Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.3.258

Effects of variation in the number and developmental stage of donor embryos and ovulation status of the surrogate mother on the efficiency of pig somatic cell cloning  

Park, Mi-Ryung (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Department of Agriculture)
Yoo, Jae Gyu (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Department of Agriculture)
Hur, Chang-Gi (CRONEX, Inc.)
Sim, Bo-Woong (National Primate Research Center & Futuristic Animal Resource & Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology)
Kim, Myunghoo (Department of Animal Science, College of Natural Science and Life Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute (RICRI), Pusan National University)
Seo, Jakyeom (Department of Animal Science, College of Natural Science and Life Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute (RICRI), Pusan National University)
Kim, Byeong-Woo (Department of Animal Science, College of Natural Science and Life Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute (RICRI), Pusan National University)
Cho, Byung-Wook (Department of Animal Science, College of Natural Science and Life Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute (RICRI), Pusan National University)
Shin, Teak-Soon (Department of Animal Science, College of Natural Science and Life Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute (RICRI), Pusan National University)
Cho, Seong-Keun (Department of Animal Science, College of Natural Science and Life Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute (RICRI), Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology / v.35, no.3, 2020 , pp. 258-264 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of variation in the number of somatic-cell-cloned embryos and their developmental stage at transfer on pregnancy, as well as the influence of the estrus status of recipient pigs on in vivo development of cloned porcine embryos after embryo transfer. For somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), fibroblast cells were obtained from a male porcine fetus. Recipient oocytes were collected from prepubertal gilts at a local abattoir and then cultured. After SCNT, reconstructed embryos of different numbers and developmental stages were transferred into recipient pigs. The developmental stage of the cloned embryos and the number of transferred embryos per surrogate showed no significant differences in terms of the resulting cloning efficiency. However, the pregnancy rate improved gradually as the number of transferred cloned embryos was increased from 100-150 or 151-200 to 201-300 per recipient. In pre-, peri-, and post-ovulation stages, pregnancy rates of 28.6%, 41.8%, and 67.6% and 16, 52, and 74 offspring were recorded, respectively. The number of cloned embryos and estrus status of the recipient pig at the time of transfer of the cloned embryo affect the efficiency of pig production; therefore, these variables should be particularly considered in order to increase the efficiency of somatic cell pig cloning.
Keywords
cloned embryo; embryo transfer; ovary; pig; recipient;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 King TJ, Dobrinsky JR, Zhu J, Finlayson HA, Bosma W, Harkness L, Ritchie WA, Travers A, McCorquodale C, Day BN, Dinnyes A, De Sousa PA, Wilmut I. 2002. Embryo development and establishment of pregnancy after embryo transfer in pigs: coping with limitations in the availability of viable embryos. Reproduction 123:507-515.   DOI
2 Koo OJ, Kang JT, Kwon DK, Park HJ, Lee BC. 2010. Influence of ovulation status, seasonality and embryo transfer method on development of cloned porcine embryos. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 45:773-778.   DOI
3 Kurome M, Ishikawa T, Tomii R, Ueno S, Shimada A, Yazawa H, Nagashima H. 2008. Production of transgenic and nontransgenic clones in miniature pigs by somatic cell nuclear transfer. J. Reprod. Dev. 54:156-163.   DOI
4 Li Z, Shi J, Liu D, Zhou R, Zeng H, Zhou X, Mai R, Zeng S, Luo L, Yu W, Zhang S, Wu Z. 2013. Effects of donor fibroblast cell type and transferred cloned embryo number on the efficiency of pig cloning. Cell. Reprogram. 15:35-42.   DOI
5 Liu Y, Li J, Lovendahl P, Schmidt M, Larsen K, Callesen H. 2015. In vitro manipulation techniques of porcine embryos: a meta-analysis related to transfers, pregnancies and piglets. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 27:429-439.   DOI
6 Machaty Z, Day BN, Prather RS. 1998. Development of early porcine embryos in vitro and in vivo. Biol. Reprod. 59:451-455.   DOI
7 Martin L, Besch-Williford C, Lai L, Cheong HT, Im GS, Park KW, Murphy C, Hao Y, Ellersieck MR, Keisler DH, Schatten H, Green JA, Prather RS. 2007. Morphologic and histologic comparisons between in vivo and nuclear transfer derived porcine embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 74:952-960.   DOI
8 Nakamura Y, Tajima S, Kikuchi K. 2017. The quality after culture in vitro or in vivo of porcine oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro and their ability to develop to term. Anim. Sci. J. 88:1916-1924.   DOI
9 Park MR, Cho SK, Park JY, Lee SY, Choi YJ, Kwon DN, Son WJ, Seo HG, Kim JH. 2004. Detection of rare Leydig cell hypoplasia in somatic cell cloned male piglets. Zygote 12:305-313.   DOI
10 Petersen B, Lucas-Hahn A, Oropeza M, Hornen N, Lemme E, Hassel P, Queisser AL, Niemann H. 2008. Development and validation of a highly efficient protocol of porcine somatic cloning using preovulatory embryo transfer in peripubertal gilts. Cloning Stem Cells 10:355-362.   DOI
11 Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KH. 2000. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 407:86-90.   DOI
12 Bang JI, Yoo JG, Park MR, Shin TS, Cho BW, Lee HG, Kim BW, Kang TY, Kong IK, Kim JH, Cho SK. 2013. The effects of artificial activation timing on the development of SCNT-derived embryos and newborn piglets. Reprod. Biol. 13:127-132.   DOI
13 Betthauser J, Forsberg E, Augenstein M, Childs L, Eilertsen K, Enos J, Forsythe T, Golueke P, Jurgella G, Koppang R, Lesmeister T, Mallon K, Mell G, Misica P, Pace M, Pfister-Genskow M, Strelchenko N, Voelker G, Watt S, Thompson S, Bishop M. 2000. Production of cloned pigs from in vitro systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 18:1055-1059.   DOI
14 Callesen H, Liu Y, Pedersen HS, Li R, Schmidt M. 2014. Increasing efficiency in production of cloned piglets. Cell. Reprogram. 16:407-410.   DOI
15 Dang-Nguyen TQ, Wells D, Haraguchi S, Men NT, Nguyen HT, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, Kikuchi K. 2020. Combined refinements to somatic cell nuclear transfer methods improve porcine embryo development. J. Reprod. Dev. 66:281-286.   DOI
16 Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H, Perry AC. 2000. Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science 289:1188-1190.   DOI
17 Jeong PS, Sim BW, Park SH, Kim MJ, Kang HG, Nanjidsuren T, Lee S, Song BS, Koo DB, Kim SU. 2020. Chaetocin improves pig cloning efficiency by enhancing epigenetic reprogramming and autophagic activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:4836.   DOI
18 Hornen N, Kues WA, Carnwath JW, Lucas-Hahn A, Petersen B, Hassel P, Niemann H. 2007. Production of viable pigs from fetal somatic stem cells. Cloning Stem Cells 9:364-373.   DOI
19 Huan Y, Hu K, Xie B, Shi Y, Wang F, Zhou Y, Liu S, Huang B, Zhu J, Liu Z, He Y, Li J, Kong Q, Liu Z. 2015. Ovulation statuses of surrogate gilts are associated with the efficiency of excellent pig cloning. PLoS One 10:e0142549.   DOI
20 Huang Y, Ouyang H, Yu H, Lai L, Pang D, Li Z. 2013. Efficiency of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer - a retrospective study of factors related to embryo recipient and embryos transferred. Biol. Open 2:1223-1228.   DOI
21 Rim CH, Fu Z, Bao L, Chen H, Zhang D, Luo Q, Ri HC, Huang H, Luan Z, Zhang Y, Cui C, Xiao L, Jong UM. 2013. The effect of the number of transferred embryos, the interval between nuclear transfer and embryo transfer, and the transfer pattern on pig cloning efficiency. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 143:91-96.   DOI
22 Salilew-Wondim D, Tesfaye D, Hossain M, Held E, Rings F, Tholen E, Looft C, Cinar U, Schellander K, Hoelker M. 2013. Aberrant placenta gene expression pattern in bovine pregnancies established after transfer of cloned or in vitro produced embryos. Physiol. Genomics 45:28-46.   DOI
23 Schmidt M, Kragh PM, Li J, Du Y, Lin L, Liu Y, Bogh IB, Winther KD, Vajta G, Callesen H. 2010. Pregnancies and piglets from large white sow recipients after two transfer methods of cloned and transgenic embryos of different pig breeds. Theriogenology 74:1233-1240.   DOI
24 Yoo JG, Kim BW, Park MR, Kwon DN, Choi YJ, Shin TS, Cho BW, Seo J, Kim JH, Cho SK. 2017. Influences of somatic donor cell sex on in vitro and in vivo embryo development following somatic cell nuclear transfer in pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 30:585-592.   DOI
25 Shi J, Zhou R, Luo L, Mai R, Zeng H, He X, Liu D, Zeng F, Cai G, Ji H, Tang F, Wang Q, Wu Z, Li Z. 2015. Influence of embryo handling and transfer method on pig cloning efficiency. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 154:121-127.   DOI
26 Wei H, Qing Y, Pan W, Zhao H, Li H, Cheng W, Zhao L, Xu C, Li H, Li S, Ye L, Wei T, Li X, Fu G, Li W, Xin J, Zeng Y. 2013. Comparison of the efficiency of Banna miniature inbred pig somatic cell nuclear transfer among different donor cells. PLoS One 8:e57728.   DOI
27 Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KH. 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385:810-813.   DOI