Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.201412.409

The Economic Feasibility Analysis of Busan Central Library Construction - For the Four Candidate Sites -  

Kang, Hee-Kyung (부산대학교 경제통상연구원)
Chang, Durk-Hyun (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
Lee, Soo-Sang (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / v.45, no.4, 2014 , pp. 409-428 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the economic feasibility of Busan Regional Central Library. The four candidate sites were included for the analysis. To achieve the purpose of this study, we applied three types of indices such as Benefit-Cost analysis, Net Present Value, and Internal Rate of Return. We used CVM(Contingent Valuation Method) to calculate the benefit; we conducted two investigations to calculate WTP, which are for pretest and for main survey. From results of pretest, we designed five optimal prices. On the basis of them, main survey was accomplished to figure out WTPs for four candidate sites. The results show that four candidate sites were all feasible from an economic point of view. Of these, the Busan Citizen Park site got the highest point of B/C ratio.
Keywords
Economic feasibility; Regional central library; Benefit/cost analysis; Contingent valuation method; Willingness to pay;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 고영만 외. 2009. 공공도서관의 경제적 가치 측정 연구. 서울: 문화체육관광부. (Ko, Young-Man et al. 2009. Studying the Economic Value of Korean Public Libraries. Seoul: Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.)
2 국가통계포털 홈페이지 (Korean Statistical Information Service Homepage. 2014. )
3 김홍배. 2012. 정책평가기법(비용편익분석론). 서울: 나남. (Kim, Hong-Bae. 2012. Public Policy Analysis and Evaluation Method : a Cost-benefit Analysis. Seoul: Nanam.)
4 박용치. 2005. 평균 지불의사액의 차이와 측정. 한국사회와 행정연구. 15(4): 251-273. (Park, Yong-Chie. 2005. Measuring the Difference in Mean WTP: Ordering Effects When CV Response Are Not Independent. Korean Society and Public Administration. 15(4): 251-273.)
5 장덕현 외. 2014. 지역대표도서관 건립 계획에 관한 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지. 45(3): 119-139. (Chang, Duk-Hyun et al. 2014. "New Main Library Project in a Metropolitan City: with a Reference to the Library of Busan". Korean Library and Information Science Society. 45(3): 119-139.)
6 정혜경, 정은주. 2007. 공공도서관의 가치평가를 위한 가상가치평가법 분석. 정보관리학회지. 24(1): 187-208. (Jung, Hye-Kyung and Jung, Eun-ju. 2007. "An Analysis of the Contingent Valuation Method to Measure the Economic Value of Public Libraries." Journal of Korean Society for Information Management. 24(1): 187-208.)
7 표순희. 2012. 조건부가치측정법(Contingent Valuation Methods)을 적용한 공공도서관 가치의 비교연구. 정보관리학회지. 29(2): 173-191. (Pyo, Soon-Hee. 2012. The Comparative Study of Public Library Valuation Using CVM: Case of the Payment Vehicles. Journal of Korean Society for Information Management. 29(2): 173-191.)
8 한국개발연구원. 2008. 예비타당성 조사 수행을 위한 일반지침 수정.보완연구(제5판). 서울: 동연구원, 2008-12.
9 Aabo, Svanhild. 2005. "Are Public Libraries Worth their Price?: A Contingent Valuation Study of Norweigian Pulic Libraries." New Library World, 106(11/12): 487-95.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Hanemann, W. Michael, and Barbara Kanninen. 1996. "The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response CV data. California Agricultural Experiment Station." Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics. Working Paper 798.
11 Holt, Glen E., Donald Elliott, and Amonia Moore. 1999. "Placing a Value on Public Library Services." Public Libraries-Chicago-Public Library Association, 38(1999): 98-109.
12 Mitchell, R. Cameron. and Richard, T. Carson. 1993. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Watshington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
13 Powe, Neil A., and Ian J. Bateman. 2003. "Ordering Effects in Nested 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' Contingent Valuation Designs." Ecological Economics, 45(2): 255-270.   DOI   ScienceOn