Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.201512.325

Building Corporate Information Governance to Prepare in Case of Litigation - Practical Implications of Sedona Conference Principles of Information Governance -  

Seol, Moon-Won (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / v.46, no.4, 2015 , pp. 325-354 More about this Journal
Abstract
Corporate information has great value, but also poses great risk. Information governance is an organization's coordinated, inter-disciplinary approach to satisfying information compliance requirements and managing information risks while optimizing information value. This study aims to suggest the directions of implementing information governance in business firms based on analyses of Sedona Conference Principles of Information Governance. After analysing and reformulating the principles into control standards, and they are investigated and interpreted in terms of practicing information governance.
Keywords
Information governance; Corporate records management; RIM; Litigation; E-discovery; Sedona Conference; Principles of Information Governance; GARP;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cohasset Associates, Arma International, Aiim. 2014. 2013-2014 Information Governance Benchmarking Survey: Survey White Paper. [인용 2015. 4. 25].
2 EDRM. 2012. Information Governance Reference Model(IGRM). v3.0. [인용 2015. 10. 6].
3 EDRM. 2014. Electronic Discovery Reference Model. v.3.0 [인용 2015. 10. 6].
4 Forrester Research 2012. Information Archiving and Governance Online Survey, June 2012. [인용 2015. 4. 25].
5 Hagmann, Juerg. 2013. "Information Governance - Beyond the Buzz." Records Management Journal, 23(3) : 228-240.   DOI
6 Harris, Sherry B. and Paul H. McVoy. ed. 2014. The Sedona Conference Glossary: E-Discovery & Digital Information Management, Fourth Edition. [인용 2015. 11. 6].
7 Kahn Consulting, Inc. 2013. Information Governance : How IG helps you meet corporate responsibilities.
8 Lomas, Elizabeth. 2010. "Information Governance: Information Security and Access within a UK Context." Records Management Journal, 20(2): 182-198.   DOI
9 RSD. 2013a. The Ultimate Information Governance Dictionary and Vocabulary Guide. [인용 2015. 10. 6].
10 RSD. 2013b. "PSA Peugeot Citroen chooses RSD GLASS(R) for Information Governance" [인용 2015. 5. 30].
11 RSD. 2014. Defining Information Governance Policies. [인용 2015. 10. 6].
12 Silic, Mario and Andrea Back. 2013. "Factors Impacting Information Governance in the Mobile Device Dual-Use Context." Records Management Journal, 23(2): 73-89.   DOI
13 Smallwood, Robert F. 2014. Information Governance: Concepts, Strategies and Best Practices. Hoboken(NJ): Wiley(Wiley CIO series).
14 The Sedona Conference. 2014. "The Sedona Conference Commentary on Information Governance." The Sedona Conference Journal. 15(Fall 2014): 125-170.
15 The Sedona Conference 2015a. About The Sedona Conference. [인용 2015. 10. 6].
16 The Sedona Conference 2015b. The Sedona Conference(R) Working Group Series SM. [인용 2015. 10. 6].
17 Wiler, Vicki. 2014. "Making the Leap to an Information Governance Role." Information Management Journal, January/February 2014: 38-40.
18 고선미. 2003. 포스코 보존기록물 관리에 대한 연구. 기록학연구, 8: 96-136.(Ko, Sunme. 2003. "The Study of the Business Archives Management in POSCO." The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 8: 96-136.)
19 김도훈. 2009. 미국 전자증거개시절차상 면책특권이 인정되는 자료의 부주의한 공개에 관한 연구. 법조, 58(3): 169-201.(Kim, Do Hoon. 2009. "A Study on Inadvertent Production of Privileged Materials in the U.S. e-Discovery." Bup-Jo, 58(3): 169-201.)
20 김도훈. 2014. 미국 전자증거개시절차상 증거검색 및 수집방법에 관한 연구 : 기술지원 검토를 중심으로. 강원법학(강원대학교 비교법학연구소), 41(I): 217-252.(Kim, Do Hoon. 2014. "A Study on the Search and Information Retrieval Methods in the U.S. E-discovery : Focusing on the Technology-Assisted Review." Kangwon Law Review, 41(I): 217-252.)
21 김종호. 2010. 전자소송시스템 하에서 전자적으로 저장된 정보에 대한 증거현출 및 조사방법 : 미국의 입법례와 세도나 원칙을 중심으로. 법학연구(부산대학교 법학연구소), 51(4): 245-279.(Kim, Jongho. 2010. "Evidence Production and Discovery Methodology against Electronically Stored Information under the Electronic Litigation System : Focusing on the Changes of U.S. Legislature and Sedona Principles." Law Review(School of Law & Institute of Law Studies, Pusan National University), 51(4): 245-279.)
22 김종호. 2015. 세도나 캐나다 원칙상 전자증거개시제도의 준비에 관한 실무상의 문제점. 법학연구(한국법학회), 59: 147-183,(Kim Jongho. 2015. "Some Practical Issues in the Preparing for E-Discovery under the Sedona Canada Principles Addressing Electronic Discovery." Law Review (Korean Law Association), 59: 147-183.)
23 김화경. 2007. 기업사료의 수집.평가방안 연구 : 메리츠화재의 사례를 중심으로. 기록학연구, 15: 219-262.(Kim, Hwa Kyoung. 2007. "A Case Study of a Acquisition & Appraisal Policy of Business Archives : With a Focus on Meritz." The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 15: 219-262.)
24 박용부, 김태수. 2011. 건설기록물 분류체계 모형에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(3): 83-101.(Park, Yong-Boo and Taesoo Kim. 2011. "A Study on the Model for Construction Records Classification System." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(3): 83-101.)   DOI
25 이진영. 1999. 기업정보관리와 정보서비스체계의 개선방향. 한국비블리아학회지, 10: 137-161.(Lee, Jin-Young. 1999. Improvement Directions in Businiss Information and Information Service System. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 10: 137-161.)
26 장완규. 2015. 기업전자기록의 증거력 확보전략과 미국 e-Discovery제도의 시사점. 기록인, 32: 34-39.(Jang, Wan-Kyu. 2015. "Preserving Evidential Value of Corporate Electronic Records and Implications of the U.S. e-Discovery." Kirokin, 32: 34-39.)
27 정기애. 2015. IT기반의 전자기록관리의 거버넌스 전략. 기록인, 32: 10-17.(Jeong, Ki-Ae. 2015. "IT-based Strategies for Electronic Records Governance." Kirokin, 32: 10-17.)
28 조동근. 2015. "기업인에게 교도소 담장을 걷게 한 사회." 자유경제원. 2015.8.7. [인용 2015. 11. 15]
29 Altepeter, Andrew. 2015. "Designing a Records Audit: A Controls-Based Approach." Information Management Journal, March/April 2015: 20-23.
30 ARC Document Solutions. 2014. Document Retention Governance for the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Industry, 2014.
31 ARMA. 2009. The Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles(GARP), [인용 2015. 10. 5]
32 ARMA International. 2015a. Information Governance Professional. [인용 2015. 11. 5].
33 ARMA International. 2015b. Information Governance Professional. Competency Domain. [인용 2015. 11. 5].
34 ARMA International. 2015c. Information Governance DACUM Chart. [인용 2015. 11. 5].