Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.201609.95

A Preliminary Study on the Semantic Network Analysis of Book Report Text  

Lee, Soo-Sang (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / v.47, no.3, 2016 , pp. 95-114 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this preliminary study is to collect specific examples of book reports and understand semantic characteristics of them through semantic network. The analysis was conducted with 23 book reports which classified by three groups. The keywords were selected from the of book reports. Five types of keyword network were composed based on co-occurrence relations with keywords. The result of this study is following these. First, each keyword network of book reports of groups and individuals is shown to have different structural characteristics. Second, each network has different high centrality keywords according to the result analysis of 3 types of centrality(degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality). These characteristic means that keyword network analysis is useful in recognizing the characteristics of not only groups' and but also individual's book reports.
Keywords
Book report; Semantic network analysis; Keyword network; Centrality;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 강여순. 2005. 서평쓰기 프로그램 구안. 국어교과교육연구, 9, pp.193-232.(Kang, Yeu-Soon. 2005. Book Review Writing Program. The Journal of Korean Arts Education Research, 9: 193-232.)
2 김병철. 2006. 한국 언론의 자살 보도에 관한 코퍼스 언어학적 분석: 신문과 텔레비전 방송을 중심으로. 스피치와 커뮤니케이션, 6, pp.252-275.(Byoung Cheol Kim. 2006. A Corpus-based Study of the Suicide News by Korean Newspapers & Television Networks. Speech & Communication, 6: 252-275.)
3 김용학. 2015. 한국 대중가요의 의미 연결망 - 1960년대부터 2000년대까지의 변화를 중심으로. 대중서사연구, 21(1), pp.145-171.(Kim, Yong-Hak. 2015. Semantic Network of Korean Pop Songs - Changing meaning Structure from 1960's to 2000's, Journal of Popular Narative, 21(1): 145-171.)
4 박동진. 2010. 독서 감상문 쓰기의 실태 - 구성 요소 분석을 중심으로. 새국어교육, 84, pp.109-125.(Dong Jin Park. 2010. Condition of Writing Book Reports. The Academy for Korean Language Education, 84: 109-125.)
5 신효필. 2005. 언어 자료의 통계 분석과 관련된 몇 가지 고려사항들. 어학연구, 41(3), pp.655-682.
6 이수상. 2012. 네트워크 분석 방법론, 논형.
7 이수상. 2014. 언어 네트워크 분석 방법을 활용한 학술논문의 내용분석. 정보관리학회지, 31(4), pp.49-68.(Soo-Sang Lee. 2014. A Content Analysis of Journal Articles Using the Language Network Analysis Methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4): 49-68.)   DOI
8 이재연. 2016. 키워드와 네트워크 : 토픽 모델링으로 본 개벽의 주제 지도 분석. 상허학보, 46, pp.277-334.(Lee, Jae-Yon. 2016. Keywords and Networks - Exploring the Thematic Maps of Kaebyoek through Topic Modelling. Sanghur Hakbo - The Journal of Korean Modern Literature, 46: 277-334.)
9 이훈구. 2010. 감정심리학, 이너북스.
10 전은진. 2015. 김수영 시와 신동문 시의 어휘 사용 양상과 네트워크 연구. 우리말연구, 41, pp.95-123.(Eun Jin Jeon. 2015. A Study on the Aspect of Words and the Network in the Poems of Kim Su-yeong & Shin Dong-mun. Urimal, 41: 95-123.)
11 정연창. 2015. 영어 형용사 smart와 clever의 사용에 관한 코퍼스 기반 분석과 언어 교육에 대한 시사점. 인문과학연구, 33, pp.71-105.(Yeon Chang Jung. 2015. A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Use of the English Adjectives smart and clever and Its Implications for Language Teaching. Sungshin Humanities Research, 33: 71-105.)