Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12750/JARB.37.2.113

Development of a new mini straw for cryopreservation of boar semen  

Almubarak, Areeg (Department of Theriogenology and Reproductive Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University)
Osman, Rana (Department of Theriogenology and Reproductive Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University)
Lee, Seongju (Department of Theriogenology and Reproductive Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University)
Yu, Iljeoung (Department of Theriogenology and Reproductive Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University)
Jeon, Yubyeol (Department of Theriogenology and Reproductive Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology / v.37, no.2, 2022 , pp. 113-120 More about this Journal
Abstract
Sperm cryopreservation is a fundamental process for the long-term conservation of livestock genetic resources. Yet, the packaging method has been shown, among other factors, to affect the frozen-thawed (FT) sperm quality. This study aimed to develop a new mini-straw for sperm cryopreservation. In addition, the kinematic patterns, viability, acrosome integrity, and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) of boar spermatozoa frozen in the developed 0.25 mL straw, 0.25 mL (minitube, Germany), or 0.5 mL (IMV technologies, France) straws were assessed. Post-thaw kinematic parameters were not different (experiment 1: total motility (33.89%, 32.42%), progressive motility (19.13%, 19.09%), curvilinear velocity (42.32, 42.86), and average path velocity (33.40, 33.62) for minitube and the developed straws, respectively. Further, the viability (38.56%, 34.03%), acrosome integrity (53.38%, 48.88%), MMP (42.32%, 36.71%) of spermatozoa frozen using both straw were not differ statistically (p > 0.05). In experiment two, the quality parameters for semen frozen in the developed straw were compared with the 0.5 mL IMV straw. The total motility (41.26%, 39.1%), progressive motility (24.62%, 23.25%), curvilinear velocity (46.44, 48.25), and average path velocity (37.98, 39.12), respectively, for IMV and the developed straw, did not differ statistically. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the viability (39.60%, 33.17%), acrosome integrity (46.23%, 43.23%), and MMP (39.66, 32.51) for IMV and the developed straw, respectively. These results validate the safety and efficiency of the developed straw and highlight its great potential for clinical application. Moreover, both 0.25 mL and 0.5 mL straws fit the present protocol for cryopreservation of boar spermatozoa.
Keywords
boar; cryoinjury; freezing-thawing; mini-straw; semen packaging;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Khan IM, Cao Z, Liu H, Khan A, Rahman SU, Khan MZ, Sathanawongs A, Zhang Y. 2021. Impact of cryopreservation on spermatozoa freeze-thawed traits and relevance OMICS to assess sperm cryo-tolerance in farm animals. Front. Vet. Sci. 8:609180.   DOI
2 Sharma R, Kattoor AJ, Ghulmiyyah J, Agarwal A. 2015. Effect of sperm storage and selection techniques on sperm parameters. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 61:1-12.   DOI
3 Nordstoga AB, Soderquist L, Adnoy T, Paulenz H. 2009. Effect of different packages and freezing/thawing protocols on fertility of ram semen. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 44:527-531.   DOI
4 Johnson MS, Senger PL, Allen CH, Hancock DD, Alexander BM, Sasser RG. 1995. Fertility of bull semen packaged in .25- and .5-milliliter french straws. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1914-1919.   DOI
5 Jovicic M, Chmelikova E, Sedmikova M. 2020. Cryopreservation of boar semen. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 65:115-123.   DOI
6 Jun-Feng G, Xiao-Feng Z, Li-Jun G, Qing L, Rong R. 2008. Cryopreservation of boar semen using straws. Chin. J. Agric. Biotechol. 5:231-236.   DOI
7 Kaneko R, Kakinuma T, Sato S, Jinno-Oue A. 2021. Improvement of short straws for sperm cryopreservation: installing an air-permeable filter facilitates handling. J. Reprod. Dev. 67:235-239.   DOI
8 Kumar A, Prasad JK, Srivastava N, Ghosh SK. 2019. Strategies to minimize various stress-related freeze-thaw damages during conventional cryopreservation of mammalian spermatozoa. Biopreserv. Biobank. 17:603-612.   DOI
9 Kang SS, Kim UH, Lee MS, Lee SD, Cho SR. 2020. Spermatozoa motility, viability, acrosome integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential and plasma membrane integrity in 0.25 mL and 0.5 mL straw after frozen-thawing in Hanwoo bull. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 35:307-314.   DOI
10 Karan P, Mohanty TK, Kumaresan A, Bhakat M, Baithalu RK, Verma K, Kumar S, Das Gupta M, Saraf KK, Gahlot SC. 2018. Improvement in sperm functional competence through modified low-dose packaging in French mini straws of bull semen. Andrologia 50:e13003.   DOI
11 Yu I and Leibo SP. 2002. Recovery of motile, membrane-intact spermatozoa from canine epididymides stored for 8 days at 4 degrees C. Theriogenology 57:1179-1190.   DOI
12 Lone SA, Mohanty TK, Bhakat M, Paray AR, Yadav HP, Singh A, Sinha R, Baithalu RK, Rahim A, Kumar R, Kumar P, Shah N. 2020. Modification of French mini-straw plug position for cryopreservation of small doses of bull sperm. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 218:106485.   DOI
13 Najafi A, Taheri RA, Mehdipour M, Farnoosh G, Martinez-Pastor F. 2018. Lycopene-loaded nanoliposomes improve the performance of a modified Beltsville extender broiler breeder roosters. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 195:168-175.   DOI
14 Raj A, Mukherjee AA, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Srivastava SK. 2022. Supply chain management during and post-COVID-19 pandemic: mitigation strategies and practical lessons learned. J. Bus. Res. 142:1125-1139.   DOI
15 Sancho S, Casas I, Ekwall H, Saravia F, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Rodriguez-Gil JE, Flores E, Pinart E, Briz M, Garcia-Gil N, Bassols J, Pruneda A, Bussalleu E, Yeste M, Bonet S. 2007. Effects of cryopreservation on semen quality and the expression of sperm membrane hexose transporters in the spermatozoa of Iberian pigs. Reproduction 134:111-121.   DOI
16 Johnson LA, Weitze KF, Fiser P, Maxwell WMC. 2000. Storage of boar semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 62:143-172.   DOI
17 Nothling JO and Shuttleworth R. 2005. The effect of straw size, freezing rate and thawing rate upon post-thaw quality of dog semen. Theriogenology 63:1469-1480.   DOI
18 Ravagnani GM, Torres MA, Leal DF, Martins SMMK, Papa FO, Dell'Aqua Junior JA, Alvarenga MA, Andrade AFC. 2018. Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 38:1726-1730.   DOI
19 Stuart CC, Vaughan JL, Kershaw CM, de Graaf SP, Bathgate R. 2019. Effect of diluent type, cryoprotectant concentration, storage method and freeze/thaw rates on the post-thaw quality and fertility of cryopreserved alpaca spermatozoa. Sci. Rep. 9:12826.   DOI
20 Tremoen NH, Gaustad AH, Andersen-Ranberg I, van Son M, Zeremichael TT, Frydenlund K, Grindflek E, Vage DI, Myromslien FD. 2018. Relationship between sperm motility characteristics and ATP concentrations, and association with fertility in two different pig breeds. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 193:226-234.   DOI
21 Buranaamnuay K, Tummaruk P, Singlor J, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Techakumphu M. 2009. Effects of straw volume and Equex-STM on boar sperm quality after cryopreservation. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 44:69-73.   DOI
22 Pesch S and Hoffmann B. 2007. Cryopreservation of spermatozoa in veterinary medicine. J. Reproduktionsmed. Endokrinol. 4:101-105.
23 Sutkeviciene N, Riskeviciene V, Januskauskas A, Zilinskas H, Andersson M. 2009. Assessment of sperm quality traits in relation to fertility in boar semen. Acta Vet. Scand. 51:53.   DOI
24 Okorie O, Subramoniam R, Charnley F, Patsavellas J, Widdifield D, Salonitis K. 2020. Manufacturing in the time of COVID-19: an assessment of barriers and enablers. IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 48:167-175.
25 Ozkavukcu S, Erdemli E, Isik A, Oztuna D, Karahuseyinoglu S. 2008. Effects of cryopreservation on sperm parameters and ultrastructural morphology of human spermatozoa. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 25:403-411.   DOI
26 Stevenson JS, Higgins JJ, Jung Y. 2009. Pregnancy outcome after insemination of frozen-thawed bovine semen packaged in two straw sizes: a meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 92:4432-4438.   DOI
27 Watson PF. 2000. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 60-61:481-492.   DOI
28 Diskin MG. 2018. Review: semen handling, time of insemination and insemination technique in cattle. Animal 12(s1): s75-s84.
29 Duplaix M and Sexton TJ. 1984. Effects of type of freeze straw and thaw temperature on the fertilizing capacity of frozen chicken semen. Poult. Sci. 63:775-780.   DOI
30 Grotter LG, Cattaneo L, Marini PE, Kjelland ME, Ferre LB. 2019. Recent advances in bovine sperm cryopreservation techniques with a focus on sperm post-thaw quality optimization. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 54:655-665.   DOI
31 Dias Maziero RR, Guasti PN, Monteiro GA, Avanzi BR, Hartwig FP, Lisboa FP, Martin I, Papa FO. 2013. Evaluation of sperm kinetics and plasma membrane integrity of frozen equine semen in different storage volumes and freezing conditions. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 33:165-168.   DOI
32 Paul SK and Chowdhury P. 2021. A production recovery plan in manufacturing supply chains for a high-demand item during COVID-19. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 51:104-125.   DOI
33 Flesch FM and Gadella BM. 2000. Dynamics of the mammalian sperm plasma membrane in the process of fertilization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1469:197-235.   DOI
34 Ansari MS, Rakha BA, Andrabi SM, Akhter S. 2011. Effect of straw size and thawing time on quality of cryopreserved buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) semen. Reprod. Biol. 11:49-54.   DOI
35 Buhr MM, Fiser P, Bailey JL, Curtis EF. 2001. Cryopreservation in different concentrations of glycerol alters boar sperm and their membranes. J. Androl. 22:961-969.   DOI
36 Park SH, Jeon Y, Yu IJ. 2017. Effects of antioxidants supplement in porcine sperm freezing on in vitro fertilization and the glutathione and reactive oxygen species level of presumptive zygotes. J. Emb. Trans. 32:337-342.   DOI
37 Park YJ and Pang MG. 2021. Mitochondrial functionality in male fertility: from spermatogenesis to fertilization. Antioxidants (Basel) 10:98.   DOI
38 Yeste M. 2015. Recent advances in boar sperm cryopreservation: state of the art and current perspectives. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 50 Suppl 2:71-79.   DOI
39 Zong Y, Sun Y, Li Y, Mehaisen GMK, Yuan J, Ma H, Ni A, Wang Y, Hamad SK, Elomda AM, Abbas AO, Chen J. 2022. Effect of glycerol concentration, glycerol removal method, and straw type on the quality and fertility of frozen chicken semen. Poult. Sci. 101:101840.   DOI
40 Choi SH, Lee MJ, Lee KM, Sa SJ, Kim HJ, Jin HJ, Song YS, Park JC. 2014. Effect of supplementation of trehalose, glycerol on conventional freezing and vitrification of boar sperm. J. Emb. Trans. 29:397-401.   DOI
41 Rath D, Bathgate R, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Roca J, Strzezek J, Waberski D. 2009. Recent advances in boar semen cryopreservation. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 66:51-66.
42 Rodriguez-Martinez H and Wallgren M. 2011. Advances in boar semen cryopreservation. Vet. Med. Int. 2011:396181.
43 Broekhuijse MLWJ, Sostaric E, Feitsma H, Gadella BM. 2012. Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility. J. Anim. Sci. 90:779-789.   DOI
44 Almubarak AM, Kim W, Abdelbagi NH, Balla SE, Yu IJ, Jeon Y. 2021. Washing solution and centrifugation affect kinematics of cryopreserved boar semen. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 36:65-75.   DOI
45 Amaral A, Lourenco B, Marques M, Ramalho-Santos J. 2013. Mitochondria functionality and sperm quality. Reproduction 146:R163-R174.   DOI
46 Athurupana R and Funahashi H. 2014. 63 Stepwise thawing preserves mitochondria membrane potential of boar spermatozoa extended in glycerol-free medium containing trehalose. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 27:124-125.   DOI