Browse > Article

Factors Affecting the Difference between the Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentrations Measured Directly and Calculated Using the Friedewald Formula  

Min, Won-Ki (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Park, Hae-Il (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kangnam St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Jun, Kyung-Ran (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Chun, Sa-Il (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Lee, Woo-Chang (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance / v.30, no.2, 2008 , pp. 233-235 More about this Journal
Abstract
National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) is the guideline for detection evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. The risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) is assessed by the presence of CHD risk equivalents and the number of risk factors. LDL-cholesterol is the goal of treatment for hyperlipidemia. Contents:The most common approach for determining LDL-cholesterol level in clinical laboratory is to calculate it based on Friedewald formula. For accurate risk assessment by the calculated LDL-cholesterol, good analytical performances of total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride are prerequisite. Even if the analytical performance of these three analytes are within the acceptable criteria, pooled imprecision and bias of the calculated LDL-cholesterol could not meet the criteria for LDL-cholesterol. Even under conditions satisfying the requirements of Friedewald formula, the calculated LDL-cholesterol level was lower than the directly measured level and the difference was dependent on the level of triglyceride, LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol. When evaluatingpatients with hyperlipidemia, Friedewald calculation may underestimate the risk for coronary heart disease which may lead to inappropriate treatment option.
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 College of American Pathologists. http://www.cap.org
2 Scharnagl H, Nauck M, Wieland H, Marz W. The Friedewald formula underestimates LDL cholesterol at low concentrations. Clin Chem Lab Med 2001;39:426-31   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Li KM, Wilcken DE, Dudman NP. Effect of serum lipoprotein(a) on estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by the Friedewald formula. Clin Chem 1994;40:571-3
4 허미나, 김창수, 박민정, 곽인숙, 이규만. 균질법에 의한 저밀도 지단백콜레스테롤의 측정 및 Friedewald 계산법과 의 비교. 대한진단검사의학회지 2003;23:104-8
5 Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486-97   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Tremblay AJ, Morrissette H, Gagne JM, Bergeron J, GagneC, Couture P. Validation of the Friedewald formula for the determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with beta-quantification in a large population. Clin Biochem 2004;37:785-90   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network (CRMLN). http://www.cdc.gov/labstandards/crmln.htm
8 Nauck M, Warnick GR, Rifai N. Methods for measurement of LDL-cholesterol: a critical assessment of direct measurement by homogeneous assays versus calculation. Clin Chem 2002;48:236-54
9 Ran Jun K, Park HI, Chun S, Park H, Min WK. Effects of total cholesterol and triglyceride on the percentage difference between the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration measured directly and calculated using the Friedewald formula. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:371-5   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Tighe DA, Ockene IS, Reed G, Nicolosi R. Calculated low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels frequently underestimate directly measured low density lipoprotein cholesterol determinations in patients with serum triglyceride levels < or =4.52 mmol/l: an analysis comparing the LipiDirect magnetic LDL assay with the Friedewald calculation. Clin Chim 2006;365:236-42   DOI   ScienceOn
11 McNamara JR, Cohn JS, Wilson PW, Schaefer EJ. Calculated values for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the assessment of lipid abnormalities and coronary disease risk. Clin Chem 1990;36:36-42
12 Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499-502
13 Bachorik PS and Ross JW. National Cholesterol Education Program recommendations for measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: executive summary. The National Cholesterol Education Program Working Group on Lipoprotein Measurement. Clin Chem 1995;41:1414-20
14 Hilbert T and Lifshitz MS. Lipids and dyslipoproteinemia. In: McPherson RA and Pincus MR, eds. Henry's clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods. 21st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2007:200-18