Washing solution and centrifugation affect kinematics of cryopreserved boar semen |
Almubarak, Areeg M.
(Department of Theriogenology and Reproductive Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-Safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University)
Kim, Woohyeon (Department of Theriogenology and Reproductive Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-Safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University) Abdelbagi, Nabeel H. (Department of Theriogenology and Reproductive Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-Safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University) Balla, Saddah E. (Department of Theriogenology and Reproductive Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-Safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University) Yu, Il-Jeoung (Department of Theriogenology and Reproductive Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-Safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University) Jeon, Yubyeol (Department of Theriogenology and Reproductive Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-Safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University) |
1 | Ciereszko A, Dietrich GJ, Nynca J, Dobosz S, Zalewski T. 2014. Cryopreservation of rainbow trout semen using a glucosemethanol extender. Aquaculture 420-421:275-281. DOI |
2 | DeJarnette JM, Marshall CE, Lenz RW, Monke DR, Ayars WH, Sattler CG. 2004. Sustaining the fertility of artificially inseminated dairy cattle: the role of the artificial insemination industry. J. Dairy Sci. 87 Suppl:E93-E104. DOI |
3 | Grossfeld R, Sieg B, Struckmann C, Frenzel A, Maxwell WM, Rath D. 2008. New aspects of boar semen freezing strategies. Theriogenology 70:1225-1233. DOI |
4 | Jain NK and Roy I. 2009. Effect of trehalose on protein structure. Protein Sci. 18:24-36. DOI |
5 | Carvajal G, Cuello C, Ruiz M, Vazquez JM, Martinez EA, Roca J. 2004. Effects of centrifugation before freezing on boar sperm cryosurvival. J. Androl. 25:389-396. DOI |
6 | Eriksson BM and Rodriguez-Martinez H. 2000. Effect of freezing and thawing rates on the post-thaw viability of boar spermatozoa frozen in FlatPacks and Maxi-straws. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 63:205-220. DOI |
7 | Foote RH. 2003. Fertility estimation: a review of past experience and future prospects. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 75:119-139. DOI |
8 | Hezavehei M, Sharafi M, Kouchesfahani HM, Henkel R, Agarwal A, Esmaeili V, Shahverdi A. 2018. Sperm cryopreservation: a review on current molecular cryobiology and advanced approaches. Reprod. Biomed. Online 37:327-339. DOI |
9 | Hussain N, Andrabi SMH , Mehmood MU. 2019. Effect of EDTA as chelating agent in extender on the post thaw quality of buffalo bull spermatozoa. Cryo Letters 40:159-163. |
10 | Jovicic M, Chmelikova E, Sedmikova M. 2020. Cryopreservation of boar semen. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 65:115-123. DOI |
11 | Knox RV. 2015. The fertility of frozen boar sperm when used for artificial insemination. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 50 Suppl 2:90-97. DOI |
12 | Luno V, Gil L, Olaciregui M, Gonzalez N, Jerez RA, de Blas I. 2014. Rosmarinic acid improves function and in vitro fertilising ability of boar sperm after cryopreservation. Cryobiology 69:157-162. DOI |
13 | Parrilla I, del Olmo D, Sijses L, Martinez-Alborcia MJ, Cuello C, Vazquez JM, Martinez EA, Roca J. 2012. Differences in the ability of spermatozoa from individual boar ejaculates to withstand different semen-processing techniques. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 132:66-73. DOI |
14 | Stuart CC, Vaughan JL, Kershaw CM, de Graaf SP, Bathgate R. 2019. Effect of diluent type, cryoprotectant concentration, storage method and freeze/thaw rates on the post-thaw quality and fertility of cryopreserved alpaca spermatozoa. Sci. Rep. 9:12826. DOI |
15 | Mandal R, Badyakar D, Chakrabarty J. 2014. Role of membrane lipid fatty acids in sperm cryopreservation. Adv. Androl. 2014:190542. |
16 | Martinez-Alborcia MJ, Morrell JM, Parrilla I, Barranco I, Vazquez JM, Martinez EA, Roca J. 2012. Improvement of boar sperm cryosurvival by using single-layer colloid centrifugation prior freezing. Theriogenology 78:1117-1125. DOI |
17 | Malo C, Gil L, Gonzalez N, Cano R, de Blas I, Espinosa E. 2010a. Comparing sugar type supplementation for cryopreservation of boar semen in egg yolk based extender. Cryobiology 61:17-21. DOI |
18 | Cordova A, Ducolomb Y, Jimenez I, Casas E, Bonilla E, Betancourt M. 1997. In vitro fertilizing capacity of frozen-thawed boar semen. Theriogenology 47:1309-1317. DOI |
19 | Yu I and Leibo SP. 2002. Recovery of motile, membrane-intact spermatozoa from canine epididymides stored for 8 days at 4 degrees C. Theriogenology 57:1179-1190. DOI |
20 | Chi HJ, Kim JH, Ryu CS, Lee JY, Park JS, Chung DY, Choi SY, Kim MH, Chun EK, Roh SI. 2008. Protective effect of antioxidant supplementation in sperm-preparation medium against oxidative stress in human spermatozoa. Hum. Reprod. 23:1023-1028. DOI |
21 | Lee EJ and Kim DY. 2017. Effects of curcumin from turmeric supplementation in freezing buffer on sperm motilities and reactive oxygen species generation. J. Emb. Trans. 32:249-255. DOI |
22 | Malo C, Gil L, Gonzalez N, Martinez F, Cano R, de Blas I, Espinosa E. 2010b. Anti-oxidant supplementation improves boar sperm characteristics and fertility after cryopreservation: comparison between cysteine and rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis). Cryobiology 61:142-147. DOI |
23 | Noguchi M, Yoshioka K, Hikono H, Suzuki C, Kikuchi K. 2015. Effect of semen extenders on frozen-thawed boar sperm characteristics and distribution in the female genital tract after deep intrauterine insemination in sows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 163:164-171. DOI |
24 | Park CH, Kim SW, Hwang YJ, Kim DY. 2012. Cryopreservation with trehalose reduced sperm chromatin damage in miniature pig. J. Emb. Trans. 27:107-111. |
25 | Park SH, Oh KB, Ock SA, Byun SJ, Lee HC, Kumar S, Lee SG, Woo JS. 2018. Effects of ice-binding protein from Leucosporidium on the cryopreservation of boar sperm*. J. Emb. Trans. 33:185-194. DOI |
26 | Rath D, Bathgate R, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Roca J, Strzezek J, Waberski D. 2009. Recent advances in boar semen cryopreservation. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 66:51-66. |
27 | Robles V, Valcarce DG, Riesco MF. 2019. The use of antifreeze proteins in the cryopreservation of gametes and embryos. Biomolecules 9:181. DOI |
28 | Rodriguez-Martinez H and Wallgren M. 2010. Advances in boar semen cryopreservation. Vet. Med. Int. 2010:396181. |
29 | Pezo F, Zambrano F, Uribe P, Risopatron J, Moya C, Cesar de Andrade AF, Burgos RA, Yeste M, Sanchez R. 2020. Oxidative and nitrosative stress in frozen-thawed pig spermatozoa. II: effect of the addition of saccharides to freezing medium on sperm function. Cryobiology 97:5-11. DOI |
30 | Shekarriz M, DeWire DM, Thomas AJ Jr, Agarwal A. 1995. A method of human semen centrifugation to minimize the iatrogenic sperm injuries caused by reactive oxygen species. Eur. Urol. 28:31-35. DOI |
31 | Watson PF. 2000. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 60-61:481-492. DOI |
32 | Yeste M. 2015. Recent advances in boar sperm cryopreservation: state of the art and current perspectives. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 50 Suppl 2:71-79. DOI |
33 | Yeste M, Rodriguez-Gil JE, Bonet S. 2017. Artificial insemination with frozen-thawed boar sperm. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 84:802-813. DOI |
34 | Yildiz C, Ottaviani P, Law N, Ayearst R, Liu L, McKerlie C. 2007. Effects of cryopreservation on sperm quality, nuclear DNA integrity, in vitro fertilization, and in vitro embryo development in the mouse. Reproduction 133:585-595. DOI |
35 | Blanch E, Tomas C, Hernandez M, Roca J, Martinez EA, Vazquez JM, Moce E. 2014. Egg yolk and glycerol requirements for freezing boar spermatozoa treated with methyl β-cyclodextrin or cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrin. J. Reprod. Dev. 60:143-149. DOI |
36 | Buranaamnuay K, Grossfeld R, Struckmann C, Rath D. 2011. Influence of cryoprotectants glycerol and amides, combined with antioxidants on quality of frozen-thawed boar sperm. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 127:56-61. DOI |
37 | Athurupana R, Takahashi D, Ioki S, Funahashi H. 2015. Trehalose in glycerol-free freezing extender enhances post-thaw survival of boar spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Dev. 61:205-210. DOI |
![]() |