Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.52.4.202112.153

Exploring the Revision Direction and Scope of the Korean Cataloging Rules for Religious Works  

Rho, Jee-Hyun (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / v.52, no.4, 2021 , pp. 153-177 More about this Journal
Abstract
The revision of the Korean Cataloging Rules (KCR) is in progress in order to conform IFLA LRM conceptual model and to strengthen its internal stability. Religious works, along with musical works and legal works, have been treated as special and important in cataloging rules. This trend continues in the new cataloging rules that seek a bibliographic model that interconnects related materials. However since KCR2(1966), there are no rules for access points or specific rules on religious works. Under the circumstances, this study analyzed (1) the contents of religious works in the recently revised cataloging rules, (2) the access points and their functions for religious works implemented in online catalogs and authority system, and finally (3) the direction and scope of KCR revision. As a result of the study, this study suggested that it is necessary to prepare detailed rules for preferred title and authorized access points for various religious works in KCR. In conclusion, some issues for further discussion were summarized.
Keywords
Korean Cataloging Rules; KCR; RDA; Access Point; Authorized Access Point; Religious Works; Authority; Uniform Title; Preferred Title; Description;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 RDA Steering Committee. RDA original toolkit. https://original.rdatoolkit.org/
2 Ahn, Seohyeon & Lee, Changsoo (2014). A study on the describing attributes and relationships of person in cataloging rules. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(3), 235-261.   DOI
3 Doh, Tae-Hyeon (2012). Study on instructions for access points representing works and expressions in RDA. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3), 27-48.   DOI
4 Doh, Tae-Hyeon (2015). Suggestions for the composition of KCR4 revision. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(4), 207-226.   DOI
5 Korean Library Association (1966). Korean Cataloging Rules. revised ed. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
6 Lee, Mihwa (2012). The study on the directions of KCR4 under the new ICP 2009. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(2), 261-280.   DOI
7 Lee, Mihwa (2016). A study on the construction of work and expression authority records. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(3), 71-94.   DOI
8 Lee, Mihwa (2018)). A study on the considerations in rules for authorized access points of music work. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(4), 147-166.   DOI
9 Rho, Jee-Hyun (2016a). Suggestions on the revision of Korean cataloging rules for personal name authority records and authorized access point. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2), 201-229.   DOI
10 Japan Library Association (2018). Nippon Cataloging Rules. 2018 ed. Tokyo: Japan Library Association. Available: https://www.jla.or.jp/committees/mokuroku/ncr2018/tabid/787/Default.aspx
11 Kim, Jeong-Hyen (2013). A study on the direction for the revision of Korean cataloguing rules. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(4), 123-143.   DOI
12 Lee, Mihwa & Rho, Jee-Hyun (2016). A study on the directions of authorized access points in KCR4. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(1), 47-69.   DOI
13 日本圖書館協會. 2018. 日本目錄規則 2018年版. 東京: 日本圖書館協會. Available: https://www.jla.or.jp/committees/mokuroku/ncr2018/tabid/787/Default.aspx
14 Korean Library Association (2003). Korean Cataloging Rules. 4th ed. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
15 Rho, Jee-Hyun (2016b). A study on the language and script of authorized access points representing multilingual works. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(4), 123-147.   DOI
16 Maxwell, M. F. (1989). Handbook for AACR2 1988 Revision: Explaining and Illustrating the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules. Chicago: American Library Association.
17 RDA Steering Committee. RDA toolkit. https://www.rdatoolkit.org/
18 Lee, Changsoo (2015). Describing attributes and relationships of families in cataloging rules. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(3), 27-49.   DOI