Browse > Article

A Study on Quality Evaluation of Discovery Central Index - the Case of EDS(EDSCO Discovery Service) -  

Lee, Eun-Ju (경일대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / v.45, no.3, 2014 , pp. 415-440 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study intends to make a comprehensive inquiry into the meaning and limitations of Discovery, and to explore how to make full use of Discovery in library cataloging. To this end, first discussed is the meaning of Discovery, which has a variety definitions. For the quality evaluation, 5 criteria were developed on the basis of literature review. Then this study conducted the quality evaluation on the basis of previously developed 5 criteria and usefulness of Discovery in library catalogs is thoroughly discussed. Based on these, the final discussion includes strategies for Korean LIS scholars and library practitioners to consider when applying Discovery as an integrated search tool.
Keywords
Discovery; Central index; Quality evaluation; EDS(EBSCO Discovery Service);
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 남영준, 양지안. 2010. 대학도서관 이용자의 메타서치시스템 이용행태 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(3): 307-323.(Nam, Young-Joon and Yang, Ji-Ann. 2010. "A Study on User Information Seeking Behavior of Metasearch System in the Academic Library." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3): 307-323.)
2 구중억, 곽승진. 2007. 차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2): 61-88.(Gu, Jung-Eok and Kwak. Seung-Jin. 2007. "A Study on Next Generation OPAC's Interface and Function." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 18(2): 61-88.)
3 김예린, 정영미. 2011. 대학도서관의 차세대 OPAC 체크리스트 개발. 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집. 2011년 8월 26일. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원, 53-58(Kim, Ye-Rin and Jung, Young-Mi. 2011a. "The development of Evaluation Checklist for Next generation OPAC of University Library." Proceedings of the Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 53-58.)
4 김왕종. 2004. 통합정보시스템의 품질평가. 석사학위논문, 부산대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과.(Kim, Wang-Jong. 2004. Quality Evaluation on Integrated Information Systems. M. A. thesis. Pusan National University.)
5 도태현, 정영미. 2013. 대학도서관의 차세대 OPAC 기능 채택과 확산 현황. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 44(2): 197-215.(Doh, Tae-Hyun and Jung, Young-Mi. 2013. "A Study on the Next Generation OPAC Functionalities Diffusion Status and Adoption by Academic Libraries." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2): 197-215.)
6 심경. 2008a. 차세대 도서관 목록. 도서관문화, 49(9): 22-28.(Shim, Kyung. 2008a. "Next Generation Library Catalog." KLA Journal, 49(9): 22-28.)
7 심경. 2008b. 통합검색시스템. 도서관문화, 49(12): 31-38.(Shim, Kyung. 2008b. "Federated Searching." KLA Journal, 49(12): 31-38.)
8 윤정옥. 2010. 차세대 도서관 목록 사례의 고찰. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 41(1): 5-28.(Yoon, Cheong-Ok. 2010. "A Case Study on the Next Generation Library Catalogs." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(1): 5-28.)
9 윤정옥. 2013. 차세대 도서관 목록의 제반 기능에 관한 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(4): 5-23.(Yoon, Cheong-Ok. 2013. "An Analysis on the Functions of the Next Generation Library Catalog: With a Focus on SearchWorks." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(4): 5-23.)
10 이제환. 2002. 공동목록 DB의 품질평가와 품질관리: KERIS의 종합목록 DB를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 36(1): 61-89.(Lee, Jae-Whoan. 2002. Quality Evaluation and Management of a Shared Cataloging DB: the Case of KERIS UNICAT DB. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 36(1): 61-89.)
11 조종민. 2011. 차세대 전자자료 통합검색 솔루션(discovery solution) 도입 검토 사례연구. 사대도협회지, 12: 41-57.
12 최성진, 김태수. 2010. 연구도서관 디스커버리 환경에서의 MARC의 역할 연구. 지식처리연구, 11(1/2): 33-47.(Choi, Sung-Jin and Kim, Tae-Soo. 2010. A Study on the MARC's Role of Discovery Environment in the Library. Journal of Knowledge Processing and Management, 11(1/2): 33-47.)
13 홍현진. 2005. 웹 기반 데이터베이스의 품질평가 기준 개발에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 39(2): 211-235.(Hong, Hyun-Jin. 2005. "A Study on the Development of the Quality Evaluation Standard of Web-Based Databases." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(2): 211-235.)
14 Babu, Preedip Balaji and M. Krishnamurthy. 2013. "Library Automation to Resource Discovery: a Review of Emerging Challenges." The Electronic Library, 31(4): 433-451.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Chickering, F. William and Sharon Q. Yang. 2014. "Evaluation and Comparison of Discovery Tools: An Update." Information Technology and Libraries, 33(2): 5-30.
16 Breeding, Marshall. 2007. "Thinking about your next OPAC." Computers in Libraries, 27(4): 28-30.
17 Delone, William H. and McLean, E. R. 2004. "Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model." International Journal of Electronic Comerce, 9(1): 31-47.
18 Breeding, Marshall. 2010. "The State of the Art in Library Discovery 2010." Computers in Libraries, 30(1): 31-34.
19 Clarke, Eddie. 2006. Resource Discovery Tools Guide and Evaluation. [cited 2014. 7. 28].
20 DeFelice, Barbara et al. 2009. An Evaluation of Serials Solutions Summon As a Discovery Service for the Dartmouth College Library. Dartmouth College Library.
21 Emanuel, Jenny and Guest Columnist. 2009. "Next Generation Catalogs : What do They do and Why Should We Care?" Reference & User Services Quarterly, 49(2): 117-120.   DOI
22 Fagan, Jody Condit et al. 2012. "Usability Test Results for a Discovery Tool in an Academic Library." Information technology and libraries, 31(1): 83-112.
23 Foster, Anita K. and Jean B. MacDonald, 2013. "ATale of Two Discoveries : Comparing the usability of Summon and EBSCO Discovery Service." Journal of Web Lirarianship, 7(1): 1-19.   DOI
24 Granick, Lois. 1991. "Assuring the Quality of Information Dissemination." Information Services and Use, 11(3): 117-136.
25 Grophy, Jan and David Bawden. 2005. "Is Google enough? Comparison of an Internet Search Engine with Academic Library Resources." Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 57(6): 498-512.
26 Nagy, Andrew. 2009. "A Conversation With Karen Schneider: VuFind and Summon." [cited 2014. 7. 20].
27 NISO ODI Working Group. ODI Survey Report: Reflections and Perspectives on Discovery Services. [cited 2014. 7. 17].
28 OCLC. 2005. Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
29 OCLC. 2010. Perceptions of Libraries, 2010: Context and Community. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
30 Vaughan, Jason. 2011. "Web Scale Discovery: What and Why?" Library Technology Reports, 47(1): 5-11.
31 Philip, Martin. 2010. Do Students Wants a One-stop-shop to Help Them Navigate Their Way Around the Maze of Library Resources? M. A. thesis. The university of sheffield.
32 Pradhan, Dinesh R., Kruti Trivedi and Jagdish Arora. 2011. "Searching Online Resources in New Discovery Environment: A state-of-the-Art review." Proceedings of the 8th International Caliber, 132-145.
33 Vaughan, Jason. 2012. "Investigations into Library Web Scale Discovery Service", Information Technology & Libraries, 31(1): 32-82.   DOI
34 Way, Dong. 2010. "The Impact of Web-scale Discovery on the Use of a Library Collection." Serials Review, 36(4): 214-220.   DOI
35 Williams, Sarah C. and Anita K. Foster. 2011. "Promise Fulfilled? An EBSCO Discovery Service Usability Study." Journal of Web Librarianship, 5(3): 179-198.   DOI
36 Yang, Sharon Q. and Kurt Wagner. 2010. "Evaluating and Comparing Discovery Tools: How Close are We Towards Next Generation Catalog?" Library Hi Tech, 28(4): 690-709.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Yang, Sharon Q. and Melissa A. Hofmann. 2010. "Evaluating and Comparing Discovery Tools: How Close AreWe Towards Next Generation Catalog?" Library Hi Tech, 28(4): 690-709.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 A도서관 디스커버리 업무담당 사서. 2014. 7. 28, 부산, [인터뷰].