Browse > Article

Clinical Manifestations and Microbiological Features Correlating with Central Venous Catheter Related Infection  

Mun, Sung-Uk (Department of Surgery, Dongguk University College of Medicine)
Jeon, Hyeong-Jin (Department of Surgery, Dongguk University College of Medicine)
Ha, Dong-Yeop (Department of Surgery, Dongguk University College of Medicine)
Chung, Byung-Ook (Department of Surgery, Dongguk University College of Medicine)
Jung, Ho-Geun (Department of Surgery, Dongguk University College of Medicine)
Ahn, Woo-Sup (Department of Surgery, Dongguk University College of Medicine)
Ha, Gyoung-Yim (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine)
Bae, Jong-Dae (Daegu Armed Forces Hospital)
Kang, Seon-Hui (Department of Surgery, Keimyung University College of Medicine)
Jung, Ki-Hoon (Department of Surgery, Dongguk University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research / v.72, no.5, 2007 , pp. 403-408 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Central venous catheterization is widely used to supply substantial amounts of fluids, total parenteral nutrition and hemodialysis in renal failure patients, as well as for measuring the central venous pressure. The most common complications encountered during central venous catheterization include catheter-related infections and subsequent sepsis. Therefore, when fever exists in patients with a central venous catheter, an immediate blood culture should be performed, and if the fever persists, an infection must be suspected and the catheter immediately removed; a culture of the catheter tip should also be performed. To date, no definite clinical details relating to this matter have been reported. Methods: Between December 2002 and March 2005, a retrospective study was undertaken using the medical records of 85 patients. In those patients where a fever lasted for more than 8 hours, or when catheterization was no longer needed, the catheter tip cultures were sent to the microbiology laboratory. Blood cultures were also performed on 49 patients with a fever. The Chi-square method using the PC SPSS program, with P value less than 0.05 as statically significant. Results: Of the 85 patients where the catheters were removed, significant microorganisms were detected 20 of the 49 with a fever. Only 5 of the remaining 36 patients had their catheters spontaneously removed. Moreover, 14 of the 20 patients with significant microorganisms were found to have kept their catheter in place for more than 14 days. Of the 49 patients with a fever, in who blood cultures were undertaken, 13 showed specific microorganisms, with 6 of these showing the same results for both their blood and catheter tip cultures, which enabled the definite diagnosis of the catheter-related infection and underlying sepsis. Various microorganisms were detected from the catheter tip cultures, including Staphylococcus species the CNS, with S. aureus being the most common, at 61.6%. Conclusion: A central venous catheter should be removed immediately when an infection is suspected, but early broad-spectrum antibiotics therapy should be commenced due to the time required to obtain the culture results. Moreover, even if a fever does not exist in patients with a catheter inserted for more than 14 days, infection and sepsis from the catheter should be of concern, with a more cautious approach being mandatory. (J Korean Surg Soc 2007;72: 403-408)
Keywords
Central venous catheter; Catheter-related infection; Sepsis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Dillon JD, Schaffner W, Van Way III CW, Meng HC. Septicemia and total parenteral nutrition. JAMA 1973;223:1341-4   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Seldinger SL. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography. Acta Radiol 1953;39:368-76   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Rowley S, Downing R. Breast 'abscess': an unusual complication of catheterisation of the subclavian vein. Br J Radiol 1987;60:773-4   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Peters JL, Armstrong R. Air embolism occurring as a complication of central venous catheterization. Ann Surg 1987;187:375-8   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Benter T, Teichgraber UKM, Kluhs L, Dorken B. Percutaneous central venous catheterization with a lethal complication. Intensive Care Med 1999;25:1180-2   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Bently DW, Lepper MH. Septicemia related to indwelling venous catheter. JAMA 1968;206:1749-52   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Yoon WH, Ha WS, Park ST, Choi SK, Hong SC, Han HS. A clinical review of central venous catheterization. J Korean Surg Soc 1992;43:725-31
8 Collins RN, Braun PA. Risk of local and systemic infection with polyethylene intravenous catheters. A prospective study of 213 catheterization. N Engl J Med 1968;279:340-3   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bernard RW, Stahl WM, Chase Jr RM. Subclavian vein catheterization: a prospective study. II. Infectious complications. Ann Surg 1971;173:191-200   DOI   ScienceOn
10 David A, Risitano DC, Mazzeo G, Sinardi L, Venuti FS, Sinardi AU. Central venous catheters and infections. Minerva Anestesiol 2005;71:561-4
11 Thoburn R, Fekety FR, Cluff LE, Melvin VB. Infections acquired by hospitalized patients. Arch Int Med 1968;121:1-10   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Keeri-Szanto M. The subclavian vein, a constant and convenient intravenous injection site. Arch Surg 1956;72:179-81   DOI
13 Aubaniac R. L'injection intraveineuse sousclaviculaire. Advantages et techniques. Press Med 1952;60:1456
14 Polderman KH, Girbes AR. Central venous catheter use. Part 2: infectious complications. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:18-28   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Ryan Jr JA, Abel RM. Catheter complications of total parenteral nutrition. N Engl J Med 1974;290:757-61   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Habash M, Reid G. Microbial biofilms: their development and significance for medical device-related infection. J Clin Phamacol 1999;39:887-98
17 Durskin MS, Siegel PD. Bacterial contamination of indwelling intravenous polyethylene catheters. JAMA 1963;185:966-8   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Smits H, Freedman LR. Prolonged venous catheterization as a cause of sepsis. N Engl J Med 1967;276:1229-33   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Krauss D, Schmidt GA. Cardiac tamponade and contralateral hemothorax after subclavian vein catheterization. Chest 1991;99:517-8   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Kang JS, Kim HJ. A clinical review of percutaneous catheterization of subclavian vein. J Korean Surg Soc 1979;21:35-9
21 Moran JM, Atwood RP, Rowe NI. Clinical and bacteriologic study of infection associated with venous cutdowns. N Engl J Med 1965;272:554-60   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Estrada V, Gutierrez FM, Cortes M. Budd-Chiari syndrome as a complication of the catheterization of the subclavian vein (letter). Am J Gastroenterol 1991;86:250-1
23 Stuart RK, Shikora SA, Akerman P. Incidence of arrhythmia with central venous catheter insertion and exchange. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1990;14:152-5   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Smith BE, Model TH. Complication of subclavian vein catheterization. Arch Surg 1965;90:228-9   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Bernard RW, Stahl WM. Subclavian vein catheterizations: a prospective study. Ann Surg 1971;173:184-200   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Watnick P, Kolter R. Biofilm. City of microbes. J Bacteriol 2000;182:2675-9   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Ratcliffe FM. Suppurative thrombosis of the superior vena cava: a lethal complication of central venous catheters. Intensive Care Med 1985;11:265-6
28 Oborin AN, Novak VL. Pneumomediastinum as a complication of subclavian vein puncture. Vrach Delo 1990;2:91
29 Shawn JP, Traves DC, Thomas GG, Timothy LP, Robert GS. Bacteremia associated with central venous catheter. infection is not an independent predictor of outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:671-80   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Hernandez D, Diaz F, Suria S, Machado M, Lorenzo V, Losada M, et al. Subclavian catheter-related infection is a major risk factor for the late development of subclavian vein stenosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1993;8:227-30