hacking IoT: A Case Study on Baby Monitor Exposures and Vulnerabilities", Rapid7's report, 2015.
45 Sun, Y., Wang, N., Shen, X. L., and Zhang, J. X., "Location information disclosure in location-based social network services: Privacy calculus, benefit structure, and gender differences", Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 52, 2015, pp. 278-292.   DOI
46 Letchumanan, M. and Muniandy, B., "Migrating to e-book: A study on perceived usefulness and ease of use", Library Hi Tech News, Vol. 30, No. 7. 2013, pp. 10-16.   DOI
47 Tam, K. Y. and Ho, S. Y., "Web personalization as a persuasion strategy: An elaboration likelihood model perspective", Information systems research, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2005, pp. 271-291.   DOI
48 Blank, G., Bolsover, G., and Dubois, E., "A new privacy paradox: Young people and privacy on social network sites", In Prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Vol. 17, 2014.
49 Lee, H. S., Lim, D. W., and Zo, H. J., "Personal Information Overload and User Resistance in the Big Data Age", Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2013, pp. 125-139.   DOI
50 Lee, M. N. and Shim, J. W., "The Moderating Effect by Gender in the Relationship between the Perception of Online Privacy and Use of Privacy Protection Strategy", Media, Gender & Culture, Vol. 12, 2009, pp. 165-190.
51 Thong, J. Y., Hong, S. J., and Tam, K. Y., "The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance", International Journal of human-computer studies, Vol. 64, No. 9, 2006, pp. 799-810.   DOI
52 Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., and Agarwal, J., "Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model", Information systems research, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2004, pp. 336-355.   DOI
53 Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., and Horne, D. A., "The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions Versus Behaviors", Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2007, pp. 100-126.   DOI
54 Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., and Lauro, C., "PLS path modeling: Computational statistics & data analysis", Cross Ref Web of Science, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2005, pp. 159-205.
55 Pavlou. P. A., "State of the information privacy literature: Where are we now and where should we go?", MIS quarterly, Vol.35, No.4. 2011, pp. 977-988.   DOI
56 Westin, A. F., "Privacy and Freedom", New York: Atheneum, 1967.
57 Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, H. J., and Hart, P., "Examining the formation of individual's privacy concerns: Toward an integrative view", 2008.
58 Xu, H., Luo, X. R., Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B., "The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for locationaware marketing", Decision support systems, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2011, pp. 42-52.   DOI
59 Barnes, S. B., "A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States", First Monday, Vol. 11, No. 9, 2006.
60 Guo, X., Zhang, X., and Sun, Y., "The privacy-personalization paradox in mHealth services acceptance of different age groups", Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 16, 2016, pp. 55-65.   DOI
61 Reynolds, B., Venkatanathan, J., Goncalves, J., and Kostakos, V., "Sharing Ephemeral Information in Online Social Networks: Privacy Perceptions and Behaviours", In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2011, pp. 204-215.
62 Shih, H. P., "An empirical study on predicting user acceptance of e-shopping on the Web," Information & Management, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2004, pp. 351-368.   DOI